Standard Practice for Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices that Use Laboratory Light Sources

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Significance:  
4.1.1 When conducting exposures in devices that use laboratory light sources, it is important to consider how well the accelerated test conditions will reproduce property changes and failure modes associated with end-use environments for the materials being tested. In addition, it is essential to consider the effects of variability in both the accelerated test and outdoor exposures when setting up exposure experiments and when interpreting the results from accelerated exposure tests.  
4.1.2 No laboratory exposure test can be specified as a total simulation of actual use conditions in outdoor environments. Results obtained from these laboratory accelerated exposures can be considered as representative of actual use exposures only when the degree of rank correlation has been established for the specific materials being tested and when the type of degradation is the same. The relative durability of materials in actual use conditions can be very different in different locations because of differences in UV radiation, time of wetness, relative humidity, temperature, pollutants, and other factors. Therefore, even if results from a specific exposure test conducted according to this practice are found to be useful for comparing the relative durability of materials exposed in a particular exterior environment, it cannot be assumed that they will be useful for determining relative durability of the same materials for a different environment.  
4.1.3 Even though it is very tempting, calculation of an acceleration factor relating  x h or megajoules of radiant exposure in a laboratory accelerated test to y months or years of exterior exposure is not recommended. These acceleration factors are not valid for several reasons.  
4.1.3.1 Acceleration factors are material dependent and can be significantly different for each material and for different formulations of the same material.
4.1.3.2 Variability in the rate of degradation in both actual use and la...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers general procedures to be used when exposing nonmetallic materials in accelerated test devices that use laboratory light sources. Detailed information regarding procedures to be used for specific devices are found in standards describing the particular device being used. For example, detailed information covering exposures in devices that use open flame carbon arc, enclosed carbon arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV light source are found in Practices G152, G153, G154, and G155 respectively.
Note 1: Carbon-arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV exposures were also described in Practices G23, G26, and G53 which referred to very specific equipment designs. Practices G152, G153, and G154, and G155 are performance based standards that replace Practices G23, G26, and G53.  
1.2 This practice also describes general performance requirements for devices used for exposing nonmetallic materials to laboratory light sources. This information is intended primarily for producers of laboratory accelerated exposure devices.  
1.3 This practice provides information on the use and interpretation of data from accelerated exposure tests. Specific information about methods for determining the property of a nonmetallic material before and after exposure are found in standards describing the method used to measure each property. Information regarding the reporting of results from exposure testing of plastic materials is described in Practice D5870.
Note 2: Guide G141 provides information for addressing variability in exposure testing of nonmetallic materials. Guide G169 provides information for application of statistics to exposure test results.
Note 3: This standard is technically equivalent to ISO 4892, Part 1.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, an...

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Dec-2018

Relations

Effective Date
01-Nov-2023
Effective Date
01-Jun-2020
Effective Date
01-Nov-2019
Effective Date
01-Jun-2017
Effective Date
01-Feb-2017
Effective Date
01-Nov-2016
Effective Date
01-Apr-2016
Effective Date
01-Mar-2014
Effective Date
01-Sep-2013
Effective Date
01-May-2013
Effective Date
01-Dec-2012
Effective Date
01-Jun-2012
Effective Date
01-Nov-2011
Effective Date
01-Nov-2011
Effective Date
01-Sep-2011

Overview

ASTM G151-19: Standard Practice for Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices That Use Laboratory Light Sources establishes general procedures for exposing nonmetallic materials-including plastics, rubbers, coatings, and composites-in accelerated test environments that utilize laboratory light sources. The primary aim of ASTM G151-19 is to standardize accelerated weathering practices, promoting reliable data and meaningful comparisons of material durability under simulated environmental conditions.

Accelerated weathering tests help manufacturers, research labs, and quality assurance professionals predict long-term performance and service life of nonmetallic materials by simulating the effects of sunlight, humidity, and other elements within a controlled timeframe. This standard is widely referenced in industries such as automotive, construction, consumer goods, and aerospace, where material longevity and resistance to photodegradation are critical.

Key Topics

  • Test Conditions and Limitations

    • ASTM G151-19 explains that laboratory accelerated exposure cannot fully replicate actual outdoor service conditions.
    • Test conditions-such as UV radiation, temperature, humidity, and pollutants-vary significantly between laboratory and real-world environments.
    • Results from laboratory testing are suitable for comparative purposes, and their direct equivalency to outdoor exposure should be supported by correlation studies.
  • Device Requirements

    • Specifies uniform irradiance requirements for exposure devices and periodic repositioning of specimens if uniformity falls below thresholds.
    • Recommends instrument calibration, including for radiometers and temperature sensors, to ensure accuracy and traceability to national standards.
  • Environmental Factors

    • Addresses the control and impact of light (UV, visible), temperature (using black panel sensors), humidity, and wetting on material exposure.
    • Discusses the importance of water purity in wetting cycles to avoid contamination that could skew results.
  • Specimen Handling

    • Covers guidelines for test specimen preparation, handling, and storage to preserve material integrity and obtain valid test outcomes.
    • Recommends the use of control and reference materials to validate test consistency.
  • Reporting and Interpretation

    • Encourages detailed reporting of test conditions, equipment used, and calibration procedures.
    • Emphasizes the importance of documenting variability and statistical analysis of test results.

Applications

ASTM G151-19 is critical for:

  • Material Development: Supporting R&D teams in evaluating new nonmetallic formulations for resistance to UV degradation, color fading, and loss of physical properties.
  • Quality Assurance: Assisting manufacturers in confirming production consistency and compliance with customer specifications.
  • Product Certification: Providing evidence of material performance for certifications in automotive, building products, and outdoor applications.
  • Comparative Analysis: Allowing laboratories and suppliers to compare materials against industry benchmarks or competitor products under consistent accelerated weathering conditions.

Common applications include testing plastics, paints, coatings, elastomers, sealants, roofing materials, and other polymers used outdoors or in sunlight-exposed environments.

Related Standards

Numerous ASTM and ISO standards complement ASTM G151-19 or provide device-specific guidelines. Some important related documents include:

  • ASTM G152: Open Flame Carbon Arc Apparatus
  • ASTM G153: Enclosed Carbon Arc Apparatus
  • ASTM G154: Fluorescent UV Lamp Apparatus
  • ASTM G155: Xenon Arc Apparatus
  • ASTM G141: Guide for Addressing Variability in Exposure Testing
  • ASTM G169: Guide for Application of Basic Statistical Methods to Weathering Tests
  • ISO 4892-1: Plastics-Exposure to Laboratory Light Sources-General Guidance (technically equivalent to ASTM G151-19)

Utilizing ASTM G151-19 in conjunction with these device- and property-specific standards ensures comprehensive, accurate, and industry-recognized accelerated testing of nonmetallic materials.

Keywords: ASTM G151-19, accelerated weathering, nonmetallic materials, laboratory light sources, UV exposure testing, material durability, weathering test standards, device calibration, plastics, coatings, comparative testing

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM G151-19 - Standard Practice for Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices that Use Laboratory Light Sources

English language (15 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off
Standard

REDLINE ASTM G151-19 - Standard Practice for Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices that Use Laboratory Light Sources

English language (15 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

IMP NDT d.o.o.

Non-destructive testing services. Radiography, ultrasonic, magnetic particle, penetrant, visual inspection.

SA Slovenia Verified

Inštitut za kovinske materiale in tehnologije

Institute of Metals and Technology. Materials testing, metallurgical analysis, NDT.

SA Slovenia Verified

Q Techna d.o.o.

NDT and quality assurance specialist. 30+ years experience. NDT personnel certification per ISO 9712, nuclear and thermal power plant inspections, QA/

SA Slovenia Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM G151-19 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices that Use Laboratory Light Sources". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Significance: 4.1.1 When conducting exposures in devices that use laboratory light sources, it is important to consider how well the accelerated test conditions will reproduce property changes and failure modes associated with end-use environments for the materials being tested. In addition, it is essential to consider the effects of variability in both the accelerated test and outdoor exposures when setting up exposure experiments and when interpreting the results from accelerated exposure tests. 4.1.2 No laboratory exposure test can be specified as a total simulation of actual use conditions in outdoor environments. Results obtained from these laboratory accelerated exposures can be considered as representative of actual use exposures only when the degree of rank correlation has been established for the specific materials being tested and when the type of degradation is the same. The relative durability of materials in actual use conditions can be very different in different locations because of differences in UV radiation, time of wetness, relative humidity, temperature, pollutants, and other factors. Therefore, even if results from a specific exposure test conducted according to this practice are found to be useful for comparing the relative durability of materials exposed in a particular exterior environment, it cannot be assumed that they will be useful for determining relative durability of the same materials for a different environment. 4.1.3 Even though it is very tempting, calculation of an acceleration factor relating x h or megajoules of radiant exposure in a laboratory accelerated test to y months or years of exterior exposure is not recommended. These acceleration factors are not valid for several reasons. 4.1.3.1 Acceleration factors are material dependent and can be significantly different for each material and for different formulations of the same material. 4.1.3.2 Variability in the rate of degradation in both actual use and la... SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers general procedures to be used when exposing nonmetallic materials in accelerated test devices that use laboratory light sources. Detailed information regarding procedures to be used for specific devices are found in standards describing the particular device being used. For example, detailed information covering exposures in devices that use open flame carbon arc, enclosed carbon arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV light source are found in Practices G152, G153, G154, and G155 respectively. Note 1: Carbon-arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV exposures were also described in Practices G23, G26, and G53 which referred to very specific equipment designs. Practices G152, G153, and G154, and G155 are performance based standards that replace Practices G23, G26, and G53. 1.2 This practice also describes general performance requirements for devices used for exposing nonmetallic materials to laboratory light sources. This information is intended primarily for producers of laboratory accelerated exposure devices. 1.3 This practice provides information on the use and interpretation of data from accelerated exposure tests. Specific information about methods for determining the property of a nonmetallic material before and after exposure are found in standards describing the method used to measure each property. Information regarding the reporting of results from exposure testing of plastic materials is described in Practice D5870. Note 2: Guide G141 provides information for addressing variability in exposure testing of nonmetallic materials. Guide G169 provides information for application of statistics to exposure test results. Note 3: This standard is technically equivalent to ISO 4892, Part 1. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, an...

