SIST EN 15269-4:2025

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2025
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti
za vrata, zapore in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 4. del:
Požarna odpornost steklenih vrat na tečajih z vrtljivim krilom
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware -
Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit
und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer
Baubeschläge - Teil 4: Feuerwiderstand von Drehflügeltüren aus Glas
Application étendue des résultats d’essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou
d’étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 4 : Résistance au feu des blocs-
portes battants et pivotants en verre
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 15269-4:2025
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EN 15269-4
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
October 2025
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50
English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance
and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable
window assemblies, including their elements of building
hardware - Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted
glass doorsets'
Application étendue des résultats d'essais en matière Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen
de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder
blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern
compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 4:
Partie 4 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et Feuerwiderstand von Drehflügeltüren aus Glas
pivotants en verre
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 4 August 2025.

CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2025 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 15269-4:2025 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 6
4 Determination of the field of extended application . 9
4.1 General. 9
4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A . 9
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application . 9
4.4 Analysis of test results . 10
5 Extended application report . 11
6 Classification report. 11
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations . 12
Annex B (normative) Configurations for doorsets incorporating side and/or over panels
................................................................................................................................................................ 100
Annex C (normative) Construction parameter variations - weight . 115
Annex D (normative) Construction parameter variations - timber replacement . 116
Annex E (normative) Test scenarios for Butt joint glazing as supporting construction . 117
Bibliography . 120

European foreword
This document (EN 15269-4:2025) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety
in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by April 2026, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by April 2026.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document has been prepared under a standardization request addressed to CEN by the European
Commission. The Standing Committee of the EFTA States subsequently approves these requests for its
Member States.
This document is one of a series entitled EN 15269 or EN 17020. A list of all parts in the EN 15269 and
the EN 17020 series can be found on the CEN website.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and the United
Kingdom.
Introduction
This document is one of the EN 15269 and EN 17020 series of standards to be used for the purpose of
producing an extended application report based on the evaluation of one or more fire resistance and/or
smoke control and/or durability of self-closing tests. These standards may also be used to identify the
best selection of test specimens required to cover a wide range of product variations.
A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be
improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations need to be made on the basis of retaining
the fire resistance and/or smoke control and/or durability of self-closing classification(s) obtained from
testing to the relevant test standard. However, this will never lead to an increased classification for any
specific performance parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified
in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation Table within this document.
For general requirements for applying this standard see EN 15269-1.
1 Scope
This document is applicable to hinged and pivoted doors, doorsets and door assemblies with glass based
leaves. Throughout this document the term “doorset” will be used to cover doors, doorsets and door
assemblies. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from fire
resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover all or some
of the following examples:
— integrity (E), integrity and radiation (EW) or integrity and insulation (EI or EI ) classification;
1 2
— ambient temperature smoke control (Sa) and medium temperature smoke control (S )
classifications;
— ability to close and durability of self-closing (C0 – C5);
— glazed elements;
— side, transom or over panels;
— items of building hardware;
— decorative and protective finishes;
— intumescent seals and non-intumescent (e.g. smoke, draught or acoustic) seals;
— alternative supporting construction(s).
This document does not apply to horizontal doorsets and windows.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 1191, Windows and doors — Resistance to repeated opening and closing — Test method
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests — Part 1: General requirements
EN 1364-1, Fire resistance tests for non-loadbearing elements — Part 1: Walls
EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies,
openable windows and elements of building hardware — Part 1: Fire resistance test for door and shutter
assemblies and openable windows
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and
elements of building hardware — Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building
hardware
EN 1634-3, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware — Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 1935, Building hardware — Single-axis hinges — Requirements and test methods
EN 12150-1:2015, Glass in building — Thermally toughened soda lime silicate safety glass — Part 1:
Definition and description
EN 12519, Windows and pedestrian doors — Terminology
EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification
using data from fire resistance and/or smoke control tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 15269-1, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware — Part 1: General
requirements
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety — Vocabulary (ISO 13943)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1363-1, EN 12519,
EN ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, EN 1634-2, EN 1634-3, EN 1191 and EN 15269-1 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
most onerous configuration
configuration with the lowest relevant performance in terms of mode of failure and/or highest distortion
and evaluated taking the intended construction parameter variation(s) into account
Note 1 to entry: For example if the construction parameter variation involves a change to glazing or side panel and
over panel configurations then the previous result where these have been tested would need to be used to make the
evaluation of most onerous.
