ISO 18423:2015

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 18423
Second edition
2015-08-15
Space data and information transfer
systems — Pseudo-Noise (PN)
Ranging Systems
Systèmes de transfert des informations et données spatiales —
Systèmes de mesure du pseudo-bruit
Reference number
©
ISO 2015
© ISO 2015, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2015 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 18423 was prepared by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) (as
CCSDS 414.1-B-2, February 2014) and was adopted (without modifications except those stated in clause 2 of
this International Standard) by Technical Committee ISO/TC 20, Aircraft and space vehicles, Subcommittee
SC 13, Space data and information transfer systems.

Recommendation for Space Data System Standards
PSEUDO-NOISE (PN)
RANGING SYSTEMS
RECOMMENDED STANDARD
CCSDS 414.1-B-2
BLUE BOOK
February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
AUTHORITY
Issue: Recommended Standard, Issue 2
Date: February 2014
Location: Washington, DC, USA
This document has been approved for publication by the Management Council of the
Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) and represents the consensus
technical agreement of the participating CCSDS Member Agencies. The procedure for
review and authorization of CCSDS documents is detailed in Organization and Processes for
the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS A02.1-Y-3), and the record of
Agency participation in the authorization of this document can be obtained from the CCSDS
Secretariat at the address below.

This document is published and maintained by:

CCSDS Secretariat
Space Communications and Navigation Office, 7L70
Space Operations Mission Directorate
NASA Headquarters
Washington, DC 20546-0001, USA
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page i February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
STATEMENT OF INTENT
The Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems (CCSDS) is an organization officially
established by the management of its members. The Committee meets periodically to address
data systems problems that are common to all participants, and to formulate sound technical
solutions to these problems. Inasmuch as participation in the CCSDS is completely
voluntary, the results of Committee actions are termed Recommended Standards and are
not considered binding on any Agency.
This Recommended Standard is issued by, and represents the consensus of, the CCSDS
members. Endorsement of this Recommendation is entirely voluntary. Endorsement,
however, indicates the following understandings:
o Whenever a member establishes a CCSDS-related standard, this standard will be in
accord with the relevant Recommended Standard. Establishing such a standard
does not preclude other provisions which a member may develop.
o Whenever a member establishes a CCSDS-related standard, that member will
provide other CCSDS members with the following information:
-- The standard itself.
-- The anticipated date of initial operational capability.
-- The anticipated duration of operational service.
o Specific service arrangements shall be made via memoranda of agreement. Neither
this Recommended Standard nor any ensuing standard is a substitute for a
memorandum of agreement.
No later than three years from its date of issuance, this Recommended Standard will be
reviewed by the CCSDS to determine whether it should: (1) remain in effect without change;
(2) be changed to reflect the impact of new technologies, new requirements, or new
directions; or (3) be retired or canceled.
In those instances when a new version of a Recommended Standard is issued, existing
CCSDS-related member standards and implementations are not negated or deemed to be
non-CCSDS compatible. It is the responsibility of each member to determine when such
standards or implementations are to be modified. Each member is, however, strongly
encouraged to direct planning for its new standards and implementations towards the later
version of the Recommended Standard.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page ii February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
FOREWORD
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the
subject of patent rights. CCSDS shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such
patent rights.
Through the process of normal evolution, it is expected that expansion, deletion, or
modification of this document may occur. This Recommended Standard is therefore subject
to CCSDS document management and change control procedures, which are defined in
Organization and Processes for the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems
(CCSDS A02.1-Y-3). Current versions of CCSDS documents are maintained at the CCSDS
Web site:
http://www.ccsds.org/
Questions relating to the contents or status of this document should be addressed to the
CCSDS Secretariat at the address indicated on page i.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page iii February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
At time of publication, the active Member and Observer Agencies of the CCSDS were:
Member Agencies
– Agenzia Spaziale Italiana (ASI)/Italy.
– Canadian Space Agency (CSA)/Canada.
– Centre National d’Etudes Spatiales (CNES)/France.
– China National Space Administration (CNSA)/People’s Republic of China.
– Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt (DLR)/Germany.
– European Space Agency (ESA)/Europe.
– Federal Space Agency (FSA)/Russian Federation.
– Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)/Brazil.
– Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA)/Japan.
– National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)/USA.
– UK Space Agency/United Kingdom.
Observer Agencies
– Austrian Space Agency (ASA)/Austria.
– Belgian Federal Science Policy Office (BFSPO)/Belgium.
– Central Research Institute of Machine Building (TsNIIMash)/Russian Federation.
– China Satellite Launch and Tracking Control General, Beijing Institute of Tracking
and Telecommunications Technology (CLTC/BITTT)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS)/China.
– Chinese Academy of Space Technology (CAST)/China.
– Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)/Australia.
– Danish National Space Center (DNSC)/Denmark.
– Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia Aeroespacial (DCTA)/Brazil.
– European Organization for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites
(EUMETSAT)/Europe.
– European Telecommunications Satellite Organization (EUTELSAT)/Europe.
– Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA)/Thailand.
– Hellenic National Space Committee (HNSC)/Greece.
– Indian Space Research Organization (ISRO)/India.
– Institute of Space Research (IKI)/Russian Federation.
– KFKI Research Institute for Particle & Nuclear Physics (KFKI)/Hungary.
– Korea Aerospace Research Institute (KARI)/Korea.
– Ministry of Communications (MOC)/Israel.
– National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (NICT)/Japan.
– National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)/USA.
– National Space Agency of the Republic of Kazakhstan (NSARK)/Kazakhstan.
– National Space Organization (NSPO)/Chinese Taipei.
– Naval Center for Space Technology (NCST)/USA.
– Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK)/Turkey.
– South African National Space Agency (SANSA)/Republic of South Africa.
– Space and Upper Atmosphere Research Commission (SUPARCO)/Pakistan.
– Swedish Space Corporation (SSC)/Sweden.
– Swiss Space Office (SSO)/Switzerland.
– United States Geological Survey (USGS)/USA.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page iv February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
DOCUMENT CONTROL
Document Title Date Status
CCSDS Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging March 2009 Original issue,
414.1-B-1 Systems, Recommended Standard, superseded
Issue 1
CCSDS Pseudo-Noise (PN) Ranging February Current issue
414.1-B-2 Systems, Recommended Standard, 2014
Issue 2
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page v February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
CONTENTS
Section Page
1 INTRODUCTION . 1-1