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 Significance: 4.1.1 When conducting exposures in devices that use laboratory light sources, it is important to consider how well the accelerated test conditions will reproduce property changes and failure modes associated with end-use environments for the materials being tested. In addition, it is essential to consider the effects of variability in both the accelerated test and outdoor exposures when setting up exposure experiments and when interpreting the results from accelerated exposure tests. 4.1.2 No laboratory exposure test can be specified as a total simulation of actual use conditions in outdoor environments. Results obtained from these laboratory accelerated exposures can be considered as representative of actual use exposures only when the degree of rank correlation has been established for the specific materials being tested and when the type of degradation is the same. The relative durability of materials in actual use conditions can be very different in different locations because of differences in UV radiation, time of wetness, relative humidity, temperature, pollutants, and other factors. Therefore, even if results from a specific exposure test conducted according to this practice are found to be useful for comparing the relative durability of materials exposed in a particular exterior environment, it cannot be assumed that they will be useful for determining relative durability of the same materials for a different environment. 4.1.3 Even though it is very tempting, calculation of an acceleration factor relating x h or megajoules of radiant exposure in a laboratory accelerated test to y months or years of exterior exposure is not recommended. These acceleration factors are not valid for several reasons. 4.1.3.1 Acceleration factors are material dependent and can be significantly different for each material and for different formulations of the same material. 4.1.3.2 Variability in the rate of degradation in both actual use and la... SCOPE 1.1 This practice covers general procedures to be used when exposing nonmetallic materials in accelerated test devices that use laboratory light sources. Detailed information regarding procedures to be used for specific devices are found in standards describing the particular device being used. For example, detailed information covering exposures in devices that use open flame carbon arc, enclosed carbon arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV light source are found in Practices G152, G153, G154, and G155 respectively. Note 1: Carbon-arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV exposures were also described in Practices G23, G26, and G53 which referred to very specific equipment designs. Practices G152, G153, and G154, and G155 are performance based standards that replace Practices G23, G26, and G53. 1.2 This practice also describes general performance requirements for devices used for exposing nonmetallic materials to laboratory light sources. This information is intended primarily for producers of laboratory accelerated exposure devices. 1.3 This practice provides information on the use and interpretation of data from accelerated exposure tests. Specific information about methods for determining the property of a nonmetallic material before and after exposure are found in standards describing the method used to measure each property. Information regarding the reporting of results from exposure testing of plastic materials is described in Practice D5870. Note 2: Guide G141 provides information for addressing variability in exposure testing of nonmetallic materials. Guide G169 provides information for application of statistics to exposure test results. Note 3: This standard is technically equivalent to ISO 4892, Part 1. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, an...

