ISO 22664:2016

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 22664
Third edition
2016-11-15
Space data and information transfer
systems — TC (telecommand) space data
link protocol
Systèmes de transfert des données et informations spatiales —
Protocole de liaison pour données spatiales TC (télécommande)
Reference number
©
ISO 2016
©  ISO 2016
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission.
Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8  CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2. www.iso.org/directives
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of any patent
rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or on the ISO list of
patent declarations received. www.iso.org/patents
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity assessment,
as well as information about ISO's adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT)
see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary information
ISO 22664 was prepared by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (as CCSDS
232.0-B-3, September 2015) and was adopted (without modifications except those stated in clause 2 of this
International Standard) by Technical Committee ISO/TC 20, Aircraft and space vehicles, Subcommittee
SC 13, Space data and information transfer systems.
This third edition cancels and replaces the second edition (ISO 22664:2013), which has been technically
revised. It also incorporates the amendment ISO 22664:2013/Amd.1:2015.
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
STATEMENT OF INTENT
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) is an organization officially
established by the management of its members. The Committee meets periodically to address
data systems problems that are common to all participants, and to formulate sound technical
solutions to these problems. Inasmuch as participation in the CCSDS is completely voluntary,
the results of Committee actions are termed Recommended Standards and are not
considered binding on any Agency.
This Recommended Standard is issued by, and represents the consensus of, the CCSDS
members. Endorsement of this Recommendation is entirely voluntary. Endorsement,
however, indicates the following understandings:
o Whenever a member establishes a CCSDS-related standard, this standard will be in
accord with the relevant Recommended Standard. Establishing such a standard
does not preclude other provisions which a member may develop.
o Whenever a member establishes a CCSDS-related standard, that member will
provide other CCSDS members with the following information:
-- The standard itself.
-- The anticipated date of initial operational capability.
-- The anticipated duration of operational service.
o Specific service arrangements shall be made via memoranda of agreement. Neither
this Recommended Standard nor any ensuing standard is a substitute for a
memorandum of agreement.
No later than five years from its date of issuance, this Recommended Standard will be
reviewed by the CCSDS to determine whether it should: (1) remain in effect without change;
(2) be changed to reflect the impact of new technologies, new requirements, or new
directions; or (3) be retired or canceled.
In those instances when a new version of a Recommended Standard is issued, existing
CCSDS-related member standards and implementations are not negated or deemed to be non-
CCSDS compatible. It is the responsibility of each member to determine when such
standards or implementations are to be modified. Each member is, however, strongly
encouraged to direct planning for its new standards and implementations towards the later
version of the Recommended Standard.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page ii September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
FOREWORD
This document is a technical Recommendation for use in developing flight and ground
systems for space missions and has been prepared by the Consultative Committee for Space
Data Systems (CCSDS). The TC Space Data Link Protocol described herein is intended for
missions that are cross-supported between Agencies of the CCSDS.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the
subject of patent rights. CCSDS has processes for identifying patent issues and for securing
from the patent holder agreement that all licensing policies are reasonable and non-
discriminatory. However, CCSDS does not have a patent law staff, and CCSDS shall not be
held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or
modification of this document may occur. This Recommended Standard is therefore subject
to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in
Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems
(CCSDS A02.1-Y-4). Current versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS
Web site:
http://www.ccsds.org/
Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be sent to the CCSDS
Secretariat at the e-mail address indicated on page i.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page iii September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
At time of publication, the active Member and Observer Agencies of the CCSDS were:
Member Agencies
– Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI)/Italy.
– Canadian Space Agency (CSA)/Canada.
– Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)/France.
– China National Space Administration (CNSA)/People’s Republic of China.
– Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)/Germany.
– European Space Agency (ESA)/Europe.
– Federal Space Agency (FSA)/Russian Federation.
– Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)/Brazil.
– Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)/Japan.
– National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/USA.
– UK Space Agency/United Kingdom.
Observer Agencies
– Austrian Space Agency (ASA)/Austria.
– Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BFSPO)/Belgium.
– Central Research Institute of Machine Building (TsNIIMash)/Russian Federation.
– China Satellite Launch and Tracking Control General, Beijing Institute of Tracking and
Telecommunications Technology (CLTC/BITTT)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Space Technology (CAST)/China.
– Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)/Australia.
– Danish National Space Center (DNSC)/Denmark.
– Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Aeroespacial (DCTA)/Brazil.
– Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)/Korea.
– European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
(EUMETSAT)/Europe.
– European Telecommunications Satellite Organization (EUTELSAT)/Europe.
– Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA)/Thailand.
– Hellenic National Space Committee (HNSC)/Greece.
– Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)/India.
– Institute of Space Research (IKI)/Russian Federation.
– KFKI Research Institute for Particle & Nuclear Physics (KFKI)/Hungary.
– Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)/Korea.
– Ministry of Communications (MOC)/Israel.
– National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)/Japan.
– National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/USA.
– National Space Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan (NSARK)/Kazakhstan.
– National Space Organization (NSPO)/Chinese Taipei.
– Naval Center for Space Technology (NCST)/USA.
– Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)/Turkey.
– South African National Space Agency (SANSA)/Republic of South Africa.
– Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO)/Pakistan.
– Swedish Space Corporation (SSC)/Sweden.
– Swiss Space Office (SSO)/Switzerland.
– United States Geological Survey (USGS)/USA.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page iv September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Document Title Date Status
CCSDS TC Space Data Link Protocol, September Original Issue, superseded
232.0-B-1 Recommended Standard, Issue 1 2003
CCSDS TC Space Data Link Protocol, September Issue 2, superseded
232.0-B-2 Recommended Standard, Issue 2 2010
CCSDS TC Space Data Link Protocol, September Current issue:
232.0-B-3 Recommended Standard, Issue 3 2015 – adds specifications to
support the Space
Data Link Security
Protocol;
– removes obsolete
informative annex
detailing changes from
Historical
Recommendation
CCSDS 202.0-B-3-S
(1987–2005).
NOTE – Substantive changes from the previous issue are marked by change bars in the
inside margin.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page v September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION. 1-1