1.1 PURPOSE . 1-1
1.2 SCOPE . 1-1
1.3 APPLICABILITY . 1-1
1.4 RATIONALE . 1-1
1.5 CONVENTIONS AND DEFINITIONS. 1-2
1.6 REFERENCES . 1-3

2 OVERVIEW . 2-1

3 REGENERATIVE PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING . 3-1

3.1 OVERVIEW . 3-1
3.2 PN CODE STRUCTURE . 3-1
3.3 GROUND STATION UPLINK PROCESSING . 3-2
3.4 ON-BOARD PROCESSING . 3-4
3.5 GROUND STATION DOWNLINK PROCESSING . 3-8

4 TRANSPARENT PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING . 4-1

4.1 OVERVIEW . 4-1
4.2 PN CODE STRUCTURE . 4-1
4.3 GROUND STATION UPLINK PROCESSING . 4-1
4.4 ON-BOARD TRANSPARENT PROCESSING . 4-3
4.5 GROUND STATION DOWNLINK PROCESSING . 4-4

5 SECURITY . 5-1

5.1 INTRODUCTION . 5-1
5.2 SECURITY CONCERNS WITH RESPECT TO THE CCSDS DOCUMENT . 5-1
5.3 POTENTIAL THREATS AND ATTACK SCENARIOS . 5-1
5.4 CONSEQUENCES OF NOT APPLYING SECURITY TO
THE TECHNOLOGY . 5-2

ANNEX A SPECIFICATIONS FOR PN RANGING (NORMATIVE) . A-1
ANNEX B EXAMPLE OF AVAILABLE CHIP RATES (INFORMATIVE) .B-1
ANNEX C INFORMATIVE REFERENCES (INFORMATIVE) . C-1
ANNEX D ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (INFORMATIVE) . D-1
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page vi February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
CONTENTS (continued)
Figure Page
3-1 Regenerative T4B PN Code Generation . 3-1
3-2 Regenerative T2B PN Code Generation . 3-2
4-1 Transparent T2B PN Code Generation . 4-1

Table
3-1 Uplink Chip Rates . 3-4
3-2 Theoretical Ranging Code Phase Acquisition Time for the On-Board Receiver . 3-6
3-3 Theoretical (One-Way) Ranging Jitter for the On-Board Receiver . 3-7
3-4 Theoretical Ranging Code Phase Acquisition Time for the Station Receiver. 3-9
3-5 Theoretical (One-Way) Ranging Jitter for the Station Receiver . 3-10
4-1 Theoretical Ranging Code Phase Acquisition Time for the Station
Receiver (Transparent Ranging) . 4-5
4-2 Theoretical (One-Way) Ranging Jitter for the Station
Receiver (Transparent Ranging) . 4-6
A-1 Key Specifications for On-Board PN Regenerative Ranging . A-1
A-2 Key Specifications for PN Ranging and On-Board Transparent Channel . A-2
B-1 Example of Available Chip Rates .B-1

CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page vii February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this document is to provide a Recommendation for Space Data System
Standards in the area of transparent and regenerative Pseudo-Noise (PN) ranging systems.
The PN ranging system is used to measure the round-trip light time between a ground station
and a spacecraft. Regenerative ranging is primarily relevant for low Signal-to-Noise Ratio
(SNR) cases like those seen in deep space missions; transparent ranging is more suitable for
high SNR cases or when high accuracy ranging is not required.
1.2 SCOPE
This Recommended Standard defines both transparent and regenerative PN ranging systems
for non–data relay satellite users. The specification for PN code components and generation,
on-board spacecraft regenerative/transparent processing, ground station processing, and
uplink and downlink signal modulation are defined in this document. This Recommended
Standard does not specify a) individual implementations or products, b) implementation of
service interfaces within real systems, or c) the management activities required to configure
and control the protocol.
1.3 APPLICABILITY
The Recommended Standard specified in this document is to be invoked through the normal
standards programs of each CCSDS Agency and is applicable to those missions for which
cross support based on capabilities described in this Recommended Standard is anticipated.
Where mandatory capabilities are clearly indicated in sections of the Recommended
Standard, they must be implemented when this document is used as a basis for cross support.
Where options are allowed or implied, implementation of these options is subject to specific
bilateral cross support agreements between the Agencies involved.
1.4 RATIONALE
The CCSDS believes it is important to document the rationale underlying the
recommendations chosen, so that future evaluations of proposed changes or improvements
will not lose sight of previous decisions. Concept and rationale behind the decisions that
formed the basis for this Recommended Standard are found in the CCSDS Pseudo-Noise
Ranging Systems Green Book (reference [C1]).

The term ‘transparent ranging’ is used in this standard to mean non-regenerative ranging or turn-around
ranging.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 1-1 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
1.5 CONVENTIONS AND DEFINITIONS
1.5.1 DEFINITIONS
The following definitions apply throughout this Recommended Standard:
chip rate: rate at which the PN code bits (or ‘chips’) are transmitted.
coherent transponder: transponder for which the downlink carrier is phase-coherent with
the received uplink carrier.
component sequences: family of shorter-length PN sequences used to form the ranging PN
code using logic operations.
range clock: PN component code with the highest frequency (i.e., shortest period);
determines the range resolution.
regenerative ranging: type of ranging where the spacecraft demodulates and acquires the
ranging code by correlation with a local code replica from the uplink ranging signal,
and regenerates the ranging code on the downlink.
transparent ranging: type of ranging where the spacecraft frequency-translates the uplink
ranging signal to the downlink without code acquisition (i.e., non-regenerative
ranging or turn-around ranging).
one-way jitter: ranging jitter in meters resulting from measuring the round-trip light time
and halving the measurement to compute the distance.
1.5.2 NOMENCLATURE
The following conventions apply through this Recommended Standard:
– the words ‘shall’ and ‘must’ imply a binding and verifiable specification;
– the word ‘should’ implies an optional, but desirable, specification;
– the word ‘may’ implies an optional specification;
– the words ‘is’, ‘are’, and ‘will’ imply statements of fact.
1.5.3 CONVENTIONS
In this document, the following convention is used:
– A ‘+1’ ranging chip corresponds to a binary 0 value;
– A ‘−1’ ranging chip corresponds to a binary 1 value.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 1-2 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
1.6 REFERENCES
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute
provisions of this Recommended Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated
were valid. All documents are subject to revision, and users of this Recommended Standard
are encouraged to investigate the possibility of applying the most recent editions of the
documents indicated below. The CCSDS Secretariat maintains a register of currently valid
CCSDS Recommended Standards.
[1] Radio Frequency and Modulation Systems—Part 1: Earth Stations and Spacecraft.
Issue 23. Recommendation for Space Data System Standards (Blue Book), CCSDS
401.0-B-23. Washington, D.C.: CCSDS, December 2013.
NOTE – Informative references are provided in annex C.

CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 1-3 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
2 OVERVIEW
Several upcoming missions require higher accuracy spacecraft position determination
compared to currently supported missions. One solution to cope with these new
requirements is the use of regenerative PN ranging systems. Regenerative ranging presents
several advantages with respect to the classical non-regenerative ranging, which is the
approach at present used by CCSDS Agencies supporting deep space missions. The
regenerative ranging technique requires the use of PN codes with important impacts for on-
board transponder and Earth station design, differing from non-regenerative systems for
which transparent transponders are commonly used.
Even though the advantages of regenerative ranging are mainly relevant to the low SNR case
(e.g., deep space missions), the use of PN ranging with transparent on-board processing is
also possible. This solution is attractive in presence of good link margin or when very
accurate ranging is not needed with performance similar to non-PN ranging systems. A
transponder based on a transparent ranging channel will have reduced complexity compared
with the regenerative case. The spacecraft demodulates a large frequency range around the
carrier and re-modulates the entire bandpass including the uplink noise onto the downlink
carrier. With a transparent system, the ranging SNR at the station is proportional to 1/r
where r is the distance to be measured. In a regenerative PN ranging system, a PN ranging
code is phase modulated on the uplink carrier and transmitted from the ground station to the
spacecraft. This ranging signal is derived using a logical combination of a ranging clock and
several component PN codes. Received by the spacecraft, the ranging signal is demodulated
by the spacecraft transponder, and the ranging code is acquired. The spacecraft then
regenerates the ranging code coherently with the uplink code and phase modulates the
downlink carrier with the locally generated version of the ranging code. Back at the ground
station, the station receiver demodulates the downlink and correlates the received ranging
signal with a local model of the range clock and component PN codes to determine the
round-trip light time. The ranging SNR at the station is therefore proportional to 1/r where r
is the distance to be measured.
Selection of the ranging clock frequency determines the range precision. Likewise, the
component codes structure and combination logic affect the code acquisition time and
probability, range ambiguity, and range precision. The PN codes in this Recommended
Standard have been selected to provide high ranging accuracy while maintaining a
reasonable code acquisition time.
For transparent PN ranging, the uplink process is exactly the same as in the regenerative
ranging case. However, in transparent PN ranging the spacecraft does not attempt to acquire
the ranging code; instead, it phase modulates the uplink ranging signal as received on board
onto the downlink without further processing. The ground station receiver demodulates the
downlink and performs the PN ranging correlation in the same manner as for regenerative
ranging. Because any uplink noise is re-modulated onto the downlink, transparent ranging
accuracy will generally not be as good as with regenerative ranging; however, transparent
ranging requires less complexity in the spacecraft transponder.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 2-1 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
This Recommended Standard is divided into two main parts covering regenerative PN
ranging and transparent PN ranging. This Recommended Standard contains sections on the
selection of PN code structure and modulation scheme, ground station uplink processing, on-
board spacecraft processing, and ground station downlink processing.

CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 2-2 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
3 REGENERATIVE PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING
3.1 OVERVIEW
This section provides recommendations for regenerative PN ranging. Specifically,
recommendations are made for the PN code structure and modulation scheme, ground station
transmit (uplink) processing, on-board regenerative processing, and ground station receive
(downlink) processing.
3.2 PN CODE STRUCTURE
3.2.1 OVERVIEW
This subsection defines the PN ranging code components and combination logic for
generating the regenerative PN ranging codes.
3.2.2 WEIGHTED-VOTING BALANCED TAUSWORTHE, ν=4
For range measurements where the ranging accuracy is of primary concern, the PN ranging
code called Weighted-voting balanced Tausworthe, ν=4 (T4B) shall be selected.
The code is made up of six binary (±1) periodic ‘component sequences’ with a combination
algorithm based on giving ν=4 votes to the clock component C1 as shown in figure 3-1.
The resulting ranging sequence C is periodic with length L = 2 × 7 × 11 × 15 × 19 × 23 =
1,009,470 chips.
+1 –1 C1
C2
+1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 –1
C3
+1 +1 +1 –1 –1 –1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1
C4
+1 +1 +1 +1 –1 –1 –1 +1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1
C5
+1 +1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1 +1 –1 –1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1
C6
+1 +1 +1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 –1 +1 –1 –1 –1 –1

where the combined sequence is C = sign(4C1+ C2 − C3 − C4 + C5 − C6)
Figure 3-1: Regenerative T4B PN Code Generation
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 3-1 February 2014
Combining Logic
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
3.2.3 WEIGHTED-VOTING BALANCED TAUSWORTHE, ν=2
For range measurements where the acquisition time is of primary concern, such as for
missions where the ranging signal will be very weak, the PN ranging code called Weighted-
voting balanced Tausworthe, ν=2 (T2B) shall be selected.
The Weighted-voting (ν=2) Tausworthe ranging code is made up of the same six binary (±1)
periodic ‘component sequences’ as the T4B code, but with a different combination algorithm
based on giving ν=2 votes to the clock component C1 as shown in figure 3-2.
The resulting ranging sequence C is periodic with length L = 2 × 7 × 11 × 15 × 19 × 23 =
1,009,470 chips.
C1
+1 –1
C2
+1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 –1
C3
+1 +1 +1 –1 –1 –1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1
C4
+1 +1 +1 +1 –1 –1 –1 +1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1
C5
+1 +1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1 +1 –1 –1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1
C6
+1 +1 +1 +1 +1 –1 +1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 +1 –1 –1 +1 –1 +1 –1 –1 –1 –1