ASTM G151-19 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 19.040 - Environmental testing. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM G151-19 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E839-23, ASTM G130-12(2020), ASTM E644-11(2019), ASTM G147-17, ASTM G156-17, ASTM E839-11(2016), ASTM D3924-16, ASTM G113-14, ASTM E772-13, ASTM E691-13, ASTM G154-12, ASTM G130-12, ASTM E691-11, ASTM E839-11, ASTM E772-11. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM G151-19 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: G151 − 19
Standard Practice for
Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices
that Use Laboratory Light Sources
This standard is issued under the fixed designation G151; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.1 Thispracticecoversgeneralprocedurestobeusedwhen
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
exposing nonmetallic materials in accelerated test devices that
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
use laboratory light sources. Detailed information regarding
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
procedures to be used for specific devices are found in
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
standards describing the particular device being used. For
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
example, detailed information covering exposures in devices
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
that use open flame carbon arc, enclosed carbon arc, xenon arc,
and fluorescent UV light source are found in Practices G152,
2. Referenced Documents
G153, G154, and G155 respectively.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
NOTE 1—Carbon-arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV exposures were
also described in Practices G23, G26, and G53 which referred to very D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing
specific equipment designs. Practices G152, G153, and G154, and G155
D3924 Specification for Standard Environment for Condi-
are performance based standards that replace Practices G23, G26, and
tioning and Testing Paint, Varnish, Lacquer, and Related
G53.
Materials (Withdrawn 2016)
1.2 This practice also describes general performance re-
D5870 Practice for Calculating Property Retention Index of
quirementsfordevicesusedforexposingnonmetallicmaterials
Plastics
to laboratory light sources. This information is intended
E41 Terminology Relating to Conditioning (Withdrawn
primarily for producers of laboratory accelerated exposure
2019)
devices.
E171 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Flexible Barrier
1.3 This practice provides information on the use and Packaging
E644 Test Methods for Testing Industrial Resistance Ther-
interpretation of data from accelerated exposure tests. Specific
information about methods for determining the property of a mometers
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
nonmetallic material before and after exposure are found in
standards describing the method used to measure each prop- Determine the Precision of a Test Method
E772 Terminology of Solar Energy Conversion
erty. Information regarding the reporting of results from
exposure testing of plastic materials is described in Practice E839 Test Methods for Sheathed Thermocouples and
Sheathed Thermocouple Cable
D5870.
G23 Practice for Operating Light-Exposure Apparatus
NOTE2—GuideG141providesinformationforaddressingvariabilityin
(Carbon-Arc Type) With and Without Water for Exposure
exposure testing of nonmetallic materials. Guide G169 provides informa-
(Withdrawn 2000)
of Nonmetallic Materials
tion for application of statistics to exposure test results.
NOTE 3—This standard is technically equivalent to ISO 4892, Part 1. G26 Practice for Operating Light-Exposure Apparatus
(Xenon-Arc Type) With and Without Water for Exposure
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
of Nonmetallic Materials (Discontinued 2001) (With-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
drawn 2000)
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
1 2
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee G03 on Weathering For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
and Durability and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee G03.03 on contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Simulated and Controlled Exposure Tests. Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2019. Published February 2019. Originally the ASTM website.
approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2010 as G151 – 10. DOI: The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
10.1520/G0151-19. www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
G151 − 19
G53 Practice for Operating Light-and Water-Exposure Ap- 4.1.1 When conducting exposures in devices that use labo-
paratus (Fluorescent UV-Condensation Type) for Expo- ratory light sources, it is important to consider how well the
sure of Nonmetallic Materials (Withdrawn 2000) acceleratedtestconditionswillreproducepropertychangesand
G113 Terminology Relating to Natural andArtificial Weath- failure modes associated with end-use environments for the
ering Tests of Nonmetallic Materials materialsbeingtested.Inaddition,itisessentialtoconsiderthe
G130 Test Method for Calibration of Narrow- and Broad- effects of variability in both the accelerated test and outdoor
Band Ultraviolet Radiometers Using a Spectroradiometer exposures when setting up exposure experiments and when
G141 Guide for Addressing Variability in Exposure Testing interpreting the results from accelerated exposure tests.
of Nonmetallic Materials 4.1.2 No laboratory exposure test can be specified as a total
G147 Practice for Conditioning and Handling of Nonmetal- simulation of actual use conditions in outdoor environments.
lic Materials for Natural and Artificial Weathering Tests Results obtained from these laboratory accelerated exposures
G152 Practice for Operating Open Flame Carbon Arc Light can be considered as representative of actual use exposures
Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials only when the degree of rank correlation has been established
G153 Practice for Operating Enclosed Carbon Arc Light for the specific materials being tested and when the type of
Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials degradation is the same. The relative durability of materials in
G154 Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV)
actualuseconditionscanbeverydifferentindifferentlocations
Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials because of differences in UV radiation, time of wetness,
G155 Practice for Operating XenonArc LightApparatus for
relative humidity, temperature, pollutants, and other factors.
Exposure of Non-Metallic Materials Therefore, even if results from a specific exposure test con-
G156 Practice for Selecting and Characterizing Weathering
ducted according to this practice are found to be useful for
Reference Materials comparing the relative durability of materials exposed in a
G169 Guide for Application of Basic Statistical Methods to
particular exterior environment, it cannot be assumed that they
Weathering Tests will be useful for determining relative durability of the same
G177 Tables for Reference Solar Ultraviolet Spectral Distri-
materials for a different environment.
butions: Hemispherical on 37° Tilted Surface 4.1.3 Even though it is very tempting, calculation of an
2.2 ISO Standards: acceleration factor relating x h or megajoules of radiant
ISO 4892, Part 1 Plastics: Exposure to laboratory Light exposure in a laboratory accelerated test to y months or years
Sources—General Guidance of exterior exposure is not recommended. These acceleration
ISO 9370 Plastics: Instrumental Determination of Radiant factors are not valid for several reasons.
Exposure in Weathering Tests—General Guidance and 4.1.3.1 Acceleration factors are material dependent and can
Basic Test Method be significantly different for each material and for different
2.3 CIE Document: formulations of the same material.
CIE Publication Number 85: 1989 Technical Report—Solar 4.1.3.2 Variability in the rate of degradation in both actual
Spectral Irradiance use and laboratory accelerated exposure test can have a
significant effect on the calculated acceleration factor.
2.4 Other Documents:
4.1.3.3 Acceleration factors calculated based on the ratio of
IES LM-58-13 Spectroradiometric Measurement Methods
irradiance between a laboratory light source and solar
for Light Sources (2013 or Later)
radiation,evenwhenidenticalbandpassesareused,donottake
NIST SP250-89 Spectral Irradiance Calibrations
into consideration the effects on a material of irradiance,
2.5 ASTM Adjuncts:
temperature, moisture, and differences in spectral power dis-
SMARTS2,SimpleModelforAtmosphericTransmissionof
tribution between the laboratory light source and solar radia-
Sunshine
tion.
3. Terminology
NOTE 4—If use of an acceleration factor is desired in spite of the
3.1 Definitions—The definitions given in Terminologies
warnings given in this practice, such acceleration factors for a particular
material are only valid if they are based on data from a sufficient number
E41, E772, and G113 are applicable to this practice.
of separate exterior and laboratory accelerated exposures so that results
used to relate times to failure in each exposure can be analyzed using
4. Significance and Use
statistical methods. An example of a statistical analysis using multiple
4.1 Significance:
laboratory and exterior exposures to calculate an acceleration factor is
described by J. A. Simms (
1).
4.1.4 There are a number of factors that may decrease the
Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
degree of correlation between accelerated tests using labora-
4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Available from the Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage, CIE, Central
tory light sources and exterior exposures. More specific infor-
Bureau, Kegelgasse 27,A-1030Vienna,Austria or the U.S. National Committee for
mation on how each factor may alter stability ranking of
CIE, National Institute for Science and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
6 materials is given in Appendix X1.
Available from Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA),
120 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, https://www.ies.org/.
Available from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100
Bureau Dr., Stop 1070, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1070, http://www.nist.gov.
8 9
Available from ASTM International Headquarters. Order Adjunct No. The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of
ADJG173CD. Original adjunct produced in 2005. this standard.
G151 − 19
4.1.4.1 Differences in the spectral distribution between the 5.1.1 The exposure device shall provide for placement of
laboratory light source and solar radiation. specimens and any designated sensing devices in positions
4.1.4.2 Light intensities higher than those experienced in which provide uniform irradiance by the light source.
actual use conditions.
NOTE 8—In some devices, several individual light sources are used
4.1.4.3 Test conditions where specimens are exposed con-
simultaneously. In these devices, the term light source refers to the
tinuously to light when actual use conditions provide alternate
combination of individual light sources being used.
periods of light and dark.
5.1.2 Manufacturers of exposure devices shall assure that
4.1.4.4 Specimen temperatures higher than those in actual
the irradiance at any location in the area used for specimen
conditions.
exposures is at least 70 % of the maximum irradiance mea-
4.1.4.5 Exposure conditions that produce unrealistic tem-
sured in this area. Procedures for measuring irradiance unifor-
perature differences between light and dark colored specimens.
mity are found in Annex A1.
4.1.4.6 Exposure conditions that do not have any tempera-
NOTE 9—During use, the irradiance uniformity in exposure devices can
ture cycling or that produce temperature cycling, or thermal
be affected by several factors, such as deposits, which can develop on the
shock, or both, that is not representative of use conditions.
optical system and chamber walls. Irradiance uniformity also can be
4.1.4.7 Unrealistically high or low levels of moisture.
affected by the type and number of specimens being exposed. The
4.1.4.8 Absence of biological agents or pollutants.
irradiance uniformity as assured by the manufacturer is valid for new
equipment and well defined measuring conditions.
4.2 Use ofAccelerated Tests with Laboratory Light Sources:
4.2.1 Results from accelerated exposure tests conducted 5.1.3 Periodic repositioning of the specimens during expo-
according to this standard are best used to compare the relative
sure is not necessary if the irradiance at positions farthest from
performance of materials.Acommon application is conducting the point of maximum irradiance is at least 90 % of the
a test to establish that the level of quality of different batches
maximum measured irradiance.
doesnotvaryfromacontrolmaterialwithknownperformance.
5.1.4 If irradiance at any position in the area used for
Comparisons between materials are best made when they are
specimen exposure is between 70 and 90 % of the maximum
tested at the same time in the same exposure device. Results
irradiance, specimens shall be periodically repositioned to
can be expressed by comparing the exposure time or radiant
reducevariabilityinradiantexposure.Therepositioningsched-
exposure necessary to change a characteristic property to some
ule shall be agreed upon by all interested parties. Appendix X2
specified level.
describes some possible specimen placement and repositioning
4.2.1.1 Reproducibility of test results between laboratories
plans and frequencies.
has been shown to be good when the stability of materials is
NOTE 10—While not required in devices meeting the irradiance
evaluated in terms of performance ranking compared to other
uniformity requirements of 5.1.3, periodic specimen repositioning is a
materials or to a control (2, 3); therefore, exposure of a similar
good practice to reduce the variability in exposure stresses experienced
material of known performance (a control) at the same time as during the test interval.
the test materials is strongly recommended.
5.1.5 Replace lamps and filters according to the schedule
4.2.2 In some applications, weathering reference materials