1.1 PURPOSE . 1-1
1.2 SCOPE . 1-1
1.3 APPLICABILITY . 1-1
1.4 RATIONALE . 1-2
1.5 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE . 1-2
1.6 CONVENTIONS AND DEFINITIONS . 1-2
1.7 REFERENCES . 1-5

2 OVERVIEW . 2-1

2.1 CONCEPT OF TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL . 2-1
2.2 OVERVIEW OF SERVICES . 2-5
2.3 OVERVIEW OF FUNCTIONS . 2-12
2.4 SERVICES ASSUMED FROM LOWER LAYERS . 2-16

3 SERVICE DEFINITION. 3-1

3.1 OVERVIEW . 3-1
3.2 SOURCE DATA. 3-1
3.3 MAP PACKET SERVICE . 3-3
3.4 VIRTUAL CHANNEL PACKET SERVICE . 3-9
3.5 MAP ACCESS SERVICE . 3-15
3.6 VIRTUAL CHANNEL ACCESS SERVICE . 3-20
3.7 VIRTUAL CHANNEL FRAME SERVICE . 3-25
3.8 MASTER CHANNEL FRAME SERVICE . 3-28
3.9 COP MANAGEMENT SERVICE . 3-31

4 PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION WITHOUT SDLS OPTION . 4-1

4.1 PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (TC TRANSFER FRAME) . 4-1
4.2 PROTOCOL DATA UNIT (CLCW) . 4-12
4.3 PROTOCOL PROCEDURES AT THE SENDING END . 4-18
4.4 PROTOCOL PROCEDURES AT THE RECEIVING END . 4-28

5 MANAGED PARAMETERS WITHOUT SDLS OPTION . 5-1

5.1 MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR A PHYSICAL CHANNEL . 5-1
5.2 MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR A MASTER CHANNEL . 5-2
5.3 MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR A VIRTUAL CHANNEL. 5-2
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page vi September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
CONTENTS (continued)
Section Page
5.4 MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR A MAP CHANNEL . 5-4
5.5 MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR PACKET TRANSFER . 5-4

6 PROTOCOL SPECIFICATION WITH SDLS OPTION . 6-1

6.1 OVERVIEW . 6-1
6.2 USE OF SDLS PROTOCOL . 6-1
6.3 TC TRANSFER FRAME WITH SDLS . 6-1
6.4 SENDING-END PROTOCOL PROCEDURES WITH SDLS . 6-5
6.5 RECEIVING-END PROTOCOL PROCEDURES WITH SDLS . 6-8
6.6 ADDITIONAL MANAGED PARAMETERS FOR SDLS . 6-11