3.2
effective rebate depth
dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame,
transom or side panel or flush over panel
Note 1 to entry: Example shown in Figure 1
a) before test b) during test
Key
x1 effective rebate depth
a distortion during the test
x2/x1 level of distortion
Figure 1 — Example for effective rebate depth and calculation of level of distortion
3.3
hybrid frame
frame constructed of a steel core material, cladded with insulating inorganic materials (e.g. gypsum)
3.4
doorset without frame
door leaf directly installed in the supporting construction
Note 1 to entry: Low or high density rigid supporting construction or a previously tested non-standard supporting
construction)
3.5
representative specimen
similar design
fundamentally the same
door leaf design which has ‘fundamentally the same’ or ‘similar’ construction as another door leaf design
for the purpose of evaluating parameter variations providing the relevant aspects of tested performance
are considered
Note 1 to entry: see EN 15269-1 for further guidance on evaluation of similar/fundamentally the same
3.6
full scale test
test of a doorset in accordance with EN 1634-1
3.7
small scale test
test on elements of building hardware in accordance with EN 1634-2 and where the decision process,
given in EN 1634-2, permits its use
3.8
basic test
test or a set of tests against which the changes are evaluated
3.9
cladding material
non-structural materials added to provide an aesthetical finish
3.10
faces and sides of a door leaf
surfaces of a door leaf
Note 1 to entry: Example shown in Figure 2.

Key
1 opening face
2 closing face
3 lock side
4 hinge side
5 top side
6 bottom side
Figure 2 — faces and sides of a door leaf
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, a representative doorset shall have
been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191 to achieve a test result
which generates a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification
subsequently required from extended application considerations.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may
be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining
the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191, including
those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any
specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test, unless specifically identified in the relevant
Construction Parameter Variation Tables.
4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any part of the classified product cannot be
covered by the extended application rules then that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report, if not tested. Additional test(s) shall be performed in full scale
test with a representative specimen.
4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s), which are required to be covered by an
extended application report.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of
Annex A.
4.2.3 For the required performance characteristic(s) in column (3) establish from the contents of column
(4) of Annex A whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application rules (DIAP)
in EN 1634-1 and/or EN 1634-3 and/or EN 1191 without the need for further testing.
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible, it can be recorded in the extended application report together
with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) of Annex A.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test
should be made on a representative specimen type i.e. a doorset of the same or most onerous
configuration. Alternatively, column (5) of Annex A identifies an option for alternative testing and
relevant test parameters.
4.2.6 Most onerous configuration shall be the one with the lowest relevant performance in terms of mode
of failure and/or highest distortion but shall also be evaluated taking the intended construction
parameter variation(s) into account. For example if the construction parameter variation involves a
change to glazing or side panel and over panel configurations then the previous result where these have
been tested would need to be used to make the evaluation of most onerous.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide an extended field of application for a particular performance characteristic
from a single test (for fire resistance and smoke control of an asymmetrical doorset only for the face
tested). However, where a manufacturer envisages to manufacture a range of doorsets incorporating
single leaf doorsets and also double leaf doorsets with or without side, transom or over panels, with
alternative item of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the
complete range of doorset designs and options. This helps to minimize the testing required before testing
commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations, which are required to be part of the product range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many as
possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first fire resistance, smoke control and/or durability of self-closing test or a series of
tests and then establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the
fire resistance, smoke control and/or durability of self-closing tests, including direct application
possibilities of the relevant test standard(s).