recommended by the device manufacturer. Follow the appara-
are used to establish consistency of the operating conditions in
tus manufacturer’s instructions for lamp and filter replacement
an exposure test.
and for pre-aging of lamps or filters, or both.
4.2.3 Reference materials, for example, blue wool test
5.1.6 ASTM G177 describes a standard solar ultraviolet
fabric, also may be used for the purpose of timing exposures.
spectrum that can be used as a basis for comparing laboratory
In some cases, a reference material is exposed at the same time
accelerated light sources with sunlight. The atmospheric con-
as a test material and the exposure is conducted until there is a
ditions used in this standard solar spectrum were selected to
defined change in property of the reference material. The test
maximize the fraction of short wavelength solar ultraviolet
materialthenisevaluated.Insomecases,theresultsforthetest
radiation.
material are compared to those for the reference material.
NOTE 11—Previous versions of this standard used a solar spectrum
These are inappropriate uses of reference materials when they
defined in CIE Publication 85-1989, Table 4 as the benchmark for
are not sensitive to exposure stresses that produce failure in the
comparing light sources used in laboratory accelerated exposure tests to
test material or when the reference material is very sensitive to
solar radiation. Appendix X3 provides a comparison of the atmospheric
an exposure stress that has very little effect on the test material.
conditions and solar spectra of ASTM G177 and Table 4 of CIE 85.
NOTE 5—Definitions for control and reference material that are appro-
5.1.6.1 Direct radiation from xenon burners, open flame
priate to weathering tests are found in Terminology G113.
carbon arcs, and some fluorescent lamps contains considerable
NOTE 6—Practice G156 describes procedures for selecting and charac-
amountsofshortwavelengthultravioletradiationnotpresentin
terizing weathering reference materials used to establish consistency of
solar radiation. With proper selection of filters for these light
operating conditions in a laboratory accelerated test.
NOTE7—Resultsfromacceleratedexposuretestsshouldonlybeusedto sources, much of the short wavelength light can be eliminated.
establish a pass/fail approval of materials after a specific time of exposure
However, with many filters a small, but significant, amount of
to a prescribed set of conditions when the variability in the exposure and
this short wavelength (less than 300 nm) radiation is present in
property measurement procedure has been quantified so that statistically
the spectral distribution of the filtered light source. Fluorescent
significant pass/fail judgments can be made.
UVlampscanbeselectedtohaveaspectraloutputcorrespond-
5. Requirements for Laboratory Exposure Devices
ing to a particular ultraviolet region of solar radiation. The
5.1 Light Source: xenon arc, when appropriately filtered, produces radiation with
G151 − 19
a spectral power distribution that is a good simulation of surface temperature of individual test specimens, a specified
average solar radiation throughout the UV and visible region. black-panel sensor is used to measure and control temperature
5.1.7 The apparatus should have a means to monitor and within the test chamber. It is strongly recommended that the
control the specimen irradiance. black panel temperature sensor be mounted within the speci-
men exposure area so that it receives the same radiation and
NOTE 12—In apparatus that do not provide irradiance control, the
cooling conditions as a flat test panel surface. The black panel
specimen irradiance may vary over time as the source and some optical
filters used to modify its spectral distribution age. This variance may also may be located at a fixed distance position different from
contribute to differences between weathering tests conducted in different
the test specimens and calibrated for temperature in the
apparatus as well as those conducted in the same apparatus at separate
specimen exposure area. This is not recommended, however,
times.
because black panels mounted at a fixed position away from
5.1.7.1 In apparatus equipped with irradiance control, an
the specimens may not indicate temperatures representative of
irradiance set point control system comprised of an integrated
the test specimens, even if they are calibrated to record
on-boardirradiancesensorcoupledwithanelectronicfeedback
temperature at positions within the specimen exposure area,
loop shall operate to maintain the irradiance at the set point.
due to differences in light intensity and movement of air.
This control system shall be calibrated to report the irradiance
5.2.1.1 The type of mounting used for uninsulated black or
atthespecimenplanewhethertheon-boardirradiancesensoris
white panels (that is, whether the back of the panel is directly
located within the specimen plane or outside the specimen
exposed to air or if the panel is placed against a solid metal
plane.
backing) will have an effect on the conditions in the chamber.
5.1.7.2 The irradiance set point control system shall be
Describe the mounting used for the uninsulated black or white
calibratedatregularintervalsrelativetoanirradiancereference
panel in the test report.
device (that is, a radiometer or other suitable transfer calibra-
tionstandard)toassureacceptableaccuracyandreliability.The
NOTE 14—Previous versions of this standard specified an uninsulated
black panel with an open back subjected to the air within the exposure
irradiance set point control system shall be calibrated when
chamber. Tests using a different backing configuration may produce
replacing any component of the optical system (for example, at
different results. Therefore, if a user wishes to compare to historical
each lamp replacement or filter change) and each time the
exposure results, it is recommended that the user duplicate the previous
weathering method is changed. A full calibration of the
backing configuration of the uninsulated black panel.
irradiance set point control system shall be conducted at least
5.2.2 Exposure devices shall use either an uninsulated black
once per year. More frequent calibrations and intermediate
panel (commonly referred to as a black panel thermometer) or
checks are recommended.
an insulated black panel (commonly referred to as a black
5.1.7.3 Theirradiancereferencedeviceshallbecalibratedin
standard thermometer) as black panel sensor. Requirements for
accordance with ISO 9370 resulting in traceability to a
each type are found in Annex A2.
National Metrology Institute (NMI). This device shall be
5.2.3 The temperature indicated by the uninsulated black-
calibrated at regular intervals to assure acceptable measure-
panel or insulated thermometer depends on the irradiance of
ment uncertainty, traceability, and reliability. Refer to the
thelaboratorylightsourceandthetemperatureandspeedofair
manufacturer’s recommendation for guidance on calibration
moving in the test chamber. Uninsulated black-panel tempera-
interval.
tures generally correspond to those for dark coatings on metal
NOTE 13—For guidance on good laboratory practices for measurement
panels. Insulated black panel thermometer temperatures gen-
and calibration of irradiance see IES LM-58-13 and NIST SP250-89.
erally correspond to those for the exposed surface of dark
5.1.7.4 Spectrally selective radiometers within the chain of
samples with poor thermal conductivity. At conditions used in
traceability shall comply with one of the types specified in
typical exposure tests, the temperature indicated by an insu-
ISO 9370.Afull calibration of the spectrally selective radiom-
lated black panel thermometer will be 3–12 °C higher than an
eter shall be conducted in accordance with Test Method G130
uninsulated black panel thermometer. The response time for
at least once per year. More frequent calibrations are recom-
temperaturechangesisslightlyslowerforinsulatedblackpanel
mended.
thermometers compared to uninsulated black panel thermom-
5.1.7.5 The irradiance set point control system and the
eters.
irradiance reference device shall be calibrated in terms of
5.2.3.1 At low irradiance, the difference between the tem-
irradiance, E , for a defined wavelength or defined wavelength
e
perature indicated by an uninsulated black panel or insulated
interval. Common examples of irradiance control points and
black panel and the real specimen may be small. When light
spectral ranges used in commercial weathering apparatus
sources that emit very little infrared radiation are used, there
include 340 nm, 420 nm, 300-400 nm, and 300-800 nm. Other
generally will be very small difference in temperatures indi-
control points and spectral ranges may be used as agreed upon
cated by the two types of black panels or between light and
by all interested parties.
dark colored specimens.
5.2 Temperature:
NOTE 15—There can be differences in temperature indicated by a single
5.2.1 The surface temperature of exposed materials depends
type of black panel thermometer, depending on the specific design of the
on the ambient temperature, the amount of radiation absorbed,
device supplied by different manufacturers. Work is being conducted
the emissivity of the specimen, the thermal conduction within
withinSubcommittee6ISOTC/61tocharacterizethedifferencesbetween
the specimen, and the heat transmission between specimen and
the different types of temperature sensing devices and between tempera-
air or specimen holder. Since it is not practical to monitor the ture sensing devices of the same type.
G151 − 19
5.2.4 In order to evaluate the range of surface temperatures anions, organics, and particularly silica, exposed specimens
of the exposed specimens, the use of an uninsulated or will develop spots or stains that do not occur in exterior
insulated white panel thermometer is recommended, in addi- exposures.Unlessotherwisespecified,waterusedforspecimen
tion to the uninsulated black panel or insulated black panel wettingshallhaveamaximumof1ppmsolidsandamaximum
thermometer. In some cases, temperature of either the uninsu- of 0.2 ppm silica. If the water used for specimen wetting is
lated or insulated white panel thermometer may be used to above 1 ppm solids, the solids and silica levels must be
specify exposure conditions. The uninsulated or insulated reported. Recirculation of water used for specimen wetting is
white panel shall be constructed in the same way as the not recommended and if done the recirculated water shall meet
corresponding uninsulated or insulated black panel the specified purity requirements.
thermometer, except for use of a white coating with a good
NOTE 16—Distillation, or a combination of deionization and reverse
resistance to aging. The reflectance of the white coating
osmosis can effectively produce water with the desired purity.
between 450 and 800 nm shall be at least 60 % and at least
5.3.3 If specimens are found to have deposits or stains after
30 % between 800 and 1500 nm.
exposure, the water purity must be checked to determine if it
5.2.5 When requested, suppliers of insulated or uninsulated
meets the purity requirements described in 5.3.2. On some
black or white panels shall provide certification that the black
occasions,exposedspecimenscanbecontaminatedbydeposits
or white coating meets the reflectance requirements given in
from bacteria than can grow in the purified water used for
this practice.
specimen wetting. If bacterial contamination is detected, the
5.2.6 Exposure devices that control temperature of a black
entire system used for specimen wetting shall be flushed with
or white temperature sensor shall be able to maintain fluctua-
a chlorinating solution, such as sodium hypochlorite and
tions at the control point as specified in Annex A3.
thoroughly rinsed prior to resuming exposures.
5.2.7 Manufacturers of exposure devices shall assure that
5.3.4 Although it does not always correlate with silica
the temperature of a black or white panel temperature sensor
content, it is recommended that the conductivity of the water
placed anywhere within the specimen exposure area shall be
used for specimen wetting be monitored continuously and that
within 63 °C of the set point temperature for set points up to
exposures be stopped whenever the conductivity is above
70 °C and within 64 °C for set point temperatures above
5 µS⁄cm.
70 °C.
5.3.5 All components of the specimen wetting unit shall be
5.2.8 The test report shall indicate whether an insulated or
fabricated from stainless steel, plastic, or other material that
uninsulated black or white panel was used. If either type of
does not contaminate the water. If plastic materials are used,
black or white panel thermometer is not positioned in the
they shall not leach low molecular weight UV absorbing
specimen exposure area, the exact position used shall be
components into the water.
described in the test report.
5.3.6 In devices where humidity within the test chamber is
5.2.9 If chamber air temperature is measured, the tempera-
controlled, sensors used to determine humidity shall be placed
turesensingelementshallbeshieldedfromthelightsourceand
within the test chamber air flow and shielded from direct
water spray. Exposure devices, which control temperature of
radiation and water spray. When humidity is controlled, the
chamber air shall be able to maintain temperature of chamber
measured relative humidity shall be within 65 % of the set
air within 63 °C of the set point temperature.
point humidity.
5.2.10 Calibrate thermocouples according to instructions
5.3.6.1 Calibrate the sensors used to determine humidity
provided by the device manufacturer. If no instructions are
according to the device manufacturer’s instructions.
provided by the device manufacture, sheathed thermocouples
5.3.7 Any device intended to introduce wetting of
shall be calibrated according to Test Methods E839, and
specimens, for example, by spray or immersion, shall have
resistance thermometers used as the sensing element for black
means to program intervals with and without wetting.
or white panel thermometers shall be calibrated according to
Test Methods E644. Unless otherwise specified, devices used
NOTE 17—There is currently no generally accepted method for charac-
to measure temperature shall be calibrated at least annually. terizing the uniformity or consistency of specimen wetting.
Wherever possible, calibrations should be traceable to a
5.4 Other Apparatus Requirements—Although various ap-