ANNEX A ACRONYMS (INFORMATIVE) . A-1
ANNEX B INFORMATIVE REFERENCES (INFORMATIVE) .B-1
Figure
1-1 Bit Numbering Convention . 1-5
2-1 Relationship with OSI Layers . 2-1
2-2 Relationships Between Channels . 2-4
2-3 Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End). 2-13
2-4 Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Receiving End) . 2-13
2-5 TC Space Data Link Protocol Channel Tree . 2-14
4-1 TC Transfer Frame Structural Components . 4-1
4-2 Transfer Frame Primary Header. 4-2
4-3 Segment Header . 4-7
4-4 Logic Diagram of the Encoder . 4-11
4-5 Logic Diagram of the Decoder . 4-12
4-6 Communications Link Control Word . 4-13
4-7 Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Sending End). 4-18
4-8 Abstract Model of MAP Packet Processing Function . 4-20
4-9 Example of MAP Packet Processing Procedures. 4-20
4-10 Abstract Model of MAP Generation Function. 4-21
4-11 Example of MAP Generation Procedures . 4-21
4-12 Abstract Model of MAP Multiplexing Function . 4-22
4-13 Abstract Model of VC Packet Processing Function . 4-23
4-14 Example of VC Packet Processing Procedures . 4-23
4-15 Abstract Model of Virtual Channel Generation Function . 4-24
4-16 Abstract Model of Virtual Channel Multiplexing Function . 4-25
4-17 Abstract Model of Master Channel Multiplexing Function . 4-26
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page vii September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TM SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
CONTENTS (continued)
Figure Page
4-18 Abstract Model of All Frames Generation Function . 4-27
4-19 Internal Organization of Protocol Entity (Receiving End) . 4-28
4-20 Abstract Model of MAP Packet Extraction Function . 4-29
4-21 Abstract Model of MAP Reception Function . 4-30
4-22 Abstract Model of MAP Demultiplexing Function . 4-30
4-23 Abstract Model of VC Packet Extraction Function . 4-31
4-24 Abstract Model of Virtual Channel Reception Function . 4-32
4-25 Abstract Model of Virtual Channel Demultiplexing Function . 4-33
4-26 Abstract Model of Master Channel Demultiplexing Function . 4-34
4-27 Abstract Model of All Frames Reception Function . 4-35
6-1 SDLS Fields in a Type-D Transfer Frame with a Segment Header . 6-2
6-2 SDLS Fields in a Type-D Transfer Frame without a Segment Header . 6-2
6-3 Order of Processing between TC, COP-1, and SDLS Functions . 6-6
Table
2-1 Summary of Services Provided by TC Space Data Link Protocol . 2-8
4-1 Interpretation of the Bypass and Control Command Flags . 4-4
4-2 Interpretation of the Sequence Flags . 4-8
5-1 Managed Parameters for a Physical Channel . 5-1
5-2 Managed Parameters for a Master Channel . 5-2
5-3 Managed Parameters for a Virtual Channel . 5-3
5-4 Managed Parameters for a MAP Channel . 5-4
5-5 Managed Parameters for Packet Transfer . 5-4
6-1 Additional Managed Parameters for a Virtual Channel without Segment
Headers When TC Space Data Link Protocol Supports SDLS . 6-11
6-2 Additional Managed Parameters for a MAP When TC Space Data Link
Protocol Supports SDLS . 6-11
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page viii September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this Recommended Standard is to specify the Telecommand (TC) Space Data
Link Protocol. This protocol is a Data Link Layer protocol (see reference [1]) to be used over
ground-to-space or space-to-space communications links by space missions.
1.2 SCOPE
This Recommended Standard defines the TC Space Data Link Protocol in terms of:
a) the services provided to the users of this protocol;
b) the protocol data units employed by the protocol; and
c) the procedures performed by the protocol.
It does not specify:
a) individual implementations or products;
b) the implementation of service interfaces within real systems;
c) the methods or technologies required to perform the procedures; or
d) the management activities required to configure and control the protocol.
1.3 APPLICABILITY
This Recommended Standard applies to the creation of Agency standards and to future data
communications over space links between CCSDS Agencies in cross-support situations. The
Recommended Standard includes comprehensive specification of the services and protocol
for inter-Agency cross support. It is neither a specification of, nor a design for, real systems
that may be implemented for existing or future missions.
The Recommended Standard specified in this document is to be invoked through the normal
standards programs of each CCSDS Agency and is applicable to those missions for which
cross support based on capabilities described in this Recommended Standard is anticipated.
Where mandatory capabilities are clearly indicated in sections of the Recommended
Standard, they must be implemented when this document is used as a basis for cross support.
Where options are allowed or implied, implementation of these options is subject to specific
bilateral cross support agreements between the Agencies involved.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-1 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