4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible
without further testing.
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in
column (4) in Annex A.
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of
direct application of the relevant test standard(s) or the initial field of extended application derived from
4.3.5.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also include
double leaf configurations. Where only single leaf doorsets are to be part of the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single
leaf doorset. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the
outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may
be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or, in the most onerous option, as defined
in column 4 of Table A.1 to Table A.5, double leaf doorset configurations. See also Annex B.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A
and observe from column (5) in Annex A which are the most appropriate, most onerous specimen options
for further testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests
completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated
with the additional product variations incorporated for the required performance characteristic(s).
4.4 Analysis of test results
4.4.1 In order to maximize the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall
record details of any failure occurred throughout the duration of the test, as well as details of any
significant distortion.
4.4.2 Where a series of tests forms the basis for the extended application, the field of extended application
shall be based on the lowest performance of each performance characteristic achieved from the complete
series of tests unless premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction
parameter variations.
4.4.3 Where it has been possible to clearly identify specific parameter failures, the extended application
for all other construction parameter variations may be based on the performance achieved after isolating
the premature failure(s), provided the requirements of Clause 4.1.1 is met. Where the specific
Construction Parameter variation requires EN 1634-1 Category B performance and where failures can be
identified as having no relevance to this aspect of the construction, they shall be disregarded and the
failure time and associated Category revised accordingly.
5 Extended application report
Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of EN 15269-1, based on
the results of evaluations in accordance with the above.
When additional test data based on similar designs (within a product family) are used to extend the field
of application, the rationale for using the test data should be mentioned in the EXAP report.
6 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and
presented in accordance with EN 13501-2.
Annex A
(normative)
Construction parameter variations
A.1 General
This Table is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance, smoke control and
durability of self-closing testing of hinged or pivoted doorsets with glass-based leaves.
This Table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive test
according:
— fire resistance test to EN 1634-1 (for fire resistance characteristics) and/or;
— smoke control test to EN 1634-3 (for smoke control characteristics) and/or;
— durability of self-closing test to EN 1191 (for durability of the self-closing characteristics),
has generated a classification according to EN 13501-2. Only results from tests in accordance with
European standards can be used as basis for extended application.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.
Column (3) determines the particular performance characteristic (abbreviated as “P.C.” in the header of
column 3) as follows:
— F for fire resistance characteristics;
— S for smoke control characteristics;
— D for durability of the self-closing characteristics.
For some parameters of fire resistance characteristics, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen
displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the case, the following
levels shall be used to establish high, medium and low distortion doorsets as measured using the
maximum relative movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf and door frame or
between the meeting edges of door leaves or the relative movement of the framing members for panelled
systems. The measurements shall be taken from the start of the test at any time during the complete
required classification period. The deflections shall be measured at the positions given in EN 1634-1:
— Low: < 40 % of effective rebate depth;
— Medium: ≥ 40 % and ≤ 85 % of effective rebate depth;
— High: > 85 % of effective rebate depth.
The evaluation of the influence of a parameter variation on performance characteristics (E/EW/EI) lead
to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application, the results of which are
given in column 5. In certain cases in column 5, it is a requirement to achieve Category B; the
requirements for this are given in EN 1634-1.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, column (5) defines the test scenario to be used for
each characteristic F, S and D. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one
configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce
the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single action doorsets to
double action doorsets.
Where an additional test is defined in column 5, this test could be a single or double action doorset if not
mentioned otherwise.
Where additional tests from both faces of the doorset are required, this is defined in column (5) explicitly.
In case of fire resistance (F) for symmetrical doors, only one test is sufficient. In the case of smoke control
characteristics (S) one specimen can be used for tests of both faces.
In order to maximize the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests, the
parameter changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each
parameter are dependent on the classification required and the preferred options.