nationally recognized standards agency.
paratus designs are used in practice, each apparatus shall
5.3 Humidity and Wetting: include the following:
5.4.1 Any device intended to provide light and dark cycles
5.3.1 The presence of moisture may have a significant effect
shall have means to program intervals with or without light.
on exposure tests. Any apparatus operated according to this
The time of each light and dark cycle shall be controlled to
standard, which attempts to simulate the effects of moisture,
within 610 % of the shortest cycle time used. It is preferable
shall have means for providing moisture to specimens using
one or more of the following methods: humidification of to use cycle timers that are accurate and reproducible as
possible. Optionally, means to provide a record of the length of
chamber air, formation of condensation, water spray, or im-
mersion. The type and rate of material degradation can be light and dark cycles may be provided.
affected significantly by the method used to provide moisture 5.4.2 To fulfill the requirements of particular test
stress. procedures, the apparatus also may need to provide means to
register or record the following operational parameters.
5.3.2 The purity of the water used for specimen wetting is
very important. Without proper treatment to remove cations, 5.4.2.1 Line voltage;
G151 − 19
5.4.2.2 Lamp voltage and where appropriate, lamp wattage; 6.2.3 When material properties are measured using destruc-
5.4.2.3 Lamp current; tive tests, a separate set of specimens is needed for each
5.4.2.4 Temperature of uninsulated or insulated black or exposure period. When destructive tests are used, the total
white panel thermometer; number of test specimens required will be determined by the
5.4.2.5 Test chamber air temperature; number of exposure periods used and whether unexposed file
5.4.2.6 Test chamber relative humidity; specimens are tested at the same time as exposed specimens.
5.4.2.7 Water spray cycles; 6.2.4 Control materials with known durability should be
5.4.2.8 Irradiance or radiant exposure, or both, over a included with each exposure test. It is recommended that
specified spectral region; and control materials known to have relatively poor and good
5.4.2.9 Duration of exposure (radiation time and total, if durability be used. Control materials are used for the purpose
different). of comparing the performance of the test materials to the
5.4.3 Follow the recommendations of the device manufac- controls.Beforelaboratorytolaboratorycomparisonsaremade
turer regarding calibration of devices used to record each it is necessary to establish agreed upon control materials. The
operational parameter. number of specimens of the control material should be the
same as that used for test materials.
6. Test Specimens
6.3 Storage and Conditioning:
6.3.1 Conditioning and handling of test, control, reference,
6.1 Form and Preparation:
and file specimens shall be according to Practice G147.
6.1.1 The dimensions of the test specimens normally are
6.3.2 If test specimens are cut or machined from larger
those specified in the appropriate test method for the property
pieces, they should be conditioned after machining according
orpropertiestobemeasuredafterexposure.Whenthebehavior
to Practice D618, Specification D3924, or Practice E171.In
of a specific type of article is to be determined, the article itself
some circumstances, it may be necessary to precondition the
should be exposed whenever possible.
sheets prior to cutting or machining to facilitate specimen
6.1.2 For some tests, specimens to be exposed may be cut
preparation. The properties of some materials are very sensi-
fromalargersheetorpartthatisformedbyextrusion,injection
tive to moisture content and the duration of conditioning may
molding, or other process. The exact shape and dimensions of
need to be longer than those specified in these standards,
the specimens to be exposed will be determined by the specific
particularly where specimens have been exposed to climatic
testprocedureusedformeasurementofthepropertyofinterest.
extremes.
The procedures used to machine or cut individual test speci-
mens from a larger sheet or part may affect the results of the
7. General Procedure
property measurement and the apparent durability. Therefore,
7.1 Mark each specimen that will be exposed with a unique
themethodusedforspecimenpreparationshallbeagreedupon
identifying number in accordance with Practice G147.
by the interested parties and should be related closely to the
7.1.1 Do not touch the surface of exposed specimens or
method normally used to process the material in typical
optical components with bare skin because oils that are
application.
deposited may act as UV absorbers or contain contaminants
6.1.3 Unless otherwise specified or required, do not cut
which accelerate degradation.
individual test specimens for property measurement from
larger specimens that have been exposed. The effects any 7.2 Specific conditions and procedures for the exposure test
cutting or machining operation may have on the properties of
depend on the type of device used and the material being
individual test specimens usually are much larger when the test tested. For open flame carbon-arc, enclosed carbon-arc, fluo-
specimens are cut from a large piece after exposure. This is
rescent UV, and xenon-arc exposures, these can be found in
especially true for materials that embrittle on exposure.
Practices G152, G153, G154, and G155 and in other standards,
6.1.3.1 When test specimens are cut from an exposed sheet
which reference these practices.
or larger part, they should be taken from an area that is at least 7.2.1 For each exposure test, specific set points for impor-
20 mm from the fixture holding the material or from the
tant parameters such as irradiance, temperature, and humidity
exposed specimen edges. In no circumstances shall any mate-
are used. Typically, these parameters are measured and con-
rialfromtheexposedfaceberemovedduringthetestspecimen
trolled at a single position within the chamber. During normal
preparation.
operation, there is an allowable departure of the measured
6.1.4 When comparing materials in an exposure test, use
value from the set point. AnnexA3 provides detailed informa-
test specimens that are similar in dimensions and exposed area.
tion about the maximum allowable departure of the measured
value from the set point.
6.2 Number of Test Specimens:
7.2.2 Asingle point measurement does not mean conditions
6.2.1 The number of test specimens for each test condition
throughout the cabinet are the same. It does not mean two tests
orexposureperiodshallbethatspecifiedintheappropriatetest
run in similar cabinets will produce the same results. Cabinets
method for the property or properties to be measured after
thatcontroltemperaturebytheblackpanelwillnotproducethe
exposure.
same test as cabinets that control by air temperature.
6.2.2 Unless otherwise specified or required, use at least
three replicate specimens where properties are measured using 7.3 Select material properties that exhibit a significant
nondestructive tests and six replicate specimens where prop- change during the exposure period in order to provide weath-
erties are measured using destructive tests. ering performance discrimination among a series of materials.
G151 − 19
7.4 Follow the procedures described in the appropriate time in an exposure conducted according to this practice and
standard for measuring the properties of test specimens before time in an outdoor environment because they can give errone-
and after exposure. ous information. The acceleration factor is material dependent
and is only valid if it is based on data from a sufficient number
7.5 If nondestructive tests are used to measure properties of
of separate exterior and laboratory accelerated exposures so
the materials being tested, measure the properties of specimens
that results used to relate times to failure in each exposure can
before beginning the exposure.After each exposure increment,
be analyzed using statistical methods.
measure the same property that is measured initially on the
specimens. Take care to make the property measurement in the
NOTE20—Anexampleofastatisticalanalysisusingmultiplelaboratory
same position used for the initial measurement. and exterior exposures to calculate an acceleration factor is described by
J. A. Simms (1).
NOTE 18—To monitor the response of the instrument used to measure
8.3 After each exposure increment, evaluate or rate changes
the desired property, one can measure a calibration standard each time the
instrument is used. in exposed test specimens according to applicable ASTM test
methods.
7.6 If destructive tests are used to measure properties of the
materials being tested, prepare a separate set of test specimens
8.4 When results from exposures conducted according to
for each exposure period. Compare the value of the property
this practice are used in specifications, one of the following
afterexposuretothepropertymeasuredonanunexposedsetof
three criteria must be met.
specimens measured prior to beginning the exposure.
8.4.1 If a standard or specification for general use requires a
Alternatively,thepropertycanbemeasuredonaseparatesetof
definite property level after a specific time or radiant exposure
unexposed file specimens at the same time as the property of
in an exposure test conducted according to this practice, base
exposed specimens is measured. The results for the unexposed
the specified property level on results from round-robin experi-
file specimens and from the exposed specimens can then be
ments run to determine the test reproducibility from the
compared.
exposureandpropertymeasurementprocedures.Conductthese
round-robins according to Practice E691, and include a statis-
NOTE 19—Procedures and formulas for calculating the change in
material property of test materials and reference materials after exposure
tically representative sample of all laboratories or organiza-
can be found in Practice D5870.
tions who would normally conduct the exposure and property
7.7 Some materials will change color during storage in the measurement.
dark, particularly after weathering. It is essential that color 8.4.2 If a standard or specification for use between two or
measurement or visual comparisons be carried out as soon as
three parties requires a definite property level after a specific
possible after exposure once the exposed surface has dried. time or radiant exposure in an exposure test conducted accord-
ing to this practice, base the specified property level on two
8. Periods of Exposure and Evaluation of Test Results independent experiments run in each laboratory to determine
the reproducibility for the exposure and property measurement
8.1 In most cases, periodic evaluation of test and control
process.The reproducibility of the exposure/property measure-
materials is necessary to determine the variation in magnitude
ment process is then used to determine the minimum level of
anddirectionofpropertychangeasafunctionofexposuretime
property after the exposure that is mutually agreeable to all
or radiant exposure.
parties.
8.2 The time or radiant exposure necessary to produce a
8.4.3 When reproducibility in results from an exposure test
defined change in a material property can be used to evaluate
conducted according to this practice has not been established
or rank the stability of materials.This method is preferred over
through round-robin testing, specify performance requirements
evaluating materials after an arbitrary exposure time or radiant
for materials in terms of comparison (ranked) to a control
exposure.
material.All specimens shall be exposed simultaneously in the
8.2.1 Exposure to an arbitrary time or radiant exposure may
same device. All concerned parties must agree on the specific
be used for the purpose of a specific test if agreed upon by the
control material used.
parties concerned or if required for conformance to a particular
8.4.3.1 Conduct analysis of variance to determine whether
specification. When a single exposure period is used, select a
anydifferencesbetweentestmaterialsandcontrolmaterialsare
time or radiant exposure that will produce the largest perfor-
statistically significant. Expose replicates of the test specimen
mance differences between the test materials or between the
and the control specimen so that statistically significant per-
test material and the control material.
formance differences can be determined.
8.2.2 The minimum exposure time used shall be that nec-
NOTE 21—Fischer and Ketola illustrate (4) use of rank comparison
essary to produce a substantial change in the property of
between test and control materials in specifications.
interest for the least stable material being evaluated. An
NOTE 22—Guide G169 includes examples showing use of analysis of
exposure time that produces a significant change in one type of
variance to compare materials.
material cannot be assumed to be applicable to other types of
materials.
9. Test Report
8.2.3 The relation between time to failure in an exposure
9.1 Report the following information:
conducted according to this practice and service life in an
9.1.1 Specimen description;
outdoor environment requires determination of a valid accel-
eration factor. Do not use arbitrary acceleration factors relating 9.1.1.1 Afull description of the specimens and their origin;
G151 − 19
9.1.1.2 Compound details, cure time, and temperature 9.1.2.11 Time of each light and dark period;
where appropriate; and 9.1.2.12 Setpointforwhitepaneltemperature,ifapplicable;
9.1.1.3 Complete description of the method used for prepa-
and
ration of test specimens. 9.1.2.13 Set point for chamber air temperature, if appli-
cable.
NOTE 23—If exposure tests are conducted by a contracting agency,
9.1.2.14 Description of method used to mount specimens in
specimens usually are identified by code number. In such cases, it is the
responsibility of the originating laboratory to provide the complete exposureframe,includingadescriptionofanymaterialusedas
specimen description when reporting results of the exposure test.
backing for test specimens.
9.1.2.15 Description for test specimen repositioning, if
9.1.2 Description of Exposure Test—Description of the
used.
exposure device and light source including:
9.1.2.1 Type of device and light source; 9.1.2.16 Description of the radiometers used for measuring
light dosage, if used.
9.1.2.2 Description of the filters used;
9.1.2.3 If required, set point for irradiance at the specimen 9.1.3 Test Results:
surface, including the bandpass in which the radiation was 9.1.3.1 Complete description of the test procedure used for
measured; and measurement of any properties reported including reference to
9.1.2.4 If required, wattage used for laboratory light source.
applicable ASTM or other standards.
9.1.2.5 Type of black or white panel thermometer, or both, 9.1.3.2 Results from property measurement on test speci-
if used. Describe how the black or white panel thermometer is
mens;
mounted in the specimen exposure area, including whether the
9.1.3.3 Results from property measurement on control
black or white panel thermometer was mounted on a solid
specimens;
surface or with
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: G151 − 10 G151 − 19
Standard Practice for
Exposing Nonmetallic Materials in Accelerated Test Devices
that Use Laboratory Light Sources
This standard is issued under the fixed designation G151; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice providescovers general procedures to be used when exposing nonmetallic materials in accelerated test devices
that use laboratory light sources. Detailed information regarding procedures to be used for specific devices are found in standards
describing the particular device being used. For example, detailed information covering exposures in devices that use open flame
carbon arc, enclosed carbon arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV light source are found in Practices G152, G153, G154, and G155
respectively.
NOTE 1—Carbon-arc, xenon arc, and fluorescent UV exposures were also described in Practices G23, G26, and G53 which referred to very specific
equipment designs. Practices G152, G153, and G154, and G155 are performance based standards that replace Practices G23, G26, and G53.
1.2 This practice also describes general performance requirements for devices used for exposing nonmetallic materials to
laboratory light sources. This information is intended primarily for producers of laboratory accelerated exposure devices.
1.3 This practice provides information on the use and interpretation of data from accelerated exposure tests. Specific
information about methods for determining the property of a nonmetallic material before and after exposure are found in standards
describing the method used to measure each property. Information regarding the reporting of results from exposure testing of
plastic materials is described in Practice D5870.
NOTE 2—Guide G141 provides information for addressing variability in exposure testing of nonmetallic materials. Guide G169 provides information
for application of statistics to exposure test resultsresults.
NOTE 3—This standard is technically equivalent to ISO 4892, Part 1.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D618 Practice for Conditioning Plastics for Testing
D3924 Specification for Standard Environment for Conditioning and Testing Paint, Varnish, Lacquer, and Related Materials
(Withdrawn 2016)
D5870 Practice for Calculating Property Retention Index of Plastics
E41 Terminology Relating to Conditioning (Withdrawn 2019)
E171 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Flexible Barrier Packaging
E644 Test Methods for Testing Industrial Resistance Thermometers
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
E772 Terminology of Solar Energy Conversion
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee G03 on Weathering and Durability and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee G03.03 on Simulated
and Controlled Exposure Tests.
Current edition approved April 1, 2010Jan. 1, 2019. Published May 2010February 2019. Originally approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 20092010 as
G151 – 09.G151 – 10. DOI: 10.1520/G0151-10.10.1520/G0151-19.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
G151 − 19
E839 Test Methods for Sheathed Thermocouples and Sheathed Thermocouple Cable
G23 Practice for Operating Light-Exposure Apparatus (Carbon-Arc Type) With and Without Water for Exposure of Nonmetallic
Materials (Withdrawn 2000)
G26 Practice for Operating Light-Exposure Apparatus (Xenon-Arc Type) With and Without Water for Exposure of Nonmetallic
Materials (Discontinued 2001) (Withdrawn 2000)
G53 Practice for Operating Light-and Water-Exposure Apparatus (Fluorescent UV-Condensation Type) for Exposure of
Nonmetallic Materials (Withdrawn 2000)
G113 Terminology Relating to Natural and Artificial Weathering Tests of Nonmetallic Materials
G130 Test Method for Calibration of Narrow- and Broad-Band Ultraviolet Radiometers Using a Spectroradiometer
G141 Guide for Addressing Variability in Exposure Testing of Nonmetallic Materials
G147 Practice for Conditioning and Handling of Nonmetallic Materials for Natural and Artificial Weathering Tests
G152 Practice for Operating Open Flame Carbon Arc Light Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials
G153 Practice for Operating Enclosed Carbon Arc Light Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials
G154 Practice for Operating Fluorescent Ultraviolet (UV) Lamp Apparatus for Exposure of Nonmetallic Materials
G155 Practice for Operating Xenon Arc Light Apparatus for Exposure of Non-Metallic Materials
G156 Practice for Selecting and Characterizing Weathering Reference Materials
G169 Guide for Application of Basic Statistical Methods to Weathering Tests
G177 Tables for Reference Solar Ultraviolet Spectral Distributions: Hemispherical on 37° Tilted Surface
2.2 ISO Standards:
ISO 4892, Part 1 Plastics: Exposure to laboratory Light Sources—General Guidance
ISO 9370 Plastics: Instrumental Determination of Radiant Exposure in Weathering Tests—General Guidance and Basic Test
Method
2.3 CIE Document:
CIE Publication Number 85: 1989 Technical Report—Solar Spectral Irradiance
2.4 Other Documents:
IES LM-58-13 Spectroradiometric Measurement Methods for Light Sources (2013 or Later)
NIST SP250-89 Spectral Irradiance Calibrations
2.5 ASTM Adjuncts:
SMARTS2, Simple Model for Atmospheric Transmission of Sunshine
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—The definitions given in Terminologies E41, E772, and G113 are applicable to this practice.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Significance:
4.1.1 When conducting exposures in devices that use laboratory light sources, it is important to consider how well the
accelerated test conditions will reproduce property changes and failure modes associated with end-use environments for the
materials being tested. In addition, it is essential to consider the effects of variability in both the accelerated test and outdoor
exposures when setting up exposure experiments and when interpreting the results from accelerated exposure tests.
4.1.2 No laboratory exposure test can be specified as a total simulation of actual use conditions in outdoor environments. Results
obtained from these laboratory accelerated exposures can be considered as representative of actual use exposures only when the
degree of rank correlation has been established for the specific materials being tested and when the type of degradation is the same.
The relative durability of materials in actual use conditions can be very different in different locations because of differences in
UV radiation, time of wetness, relative humidity, temperature, pollutants, and other factors. Therefore, even if results from a
specific exposure test conducted according to this practice are found to be useful for comparing the relative durability of materials
exposed in a particular exterior environment, it cannot be assumed that they will be useful for determining relative durability of
the same materials for a different environment.
4.1.3 Even though it is very tempting, calculation of an acceleration factor relating x h or megajoules of radiant exposure in
a laboratory accelerated test to y months or years of exterior exposure is not recommended. These acceleration factors are not valid
for several reasons.
4.1.3.1 Acceleration factors are material dependent and can be significantly different for each material and for different
formulations of the same material.
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Available from the Commission Internationale de L’Eclairage, CIE, Central Bureau, Kegelgasse 27, A-1030 Vienna, Austria or the U.S. National Committee for CIE,
National Institute for Science and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD.
Available from Illuminating Engineering Society of North America (IESNA), 120 Wall Street, New York, NY 10005, https://www.ies.org/.
Available from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100 Bureau Dr., Stop 1070, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1070, http://www.nist.gov.
Available from ASTM International Headquarters. Order Adjunct No. ADJG173CD. Original adjunct produced in 2005.
G151 − 19
4.1.3.2 Variability in the rate of degradation in both actual use and laboratory accelerated exposure test can have a significant
effect on the calculated acceleration factor.
4.1.3.3 Acceleration factors calculated based on the ratio of irradiance between a laboratory light source and solar radiation,
even when identical bandpasses are used, do not take into consideration the effects on a material of irradiance, temperature,
moisture, and differences in spectral power distribution between the laboratory light source and solar radiation.
NOTE 4—If use of an acceleration factor is desired in spite of the warnings given in this practice, such acceleration factors for a particular material
are only valid if they are based on data from a sufficient number of separate exterior and laboratory accelerated exposures so that results used to relate
times to failure in each exposure can be analyzed using statistical methods. An example of a statistical analysis using multiple laboratory and exterior
exposures to calculate an acceleration factor is described by J.A. J. A. Simms (1).
4.1.4 There are a number of factors that may decrease the degree of correlation between accelerated tests using laboratory light
sources and exterior exposures. More specific information on how each factor may alter stability ranking of materials is given in
Appendix X1.
4.1.4.1 Differences in the spectral distribution between the laboratory light source and solar radiation.
4.1.4.2 Light intensities higher than those experienced in actual use conditions.
4.1.4.3 Test conditions where specimens are exposed continuously to light when actual use conditions provide alternate periods
of light and dark.
4.1.4.4 Specimen temperatures higher than those in actual conditions.
4.1.4.5 Exposure conditions that produce unrealistic temperature differences between light and dark colored specimens.
4.1.4.6 Exposure conditions that do not have any temperature cycling or that produce temperature cycling, or thermal shock,
or both, that is not representative of use conditions.
4.1.4.7 Unrealistically high or low levels of moisture.
4.1.4.8 Absence of biological agents or pollutants.
4.2 Use of Accelerated Tests with Laboratory Light Sources:
4.2.1 Results from accelerated exposure tests conducted according to this standard are best used to compare the relative
performance of materials. A common application is conducting a test to establish that the level of quality of different batches does
not vary from a control material with known performance. Comparisons between materials are best made when they are tested at
the same time in the same exposure device. Results can be expressed by comparing the exposure time or radiant exposure necessary
to change a characteristic property to some specified level.
4.2.1.1 Reproducibility of test results between laboratories has been shown to be good when the stability of materials is
evaluated in terms of performance ranking compared to other materials or to a control;control (2, 3); therefore, exposure of a
similar material of known performance (a control) at the same time as the test materials is strongly recommended.
4.2.2 In some applications, weathering reference materials are used to establish consistency of the operating conditions in an
exposure test.
4.2.3 Reference materials, for example, blue wool test fabric, also may be used for the purpose of timing exposures. In some
cases, a reference material is exposed at the same time as a test material and the exposure is conducted until there is a defined
change in property of the reference material. The test material then is evaluated. In some cases, the results for the test material are
compared to those for the reference material. These are inappropriate uses of reference materials when they are not sensitive to
exposure stresses that produce failure in the test material or when the reference material is very sensitive to an exposure stress that
has very little effect on the test material.
NOTE 5—Definitions for control and reference material that are appropriate to weathering tests are found in Terminology G113.
NOTE 6—Practice G156 describes procedures for selecting and characterizing weathering reference materials used to establish consistency of operating
conditions in a laboratory accelerated test.
NOTE 7—Results from accelerated exposure tests should only be used to establish a pass/fail approval of materials after a specific time of exposure
to a prescribed set of conditions when the variability in the exposure and property measurement procedure has been quantified so that statistically
significant pass/fail judgments can be made.
5. Requirements for Laboratory Exposure Devices
5.1 Light Source:
5.1.1 The exposure device shall provide for placement of specimens and any designated sensing devices in positions which
provide uniform irradiance by the light source.
NOTE 8—In some devices, several individual light sources are used simultaneously. In these devices, the term light source refers to the combination
of individual light sources being used.
5.1.2 Manufacturers of exposure devices shall assure that the irradiance at any location in the area used for specimen exposures
is at least 70 % of the maximum irradiance measured in this area. Procedures for measuring irradiance uniformity are found in
Annex A1.
The boldface numbers in parentheses refer to the list of references at the end of this standard.
G151 − 19
NOTE 9—During use, the irradiance uniformity in exposure devices can be affected by several factors, such as deposits, which can develop on the
optical system and chamber walls. Irradiance uniformity also can be affected by the type and number of specimens being exposed. The irradiance