1.4 RATIONALE
The CCSDS believes it is important to document the rationale underlying the
recommendations chosen, so that future evaluations of proposed changes or improvements
will not lose sight of previous decisions.
1.5 DOCUMENT STRUCTURE
This document is divided into six numbered sections and three annexes:
a) section 1 presents the purpose, scope, applicability and rationale of this
Recommended Standard and lists the conventions, definitions, and normative
references used throughout the Recommended Standard;
b) section 2 provides an overview of the TC Space Data Link Protocol;
c) section 3 defines the services provided by the protocol entity;
d) section 4 specifies the protocol data units and procedures employed by the protocol
entity;
e) section 5 specifies the managed parameters used by the protocol entity;
f) section 6 specifies the protocol entity with support for the Space Data Link Security
protocol;
g) annex A lists all acronyms used within this document;
h) annex B provides a list of informative references.
1.6 CONVENTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
1.6.1 DEFINITIONS
1.6.1.1 Definitions from the Open Systems Interconnection (OSI) Basic Reference
Model
This Recommended Standard makes use of a number of terms defined in reference [1]. The
use of those terms in this Recommended Standard is to be understood in a generic sense, i.e.,
in the sense that those terms are generally applicable to any of a variety of technologies that
provide for the exchange of information between real systems. Those terms are:
a) blocking;
b) connection;
c) Data Link Layer;
d) entity;
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-2 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
e) flow control;
f) Network Layer;
g) peer entities;
h) Physical Layer;
i) protocol control information;
j) protocol data unit;
k) real system;
l) segmenting;
m) service;
n) Service Access Point (SAP);
o) SAP address;
p) service data unit.
1.6.1.2 Definitions from OSI Service Definition Conventions
This Recommended Standard makes use of a number of terms defined in reference [2]. The
use of those terms in this Recommended Standard is to be understood in a generic sense, i.e.,
in the sense that those terms are generally applicable to any of a variety of technologies that
provide for the exchange of information between real systems. Those terms are:
a) confirmation;
b) indication;
c) primitive;
d) request;
e) response;
f) service provider;
g) service user.
1.6.1.3 Terms Defined in this Recommended Standard
For the purposes of this Recommended Standard, the following definitions also apply. Many
other terms that pertain to specific items are defined in the appropriate sections.
asynchronous: not synchronous (see below).
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-3 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
delimited: having a known (and finite) length; applies to data in the context of data
handling.
Mission Phase: a period of a mission during which specified communications characteristics
are fixed. The transition between two consecutive Mission Phases may cause an interruption
of the communications services.
Physical Channel: a stream of bits transferred over a space link in a single direction.
space link: a communications link between a spacecraft and its associated ground system, or
between two spacecraft. A space link consists of one or more Physical Channels in one or
both directions.
synchronous: of or pertaining to a sequence of events occurring in a fixed time relationship
(within specified tolerance) to another sequence of events.
(TC) Transfer Frame: The protocol data unit of the Telecommand (TC) Space Data Link
Protocol.
1.6.2 NOMENCLATURE
1.6.2.1 Normative Text
The following conventions apply for the normative specifications in this Recommended
Standard:
a) the words ‘shall’ and ‘must’ imply a binding and verifiable specification;
b) the word ‘should’ implies an optional, but desirable, specification;
c) the word ‘may’ implies an optional specification;
d) the words ‘is’, ‘are’, and ‘will’ imply statements of fact.
NOTE – These conventions do not imply constraints on diction in text that is clearly
informative in nature.
1.6.2.2 Informative Text
In the normative sections of this document, informative text is set off from the normative
specifications either in notes or under one of the following subsection headings:
– Overview;
– Background;
– Rationale;
– Discussion.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-4 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
1.6.3 CONVENTIONS
In this document, the following convention is used to identify each bit in an N-bit field. The
first bit in the field to be transmitted (i.e., the most left justified when drawing a figure) is
defined to be ‘Bit 0’; the following bit is defined to be ‘Bit 1’ and so on up to ‘Bit N-1’.