Test evidence of test according to EN 1364-1 could not be used for the door leaf.
Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also be
taken into account.
Whenever the weight of the door leaf is higher than tested according to EN 1191 the requirements of
Annex C have to be fulfilled if durability of self-closing is considered.
Test scenarios for tests on fire resistance according to EN 1634-1: The following test scenarios are
defined and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Additional test single or double leaf doorset.
Test scenario FA:
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
Additional test single or double leaf doorset
Test scenario FB:
Additional test single or double leaf doorset.
Test scenario FC:
If the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the
additional test shall be a double leaf doorset
Test scenario FD: For single leaf doorsets additional test single or double leaf doorset.
For double leaf doorsets additional test double leaf doorset.
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
Single leaf doorset from most onerous side for single leaf doors, double leaf
Test scenario FE:
doorset from most onerous side for double leaf doors
For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf doorset, for double leaf doorsets
Test scenario FF:
additional test double leaf doorset.
For use in flexible construction, test should be performed in a flexible supporting
construction.
Test from the most onerous side based on test results as given by basic tests.
For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset, for
Test scenario FG:
double leaf doorsets additional test double leaf doorset
Test scenarios for smoke control tests according to EN 1634-3: The following test scenarios are defined
and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Test scenario SA: Test shall be performed with a single or double leaf door
Test scenario SB: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a single leaf door.
Test scenario SC: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a double leaf door.
Test scenario SD: Test shall be performed from the most onerous side with a double leaf doorset
for single or double leaf doorsets or with a single leaf doorset for single leaf
doorsets
Test scenario SE: Test shall be performed from the most onerous side with a single leaf doorset
for single leaf doorsets or a double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets
respectively
Test scenario SF: Tests shall be performed from both sides with a single leaf doorset for single leaf
doorsets or a double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets respectively. If the
double leaf doorset test leads to a leakage of ≤ 20 m /h, this test is sufficient for
single leaf doorsets as well.
Test scenarios for durability of self-closing tests according to EN 1191: The following test scenarios are
defined and referred to in column (5) of Tables A.1- A6:
Test scenario DA: Test shall be performed with a single or double leaf door
Test scenario DB: Tests shall be performed with a single leaf door.
Test scenario DC: Tests shall be performed with a double leaf door.
Test scenario DD: Test should be a double leaf doorset for single and double leaf doorsets, or
single leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets.
Test scenario DE: Test should be a single leaf doorset for single and double leaf doorsets, or
double leaf doorset for double leaf doorsets.
Test scenario DF: Test should be a single leaf doorset for single leaf doorsets and a double leaf
doorset for double leaf doorsets
A.2 Construction parameter variations for fire resistance (F), smoke control (S) and durability of self-closing (D)
characteristics
A.2.1 Door leaf
In certain cases, the rules given in Clause A are also appropriate to side, transom and over panels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly
indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction.
Table A.1 — Construction parameter variations – Clause A – Door leaf
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1 General
A.1.1 Number of leaves. A.1.1.1 Single leaf F Not possible without additional test. Test should be a single
doorset from leaf doorset.
double leaf doorset
Single action doorset:
test.
Test should be done
from opening and
closing face giving a
basic test.
double action doorset:
one test is sufficient
S Not possible without additional test. Test scenario SB
D Possible -
A.1.2 Number of leaves. A.1.2.1 Double leaf F Not possible without additional test. Test should be a
doorset from single double leaf doorset.
leaf doorset test.
Single action doorset:
Test should be done
from opening and
closing face giving a
basic test.
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
double action doorset:
one test is sufficient
S Not possible without additional test. Test scenario SC
D Possible for doorsets where both leaf could close independently Test scenario DD
(without mechanical restriction at the meeting edge), otherwise not
possible without additional test.