uniformity as assured by the manufacturer is valid for new equipment and well defined measuring conditions.
5.1.3 Periodic repositioning of the specimens during exposure is not necessary if the irradiance at positions farthest from the
point of maximum irradiance is at least 90 % of the maximum measured irradiance.
5.1.4 If irradiance at any position in the area used for specimen exposure is between 70 and 90 % of the maximum irradiance,
specimens shall be periodically repositioned to reduce variability in radiant exposure. The repositioning schedule shall be agreed
upon by all interested parties. Appendix X2 describes some possible specimen placement and repositioning plans and frequencies.
NOTE 10—While not required in devices meeting the irradiance uniformity requirements of 5.1.3, periodic specimen repositioning is a good practice
to reduce the variability in exposure stresses experienced during the test interval.
5.1.5 Replace lamps and filters according to the schedule recommended by the device manufacturer. Follow the apparatus
manufacturer’s instructions for lamp and filter replacement and for pre-aging of lamps or filters, or both.
5.1.6 ASTM G177 describes a standard solar ultraviolet spectrum that can be used as a basis for comparing laboratory
accelerated light sources with sunlight. The atmospheric conditions used in this standard solar spectrum were selected to maximize
the fraction of short wavelength solar ultraviolet radiation.
NOTE 11—Previous versions of this standard used a solar spectrum defined in CIE Publication 85-1999,Publication 85-1989, Table 4 as the benchmark
for comparing light sources used in laboratory accelerated exposure tests to solar radiation. Appendix X3 provides a comparison of the atmospheric
conditions and solar spectra of ASTM G177 and Table 4 of CIE 85.
5.1.6.1 Direct radiation from xenon burners, open flame carbon arcs, and some fluorescent lamps contains considerable amounts
of short wavelength ultraviolet radiation not present in solar radiation. With proper selection of filters for these light sources, much
of the short wavelength light can be eliminated. However, with many filters a small, but significant, amount of this short
wavelength (less than 300 nm) radiation is present in the spectral distribution of the filtered light source. Fluorescent UV lamps
can be selected to have a spectral output corresponding to a particular ultraviolet region of solar radiation. The xenon arc, when
appropriately filtered, produces radiation with a spectral power distribution that is a good simulation of average solar radiation
throughout the UV and visible region.
5.1.7 A radiometer, which complies with the requirements outlined in ISO 9370 may be used to measure irradiance, E, or the
spectral irradiance, EThe apparatus should have a means to monitor and control the , and the radiant exposure, H, or the spectral
λ
radiant exposure, H , on the specimen surface.specimen irradiance.
λ
NOTE 12—In apparatus that do not provide irradiance control, the specimen irradiance may vary over time as the source and some optical filters used
to modify its spectral distribution age. This variance may contribute to differences between weathering tests conducted in different apparatus as well as
those conducted in the same apparatus at separate times.
5.1.7.1 If used, the radiometer shall be mounted so that it receives the same irradiance as the specimen surface. If it is not
positioned In apparatus equipped with irradiance control, an irradiance set point control system comprised of an integrated
on-board irradiance sensor coupled with an electronic feedback loop shall operate to maintain the irradiance at the set point. This
control system shall be calibrated to report the irradiance at the specimen plane whether the on-board irradiance sensor is located
within the specimen plane, it shall be calibrated for irradiance at the specimen distance.plane or outside the specimen plane.
5.1.7.2 The irradiance set point control system shall be calibrated at regular intervals relative to an irradiance reference device
(that is, a radiometer or other suitable transfer calibration standard) to assure acceptable accuracy and reliability. The irradiance
set point control system shall be calibrated when replacing any component of the optical system (for example, at each lamp
replacement or filter change) and each time the weathering method is changed. A full calibration of the irradiance set point control
system shall be conducted at least once per year. More frequent calibrations and intermediate checks are recommended.
5.1.7.3 The irradiance reference device shall be calibrated in accordance with ISO 9370 resulting in traceability to a National
Metrology Institute (NMI). This device shall be calibrated at regular intervals to assure acceptable measurement uncertainty,
traceability, and reliability. Refer to the manufacturer’s recommendation for guidance on calibration interval.
NOTE 13—For guidance on good laboratory practices for measurement and calibration of irradiance see IES LM-58-13 and NIST SP250-89.
5.1.7.4 The radiometer shall be calibrated in the emission region of the light source used and shall be traceable to a recognized
national standards body. Calibration of narrow or broad-band ultraviolet radiometers using a spectroradiometer shall be conducted
according to Spectrally selective radiometers within the chain of traceability shall comply with one of the types specified in
ISO 9370. A full calibration of the spectrally selective radiometer shall be conducted in accordance with Test Method G130. The
radiometer shall be calibrated using a light source with the same spectral power distribution as the one that the radiometer will be
used to measure. In addition, the radiometer shall also be calibrated using the same test chamber geometry (that is, lamp to
specimen plane distance and orientation) for which it will be used. Calibration shall be checked according to the radiation
measuring instrument manufacturer’s instructions. A full calibration of the radiometer shall be conducted at least once/year. at least
once per year. More frequent calibrations are recommended.
5.1.7.5 When measured, the irradiance in the The irradiance set point control system and the irradiance reference device shall
be calibrated in terms of irradiance, E wavelength range agreed upon by all interested parties shall be reported. Some apparatus
e
provide for measuring irradiance in a specific wavelength range for example, 300–400 or 300–800 nm, or in a narrow bandpass
G151 − 19
centered around a single wavelength, for example, 340 nm., for a defined wavelength or defined wavelength interval. Common
examples of irradiance control points and spectral ranges used in commercial weathering apparatus include 340 nm, 420 nm,
300-400 nm, and 300-800 nm. Other control points and spectral ranges may be used as agreed upon by all interested parties.
5.2 Temperature:
5.2.1 The surface temperature of exposed materials depends on the ambient temperature, the amount of radiation absorbed, the
emissivity of the specimen, the thermal conduction within the specimen, and the heat transmission between specimen and air or
specimen holder. Since it is not practical to monitor the surface temperature of individual test specimens, a specified black-panel
sensor is used to measure and control temperature within the test chamber. It is strongly recommended that the black panel
temperature sensor be mounted within the specimen exposure area so that it receives the same radiation and cooling conditions
as a flat test panel surface. The black panel also may be located at a fixed distance position different from the test specimens and
calibrated for temperature in the specimen exposure area. This is not recommended, however, because black panels mounted at
a fixed position away from the specimens may not indicate temperatures representative of the test specimens, even if they are
calibrated to record temperature at positions within the specimen exposure area, due to differences in light intensity and movement
of air.
5.2.1.1 The type of mounting used for uninsulated black or white panels (that is, whether the back of the panel is directly
exposed to air or if the panel is placed against a solid metal backing) will have an effect on the conditions in the chamber. Describe
the mounting used for the uninsulated black or white panel in the test report.
NOTE 14—Previous versions of this standard specified an uninsulated black panel with an open back subjected to the air within the exposure chamber.
Tests using a different backing configuration may produce different results. Therefore, if a user wishes to compare to historical exposure results, it is
recommended that the user duplicate the previous backing configuration of the uninsulated black panel.
5.2.2 Exposure devices shall use either an uninsulated black panel (commonly referred to as a black panel thermometer) or an
insulated black panel (commonly referred to as a black standard thermometer) as black panel sensor. Requirements for each type
are found in Annex A2.
5.2.3 The temperature indicated by the uninsulated black-panel or insulated thermometer depends on the irradiance of the
laboratory light source and the temperature and speed of air moving in the test chamber. Uninsulated black-panel temperatures
generally correspond to those for dark coatings on metal panels. Insulated black panel thermometer temperatures generally
correspond to those for the exposed surface of dark samples with poor thermal conductivity. At conditions used in typical exposure
tests, the temperature indicated by an insulated black panel thermometer will be 3–12°C3–12 °C higher than an uninsulated black
panel thermometer. The response time for temperature changes is slightly slower for insulated black panel thermometers compared
to uninsulated black panel thermometers.
5.2.3.1 At low irradiance, the difference between the temperature indicated by an uninsulated black panel or insulated black
panel and the real specimen may be small. When light sources that emit very little infrared radiation are used, there generally will
be very small difference in temperatures indicated by the two types of black panels or between light and dark colored specimens.
NOTE 15—There can be differences in temperature indicated by a single type of black panel thermometer, depending on the specific design of the device
supplied by different manufacturers. Work is being conducted within Subcommittee 6 ISO TC/61 to characterize the differences between the different
types of temperature sensing devices and between temperature sensing devices of the same type.
5.2.4 In order to evaluate the range of surface temperatures of the exposed specimens, the use of an uninsulated or insulated
white panel thermometer is recommended, in addition to the uninsulated black panel or insulated black panel thermometer. In some
cases, temperature of either the uninsulated or insulated white panel thermometer may be used to specify exposure conditions. The
uninsulated or insulated white panel shall be constructed in the same way as the corresponding uninsulated or insulated black panel
thermometer, except for use of a white coating with a good resistance to aging. The reflectance of the white coating between 450
and 800 nm shall be at least 60 % and at least 30 % between 800 and 1500 nm.
5.2.5 When requested, suppliers of insulated or uninsulated black or white panels shall provide certification that the black or
white coating meets the reflectance requirements given in this practice.
5.2.6 Exposure devices that control temperature of a black or white temperature sensor shall be able to maintain fluctuations
at the control point as specified in Annex A3.
5.2.7 Manufacturers of exposure devices shall assure that the temperature of a black or white panel temperature sensor placed
anywhere within the specimen exposure area shall be within 63°C63 °C of the set point temperature for set points up to
70°C70 °C and within 64°C64 °C for set point temperatures above 70°C.70 °C.
5.2.8 The test report shall indicate whether an insulated or uninsulated black or white panel was used. If either type of black
or white panel thermometer is not positioned in the specimen exposure area, the exact position used shall be described in the test
report.
5.2.9 If chamber air temperature is measured, the temperature sensing element shall be shielded from the light source and water
spray. Exposure devices, which control temperature of chamber air shall be able to maintain temperature of chamber air within
63°C63 °C of the set point temperature.
5.2.10 Calibrate thermocouples according to instructions provided by the device manufacturer. If no instructions are provided
by the device manufacture, sheathed thermocouples shall be calibrated according to Method Test Methods E839, and resistance
G151 − 19
thermometers used as the sensing element for black or white panel thermometers shall be calibrated according to Method Test
Methods E644. Unless otherwise specified, devices used to measure temperature shall be calibrated at least annually. Wherever
possible, calibrations should be traceable to a nationally recognized standards agency.
5.3 Humidity and Wetting:
5.3.1 The presence of moisture may have a significant effect on exposure tests. Any apparatus operated according to this
standard, which attempts to simulate the effects of moisture, shall have means for providing moisture to specimens using one or
more of the following methods: humidification of chamber air, formation of condensation, water spray, or immersion. The type and
rate of material degradation can be affected significantly by the method used to provide moisture stress.
5.3.2 The purity of the water used for specimen wetting is very important. Without proper treatment to remove cations, anions,
organics, and particularly silica, exposed specimens will develop spots or stains that do not occur in exterior exposures. Unless
otherwise specified, water used for specimen wetting shall have a maximum of 1 ppm solids and a maximum of 0.2 ppm silica.
If the water used for specimen wetting is above 1 ppm solids, the solids and silica levels must be reported. Recirculation of water
used for specimen wetting is not recommended and if done the recirculated water shall meet the specified purity requirements.
NOTE 16—Distillation, or a combination of deionization and reverse osmosis can effectively produce water with the desired purity.