When the field is used to express a binary value (such as a counter), the Most Significant Bit
(MSB) shall be the first transmitted bit of the field, i.e., ‘Bit 0’ (see figure 1-1).
BIT N-1
BIT 0
N-BIT DATA FIELD
FIRST BIT TRANSMITTED = MSB
Figure 1-1: Bit Numbering Convention
In accordance with standard data-communications practice, data fields are often grouped into
eight-bit ‘words’ which conform to the above convention. Throughout this Recommended
Standard, such an eight-bit word is called an ‘octet’.
The numbering for octets within a data structure starts with zero.
By CCSDS convention, all ‘spare’ bits shall be permanently set to ‘0’.
1.7 REFERENCES
The following publications contain provisions which, through reference in this text,
constitute provisions of this document. At the time of publication, the editions indicated
were valid. All publications are subject to revision, and users of this document are
encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the
publications indicated below. The CCSDS Secretariat maintains a register of currently valid
CCSDS publications.
[1] Information Technology—Open Systems Interconnection—Basic Reference Model: The
Basic Model. 2nd ed. International Standard, ISO/IEC 7498-1:1994. Geneva: ISO,
1994.
[2] Information Technology—Open Systems Interconnection—Basic Reference Model—
Conventions for the Definition of OSI Services. International Standard, ISO/IEC
10731:1994. Geneva: ISO, 1994.
[3] TC Synchronization and Channel Coding. Issue 2. Recommendation for Space Data
System Standards (Blue Book), CCSDS 231.0-B-2. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS,
September 2010.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-5 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
[4] Communications Operation Procedure-1. Issue 2. Recommendation for Space Data
System Standards (Blue Book), CCSDS 232.1-B-2. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS,
September 2010.
[5] “Registries.” Space Assigned Number Authority. http://sanaregistry.org/r/.
[6] CCSDS Global Spacecraft Identification Field Code Assignment Control Procedures.
Issue 6. Recommendation for Space Data System Standards (Blue Book), CCSDS
320.0-B-6. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS, October 2013.
[7] Space Data Link Security Protocol. Issue 1. Recommendation for Space Data System
Standards (Blue Book), CCSDS 355.0-B-1. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS, September
2015.
NOTE – Informative references are listed in annex B.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 1-6 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
2 OVERVIEW
2.1 CONCEPT OF TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
2.1.1 ARCHITECTURE
The TC Space Data Link Protocol is a Data Link Layer protocol (see reference [1]) to be used
by space missions. This protocol has been designed to meet the requirements of space
missions for efficient transfer of space application data of various types and characteristics
over ground-to-space or space-to-space communications links (hereafter called space links).
Figure 2-1 illustrates the relationship of this protocol to the Open Systems Interconnection
(OSI) reference model (reference [1]). Two sublayers of the Data Link Layer are defined for
CCSDS space link protocols as shown in reference [B2]. The TC Space Data Link Protocol
corresponds to the Logical Link Sublayer and provides functions of transferring various data
using a variable-length protocol data unit called the Transfer Frame. The optional Space Data
Link Layer Security Protocol (reference [7]) is provided within the Data Link Protocol
Sublayer, as illustrated below. The Channel Coding Sublayer provides some additional
functions necessary for transferring Transfer Frames over a space link. These functions are
error-correction coding/decoding, the delimiting/synchronizing of codeblocks (consisting of one
or more Transfer Frames), and bit transition generation/removal (optional). For the Channel
Coding Sublayer, the Channel Coding and Synchronization Recommended Standard (reference
[3]) must be used with the TC Space Data Link Protocol. How the TC Space Data Link
Protocol is used in overall space data systems is shown in references [B2], [B3], and [B4].
OSI LAYERS CCSDS LAYERS
CCSDS
PROTOCOLS
NETWORK AND NETWORK AND
UPPER LAYERS UPPER LAYERS
TC SPACE DATA LINK
DATA LINK
PROTOCOL
PROTOCOL
&
SUBLAYER
SPACE DATA LINK
SECURITY PROTOCOL
DATA LINK LAYER
SYNCHRONIZATION TC SYNCHRONIZATION
AND CHANNEL AND
CODING SUBLAYER CHANNEL CODING
PHYSICAL LAYER PHYSICAL LAYER
Figure 2-1: Relationship with OSI Layers
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 2-1 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
2.1.2 PROTOCOL FEATURES
2.1.2.1 Efficient Data Transfer
The TC Space Data Link Protocol provides the users with several services to transfer service
data units over a space link. The major functions performed by this protocol are (1)