A.1.3 Opening A.1.3.1 Single action F Not possible without an basic test according A.1.1 and A.1.2 Single leaf doorsets see
to double action A.1.1, double leaf
and vice versa doorsets see A.1.2
S Not possible without additional test. Single leaf doorsets see
A.1.1, double leaf
doorsets see A.1.2
D Not possible without additional test. Test scenario DD.
A.1.4 Shape of doorset A.1.4.1 From tested F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FE
rectangular into an
NOTE for doorsets with
oblique cut
side and top light see
(chamfered form), a
Clause D
round arch or
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
segment arch on
the top
D Possible -
A.1.4.2 From tested F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FE
an oblique cut
NOTE for doorsets with
(chamfered form), a
side and top light see
round arch or
Clause D
segment arch on
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
the top into
rectangular
D Possible -
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.5 Non intumescent seals A.1.5.1 Add / F Not possible to add a seal. Further test to prove
between frame and door leaf Increase the leaf to frame detail
Possible to increase the seal up to a maximum of 20 % and providing
/ leaves (draught / smoke / with a seal fitted or
the gap is not increased and the expansion of any intumescent seal is
acoustic etc.) - (Reaction to with the maximum size
not affected
fire class A1 or A2) e.g. of seal. Test scenario
ceramic products (fitted in FC
leaf or frame).
S Possible -
D Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario DD.
A.1.5.2 Remove / F Not possible to remove a seal. Further test to prove
Decrease the leaf to frame detail
Possible to decrease the seal up to a maximum of 20 % and providing
with no seal fitted or
the gap is not increased and the expansion of any intumescent seal is
with the minimum size
not affected
of seal. Test scenario
FC
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
D Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario DD.
A.1.5.3 Change F Any movement possible providing no modifications of the construction Test scenario FC
location are required and providing the gap is not increased,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
D Possible -
A.1.5.4 Change F Possible -
manufacturer /
S Possible -
Supplier
D Possible -
F Possible -
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.5.5 Change of S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
material
D Possible up to a maximum of ± 15 % in density Test scenario DF
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.1.5.6 Different F Alternative shape is possible provided the material remain the same, Additional test to
shape the rules for dimensions are fulfilled and providing the gap is not include the required
increased seal. Test scenario FB
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
D Possible up to maximum of 15 % in any dimension and up to a Test scenario DD.
maximum of 10 % in mass
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.1.6 Non intumescent seals A.1.6.1 Change of F Possible -
between frame and door leaf manufacturer /
S Possible -
/ leaves (draught / smoke / supplier
acoustic etc.) - (Reaction to
D Possible -
fire less than class A1 or A2)
A.1.6.2 Change of F Not possible without additional test Additional test to
(fitted in leaf or frame).
material include the required
seal. Test scenario FC
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
D Possible up to a maximum of ± 15 % in density Test scenario DF
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.1.6.3 Change of F Any movement possible providing no modifications of the construction Test scenario FC
location are required and providing the gap is not increased,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
D Possible -
A.1.6.4 Change of F Alternative shape is possible provided the material remain the same, Additional test to
shape the size is not changed more than 15 % in any dimension, the mass is include the required
not changed more than 10 % and the gap is not increased seal. Test scenario FB.
otherwise not possible without additional test
S Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario SF
D Possible up to maximum of 15 % in any dimension and up to a Test scenario DD
maximum of 10 % in mass
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.1.6.5 F Not possible without additional test. Test scenario FA
Add/Increase
S Possible to add. Test scenario SF
Possible to increase number if original tested smoke seal is not
interfered, otherwise not possible without additional test.
D Not possible without an additional test. Not possible without
an additional test.
A.1.7 Latched condition for A.1.7.1 Change in F No change possible for EI doors. Additional test to
single and double leaf latching condition include the required
Extension to latch/lock unlatched or latched possible for E or EW
doorsets when tested latched condition
doorsets if latch/lock is all metal construction,
without a lock
otherwise not possible without an additional test
S Possible to latch/lock unlatched or latched, if any cut out and/or Test scenario SF
through going holes are sealed properly
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario DD.