5.3.3 If specimens are found to have deposits or stains after exposure, the water purity must be checked to determine if it meets
the purity requirements described in 5.3.2. On some occasions, exposed specimens can be contaminated by deposits from bacteria
than can grow in the purified water used for specimen wetting. If bacterial contamination is detected, the entire system used for
specimen wetting shall be flushed with a chlorinating solution, such as sodium hypochlorite and thoroughly rinsed prior to
resuming exposures.
5.3.4 Although it does not always correlate with silica content, it is recommended that the conductivity of the water used for
specimen wetting be monitored continuously and that exposures be stopped whenever the conductivity is above 5 5 μS μS/cm.⁄cm.
5.3.5 All components of the specimen wetting unit shall be fabricated from stainless steel, plastic, or other material that does
not contaminate the water. If plastic materials are used, they shall not leach low molecular weight UV absorbing components into
the water.
5.3.6 In devices where humidity within the test chamber is controlled, sensors used to determine humidity shall be placed within
the test chamber air flow and shielded from direct radiation and water spray. When humidity is controlled, the measured relative
humidity shall be within 6 5 % 65 % of the set point humidity.
5.3.6.1 Calibrate the sensors used to determine humidity according to the device manufacturer’s instructions.
5.3.7 Any device intended to introduce wetting of specimens, for example, by spray or immersion, shall have means to program
intervals with and without wetting.
NOTE 17—There is currently no generally accepted method for characterizing the uniformity or consistency of specimen wetting.
5.4 Other Apparatus Requirements—Although various apparatus designs are used in practice, each apparatus shall include the
following:
5.4.1 Any device intended to provide light and dark cycles shall have means to program intervals with or without light. The time
of each light and dark cycle shall be controlled to within 610 % of the shortest cycle time used. It is preferable to use cycle timers
that are accurate and reproducible as possible. Optionally, means to provide a record of the length of light and dark cycles may
be provided.
5.4.2 To fulfill the requirements of particular test procedures, the apparatus also may need to provide means to register or record
the following operational parameters.
5.4.2.1 Line voltage;
5.4.2.2 Lamp voltage and where appropriate, lamp wattage;
5.4.2.3 Lamp current;
5.4.2.4 Temperature of uninsulated or insulated black or white panel thermometer;
5.4.2.5 Test chamber air temperature;
5.4.2.6 Test chamber relative humidity,humidity;
5.4.2.7 Water spray cycles;
5.4.2.8 Irradiance or radiant exposure, or both, over a specified spectral region; and, and
5.4.2.9 Duration of exposure (radiation time and total, if different).
5.4.3 Follow the recommendations of the device manufacturer regarding calibration of devices used to record each operational
parameter.
6. Test Specimens
6.1 Form and Preparation:
6.1.1 The dimensions of the test specimens normally are those specified in the appropriate test method for the property or
properties to be measured after exposure. When the behavior of a specific type of article is to be determined, the article itself should
be exposed whenever possible.
G151 − 19
6.1.2 For some tests, specimens to be exposed may be cut from a larger sheet or part that is formed by extrusion, injection
molding, or other process. The exact shape and dimensions of the specimens to be exposed will be determined by the specific test
procedure used for measurement of the property of interest. The procedures used to machine or cut individual test specimens from
a larger sheet or part may affect the results of the property measurement and the apparent durability. Therefore, the method used
for specimen preparation shall be agreed upon by the interested parties and should be related closely to the method normally used
to process the material in typical application.
6.1.3 Unless otherwise specified or required, do not cut individual test specimens for property measurement from larger
specimens that have been exposed. The effects any cutting or machining operation may have on the properties of individual test
specimens usually are much larger when the test specimens are cut from a large piece after exposure. This is especially true for
materials that embrittle on exposure.
6.1.3.1 When test specimens are cut from an exposed sheet or larger part, they should be taken from an area that is at least 20
mm from the fixture holding the material or from the exposed specimen edges. In no circumstances shall any material from the
exposed face be removed during the test specimen preparation.
6.1.4 When comparing materials in an exposure test, use test specimens that are similar in dimensions and exposed area.
6.2 Number of Test Specimens:
6.2.1 The number of test specimens for each test condition or exposure period shall be that specified in the appropriate test
method for the property or properties to be measured after exposure.
6.2.2 Unless otherwise specified or required, use at least three replicate specimens where properties are measured using
nondestructive tests and six replicate specimens where properties are measured using destructive tests.
6.2.3 When material properties are measured using destructive tests, a separate set of specimens is needed for each exposure
period. When destructive tests are used, the total number of test specimens required will be determined by the number of exposure
periods used and whether unexposed file specimens are tested at the same time as exposed specimens.
6.2.4 Control materials with known durability should be included with each exposure test. It is recommended that control
materials known to have relatively poor and good durability be used. Control materials are used for the purpose of comparing the
performance of the test materials to the controls. Before laboratory to laboratory comparisons are made it is necessary to establish
agreed upon control materials. The number of specimens of the control material should be the same as that used for test materials.
6.3 Storage and Conditioning:
6.3.1 Conditioning and handling of test, control, reference, and file specimens shall be according to Practice G147.
6.3.2 If test specimens are cut or machined from larger pieces, they should be conditioned after machining according to Practice
D618, SpecificationsSpecification D3924, or Practice E171. In some circumstances, it may be necessary to precondition the sheets
prior to cutting or machining to facilitate specimen preparation. The properties of some materials are very sensitive to moisture
content and the duration of conditioning may need to be longer than those specified in these standards, particularly where
specimens have been exposed to climatic extremes.
7. General Procedure
7.1 Mark each specimen that will be exposed with a unique identifying number in accordance with Practice G147.
7.1.1 Do not touch the surface of exposed specimens or optical components with bare skin because oils that are deposited may
act as UV absorbers or contain contaminants which accelerate degradation.
7.2 Specific conditions and procedures for the exposure test depend on the type of device used and the material being tested.
For open flame carbon-arc, enclosed carbon-arc, fluorescent UV, and xenon-arc exposures, these can be found in Practices G152,
G153, G154, and G155 and in other standards, which reference these practices.
7.2.1 For each exposure test, specific set points for important parameters such as irradiance, temperature, and humidity are used.
Typically, these parameters are measured and controlled at a single position within the chamber. During normal operation, there
is an allowable departure of the measured value from the set point. Annex A3 provides detailed information about the maximum
allowable departure of the measured value from the set point.
7.2.2 A single point measurement does not mean conditions throughout the cabinet are the same. It does not mean two tests run
in similar cabinets will produce the same results. Cabinets that control temperature by the black panel will not produce the same
test as cabinets that control by air temperature.
7.3 Select material properties that exhibit a significant change during the exposure period in order to provide weathering
performance discrimination among a series of materials.
7.4 Follow the procedures described in the appropriate standard for measuring the properties of test specimens before and after
exposure.
7.5 If nondestructive tests are used to measure properties of the materials being tested, measure the properties of specimens
before beginning the exposure. After each exposure increment, measure the same property that is measured initially on the
specimens. Take care to make the property measurement in the same position used for the initial measurement.
G151 − 19
NOTE 18—To monitor the response of the instrument used to measure the desired property, one can measure a calibration standard each time the
instrument is used.
7.6 If destructive tests are used to measure properties of the materials being tested, prepare a separate set of test specimens for
each exposure period. Compare the value of the property after exposure to the property measured on an unexposed set of specimens
measured prior to beginning the exposure. Alternatively, the property can be measured on a separate set of unexposed file
specimens at the same time as the property of exposed specimens is measured. The results for the unexposed filesfile specimens
and from the exposed specimens can then be compared.
NOTE 19—Procedures and formulas for calculating the change in material property of test materials and reference materials after exposure can be found
in Practice D5870.
7.7 Some materials will change color during storage in the dark, particularly after weathering. It is essential that color
measurement or visual comparisons be carried out as soon as possible after exposure once the exposed surface has dried.
8. Periods of Exposure and Evaluation of Test Results
8.1 In most cases, periodic evaluation of test and control materials is necessary to determine the variation in magnitude and
direction of property change as a function of exposure time or radiant exposure.
8.2 The time or radiant exposure necessary to produce a defined change in a material property can be used to evaluate or rank
the stability of materials. This method is preferred over evaluating materials after an arbitrary exposure time or radiant exposure.
8.2.1 Exposure to an arbitrary time or radiant exposure may be used for the purpose of a specific test if agreed upon by the
parties concerned or if required for conformance to a particular specification. When a single exposure period is used, select a time
or radiant exposure that will produce the largest performance differences between the test materials or between the test material
and the control material.
8.2.2 The minimum exposure time used shall be that necessary to produce a substantial change in the property of interest for
the least stable material being evaluated. An exposure time that produces a significant change in one type of material cannot be
assumed to be applicable to other types of materials.
8.2.3 The relation between time to failure in an exposure conducted according to this practice and service life in an outdoor
environment requires determination of a valid acceleration factor. Do not use arbitrary acceleration factors relating time in an
exposure conducted according to this practice and time in an outdoor environment because they can give erroneous information.
The acceleration factor is material dependent and is only valid if it is based on data from a sufficient number of separate exterior
and laboratory accelerated exposures so that results used to relate times to failure in each exposure can be analyzed using statistical
methods.
NOTE 20—An example of a statistical analysis using multiple laboratory and exterior exposures to calculate an acceleration factor is described by J.A.
J. A. Simms (1).
8.3 After each exposure increment, evaluate or rate changes in exposed test specimens according to applicable ASTM test
methods.
8.4 When results from exposures conducted according to this practice are used in specifications, one of the following three
criteria must be met.
8.4.1 If a standard or specification for general use requires a definite property level after a specific time or radiant exposure in
an exposure test conducted according to this practice, base the specified property level on results from round-robin experiments
run to determine the test reproducibility from the exposure and property measurement procedures. Conduct these round-robins
according to Practice E691, and include a statistically representative sample of all laboratories or organizations who would
normally conduct the exposure and property measurement.
8.4.2 If a standard or specification for use between two or three parties requires a definite property level after a specific time
or radiant exposure in an exposure test conducted according to this practice, base the specified property level on two independent
experiments run in each laboratory to determine the reproducibility for the exposure and property measurement process. The
reproducibility of the exposure/property measurement process is then used to determine the minimum level of property after the
exposure that is mutually agreeable to all parties.
8.4.3 When reproducibility in results from an exposure test conducted according to this practice has not been established
through round-robin testing, specify performance requirements for materials in terms of comparison (ranked) to a control material.
All specimens shall be exposed simultaneously in the same device. All concerned parties must agree on the specific control material
used.
8.4.3.1 Conduct analysis of variance to determine whether any differences between test materials and control materials isare
statistically significant. Expose replicates of the test specimen and the control specimen so that statistically significant performance
differences can be determined.
NOTE 21—Fischer illustrates and Ketola illustrate (4) use of rank comparison between test and control ma
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...