segmentation and blocking of service data units and (2) transmission control of service data
units.
Because the underlying space link inherently includes a noisy signal path, there is a finite
probability that it will introduce an error. It is desirable to break large service data units into
relatively small pieces so that each piece has a lower probability of being invalidated by
transmission error than if the entire service data unit were sent contiguously. System
throughput efficiency is improved because only small pieces have to be retransmitted when
errors are detected. However, there may also be situations in which the service data units are
very small. For efficient transfer of service data units, it is desirable to group these small
units into larger pieces. The TC Space Data Link Protocol provides the capability to break
large service data units into relatively small pieces (segmentation) and to group small service
data units into larger pieces (blocking).
The TC Space Data Link Protocol controls the transmission of service data units through the
space link performing retransmissions needed to ensure delivery of service data units in
sequence and without gaps or duplication. This function is provided by an automatic
retransmission control mechanism called the Communications Operation Procedure (COP).
The specification of the COP is given in reference [4]. In addition, a systematic
retransmission mechanism for use on deep space links can optionally be provided by the
Synchronization and Channel Coding Sublayer as specified in reference [3].
2.1.2.2 Sharing the Physical Channel
The protocol data units employed by this protocol are the TC Transfer Frame (unless
otherwise stated, the terms ‘Transfer Frame’ and ‘Frame’ in this document refer to the TC
Transfer Frame) and the Communications Link Control Word (CLCW). Each Transfer
Frame contains a header, which provides protocol control information, and a variable-length
data field, within which higher-layer service data units are carried. Transfer Frames are sent
in the direction of the flow of service data units. Each CLCW contains a report that describes
the status of acceptance of Transfer Frames. CLCWs are sent from the receiver to the sender
of Transfer Frames.
A key feature of the TC Space Data Link Protocol is the concept of ‘Virtual Channels’. The
Virtual Channel facility allows one Physical Channel to be shared among multiple higher-
layer data streams, each of which may have different service requirements. A single Physical
Channel may therefore be divided into several separate logical data channels, each known as
a ‘Virtual Channel’ (VC). Each Transfer Frame transferred over a Physical Channel belongs
to one of the Virtual Channels of the Physical Channel.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 2-2 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
Optionally, this protocol enables service data units from different sources to be multiplexed
together in one Virtual Channel using ‘Multiplexer Access Points’ (MAPs). If MAPs are
used, service data units arriving at the service access point for a MAP at the sending end are
transferred to the corresponding MAP at the receiving end.
2.1.2.3 Optional Space Data Link Security Protocol
The Data Link Protocol Sublayer includes the Space Data Link Security (SDLS) protocol
specified in reference [7]. The SDLS protocol can provide security, such as authentication
and confidentiality, for TC Transfer Frames. Support for the SDLS protocol is an optional
feature of the TC Space Data Link Protocol.
NOTE – The introduction of the SDLS protocol in this Recommended Standard makes no
changes to any requirements that apply to a TC Space Data Link Protocol that
does not support the SDLS protocol.
The security provided by the SDLS protocol can vary between Virtual Channels and between
MAPs within a Virtual Channel. So, for example, there can be some Virtual Channels with
security and some without. The type of security can vary from one Virtual Channel to another
and from one MAP to another.
2.1.3 ADDRESSING
There are three identifier fields in the header of Transfer Frames: Transfer Frame Version
Number (TFVN), Spacecraft Identifier (SCID), and Virtual Channel Identifier (VCID). The
concatenation of a TFVN and a SCID is known as a Master Channel Identifier (MCID), and
the concatenation of an MCID and a VCID is called a Global Virtual Channel Identifier
(GVCID). Therefore
MCID = TFVN + SCID;
GVCID = MCID + VCID
= TFVN + SCID + VCID.
Each Virtual Channel on a Physical Channel is identified by a GVCID. Therefore a Virtual
Channel consists of Transfer Frames having the same GVCID.
All Transfer Frames with the same MCID on a Physical Channel constitute a Master Channel
(MC). A Master Channel consists of one or more Virtual Channels. In most cases, a
Physical Channel carries only Transfer Frames of a single MCID, and the Master Channel
will be identical with the Physical Channel. However, a Physical Channel may carry Transfer