F Possible to extend to latch/lock unlatched or latched. -
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.1.7.2 Change in S Possible to extend to latch/lock unlatched or latched. -
latching condition
D Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario DD.
when tested with a
latch/lock but
unlatched
A.1.7.3 Change in F No change possible without an additional test Additional test to
latching condition include the required
when tested with a latched condition
latch/lock latched
S No change possible without an additional test Test scenario SF
D Possible to unlatched lock or without lock -
A.2 Size variations
A.2.1 Size (area, width, A.2.1.1 Decrease F E and EW unlimited reduction is Possible, Test scenario FF
height) all distortions
EI: possible to decrease to a minimum dimension of the glass as it is
mentioned in rule E.2.2, otherwise not possible without an additional
test
S Possible -
D Possible -
A.2.2 Height – all distortions A.2.2.1 Increase F Not possible without an additional test Test scenario FF
S Possible for latched doors to increase up to 15 % but not more than Test scenario SF
150 mm, if less than 50 % of the classification limit is reached,
otherwise not possible without an additional test,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Possible by a maximum of 80 % providing the requirements of Annex C Test scenario DD.
are fulfilled,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.2.3 Width - all distortions A.2.3.1 Increase F Not possible without an additional test Test scenario FF
S Possible for latched doors to increase up to 15 % but not more than Test scenario SF
150 mm, if less than 50 % of the classification limit is reached,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Possible by a maximum of 25 % providing that the requirements of Test scenario DD.
Annex C are fulfilled,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.2.4 Area - all distortions A.2.4.1 Increase F Not possible without an additional test Test scenario FF
S Possible in line with A.2.2 and A.2.3 which can be combined, but not Test scenario SF
more than 20 % in area
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Possible in line with A.2.2 and A.2.3, which can be combined, Test scenario DD.
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.3 Materials and constructions
A.3.1 Type of adhesive for A.3.1.1 Change of F Possible for product conforming same product standard and same class, Test scenario FA
adhesion of hardware, manufacturer / otherwise not possible without an additional test
fittings and intumescent supplier
S Possible -
materials
D Possible -
A.3.2 Additional overlapping A.3.2.1 Add F Possible providing the tested overlapping edge at the top of the leaf is Test scenario FA
edge at the bottom of the added at the bottom of the leaf and providing a fourth frame member is
See Figure A.1
door leaf added, otherwise not possible without an additional test
S For S : Possible Test scenario SF
a
For S : Possible if sealing at the bottom is not changed,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
D Possible -
A.3.2.2 Remove F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FA
See Figure A.2
S Possible for S Test scenario SF
a
Not possible for S without an additional test
D Possible -
A.3.3 Type of intumescent A.3.3.1 Change of F Possible -
seals (leaf or frame fitted) supplier /
S Possible -
manufacturer
D Possible -
A.3.3.2 Change of F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FD
material
S Possible -
D Possible -
A.3.3.3 Add F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FD
S Possible -
D Possible -
A.3.3.4 Remove F Not possible without an additional test. Test scenario FD
S Possible -
D Possible -
Construction Parameter Variation P.C. Possibility of extension Additional Evidence
Required (5)
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.4 Decorative and / or protective finishes
A.4.1 Paints without A.4.1.1 Addition F Possible in line with direct application, beyond the field of direct Test scenario FB
contribution to fire application rules not possible without an additional
resistance (on leaf or frame)
test
S Possible, but when in contact with a seal only possible with a smooth Test scenario SF
finish,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Possible -
A.4.2 Paints without A.4.2.1 Interchange F Possible -
contribution to fire
S Possible, but when in contact with a seal only possible with a smooth Test scenario SF
resistance (on leaf or frame)
finish,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
D Possible -
A.4.3 Enamelled glass. A.4.3.1 Add F Not possi
...