Frames with multiple MCIDs (with the same TFVN). In such a case, the Physical Channel
consists of multiple Master Channels. A Physical Channel is identified with a Physical
Channel Name, which is set by management and not included in the header of Transfer
Frames.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 2-3 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
In the optional Segment Header, there is a field called Multiplexer Access Point Identifier
(MAP ID). All Transfer Frames with the same GVCID and MAP ID constitute a MAP
Channel. If the Segment Header is used, a Virtual Channel consists of one or multiple MAP
Channels. The concatenation of a GVCID and a MAP ID is known as a Global MAP ID
(GMAP ID). Therefore
GMAP ID = GVCID + MAP ID
= MCID + VCID + MAP ID
= TFVN + SCID + VCID + MAP ID.
The relationships between these Channels are shown in figure 2-2.
MAP Channel (Optional):
Identified by GMAP ID
Virtual Channel:
Identified by GVCID
Master Channel:
Identified by MCID
Physical Channel:
Identified by Physical
Channel Name
Figure 2-2: Relationships Between Channels
2.1.4 PROTOCOL DESCRIPTION
The TC Space Data Link Protocol is described in terms of:
a) the services provided to the users;
b) the protocol data units; and
c) the procedures performed by the protocol.
The service definitions are given in the form of primitives, which present an abstract model of
the logical exchange of data and control information between the protocol entity and the service
user. The definitions of primitives are independent of specific implementation approaches.
The procedure specifications define the procedures performed by protocol entities for the
transfer of information between peer entities. The definitions of procedures are independent
of specific implementation methods or technologies.
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 2-4 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
This protocol specification also specifies the requirements for the underlying services
provided by the Channel Coding Sublayer and the Physical Layer.
2.2 OVERVIEW OF SERVICES
2.2.1 COMMON FEATURES OF SERVICES
The TC Space Data Link Protocol provides users with data transfer services. The point at
which a service is provided by a protocol entity to a user is called a Service Access Point
(SAP) (see reference [1]). Each service user is identified by a SAP address. At a SAP, two
ports may be provided, each of which is for one of the service types described in 2.2.2.
Service data units of the same type submitted to a SAP (or a port if implemented) are
processed in the order of submission. No processing order is maintained for service data
units submitted to different SAPs (or ports).
NOTE – Implementations may be required to perform flow control at a SAP (or a port if
present) between the service user and the service provider. However, CCSDS
does not make any recommendations for a scheme for flow control between the
user and the provider.
The followings features are common to all the services defined by this Recommended
Standard:
a) Unidirectional (one way) services: one end of a connection can send, but not receive,
data through the space link, while the other end can receive, but not send.
b) Asynchronous services: there are no predefined timing rules for the transfer of
service data units supplied by the service user or for the transmission of Transfer
Frames generated by the service provider. The user may request data transfer at any
time, but there may be restrictions imposed by the service provider on the data
generation rate. The timing of data transfer is determined by the provider in
accordance with mission-specific rules and may depend on the traffic at the time of
transfer.
c) Sequence preserving services: the sequence of service data units supplied by the
sending user is preserved through the transfer over the space link, although for the
Expedited Service, described below, there may be gaps in the sequence of service data
units delivered to the receiving user.
NOTE – This Recommended Standard assumes that these services are provided at the end
points of a space link. However, this Recommended Standard makes no
assumptions concerning how these end points are composed or configured either
on-board a spacecraft or in a ground system. In a ground system, the services
defined by this Recommended Standard may be extended or enhanced with Space
Link Extension Services (reference [B5]).
CCSDS 232.0-B-3 Page 2-5 September 2015
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR TC SPACE DATA LINK PROTOCOL
2.2.2 SERVICE TYPES
2.2.2.1 Overview
The TC Space Data Link Protocol provides two service types (Sequence-Controlled and
Expedited) that determine how reliably service data units supplied by the sending user are
delivered to the receiving user.
Both of these two service types are provided at any Service Access Point except for the
Virtual Channel Frame, Master Channel Frame, and COP Mana
...