where the combined sequence is C = sign(2C1+ C2 − C3 − C4 + C5 − C6)
Figure 3-2: Regenerative T2B PN Code Generation
3.3 GROUND STATION UPLINK PROCESSING
3.3.1 OVERVIEW
This subsection provides recommendations for ground station uplink (transmit) processing
for PN ranging.
3.3.2 UPLINK MODULATION
3.3.2.1 Modulating Signal
The ground station transmitter shall modulate the uplink carrier with the PN code specified in 3.2.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 3-2 February 2014
Combining Logic
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
3.3.2.2 Modulation Scheme
The ranging signal shall be linearly phase modulated on the uplink carrier; i.e., a positive
transition of −1 to +1 in the base-band code shall result in an advance of the transmitted RF
carrier phase.
3.3.2.3 Base-Band Shaping
Base-band shaping should be used on the PN ranging signal to conserve bandwidth at high
chip rates and high modulation indexes.
3.3.2.4 Base-Band Shaping Filter Impulse Response
The shaping filter shall have the following impulse response:
sin(πtT/ ) t ∈[0,T ]
⎧
cc
ht()==h ()t
⎨
sin
0 elsewhere
⎩
where T is the chip duration.
c
3.3.2.5 Ranging and Telecommand
Ranging according to this standard and telecommand as specified in CCSDS 401.0-B 2.2.4
and 2.2.7 (reference [1]) may be performed at the same time.
3.3.3 UPLINK CHIP RATE
The ranging signal chip rate shall be frequency coherent with the uplink carrier as given by
the following expression (for k=6 and l={1,2,…,12,16,32, or 64} or for l=2 and k={8,9, or
10}). See also an example of available chip rates in annex B.

Reference [C1] may be consulted for the analysis of occupied bandwidth versus modulation index.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 3-3 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
Table 3-1: Uplink Chip Rates
f
S−band
F = 2F = l ⋅  for S-band uplinks
chip clock
k
128 ⋅ 2
221 f
⎛ ⎞
X −band
F = 2F = l ⋅ ⋅ for X-band uplinks
⎜ ⎟
chip clock
k
749 128⋅2
⎝ ⎠
221 f
⎛ ⎞ 3
−
Ka band
F = 2F = l ⋅ ⋅ for Ka-band uplinks
⎜ ⎟
chip clock
k
3599 128⋅2
⎝ ⎠
where
F is the chip rate in Mchip/s
chip
F is the ranging clock in MHz
clock
f , f , f are the S-band, X-band, and Ka-band uplink frequencies,
S-band X-band Ka-band
respectively, in MHz
For interoperability reasons, the Earth stations shall as a minimum support two chip rate
values: the preferred value of approximately two Mchip/s obtained by selecting l=8 and k=6
in the equations of table 3-1 and a lower value of approximately one Mchip/s obtained by
selecting l=4 and k=6 in the equations of table 3-1.
The configuration of some CCSDS Agencies’ ground stations may not be able to easily
implement the above ratios between chip rate and carrier frequency. In such cases, the offset
expressed in Hz between the generated value and the theoretical value shall be < 10 mHz for
all the chip rates in table 3-1. However, the chip rate shall remain locked to the station
frequency reference.
3.4 ON-BOARD PROCESSING
3.4.1 OVERVIEW
This subsection defines the on-board spacecraft functions and performances for regenerative
ranging. Subsections 3.4.2, 3.4.6.1, 3.4.6.2, 3.4.6.3, 3.4.6.4 and 3.4.6.6 are required for cross
support while subsections 3.4.3, 3.4.4, 3.4.5 and 3.4.6.5 are based on good engineering
practice and could be relaxed depending on the specific mission requirements.
3.4.2 PROCESSING FUNCTIONS
The on-board transponder shall implement the following ranging functions:
– carrier tracking and ranging signal demodulation;
– chip rate acquisition and tracking;

34200–34700 MHz.
CCSDS 414.1-B-2 Page 3-4 February 2014
CCSDS RECOMMENDED STANDARD FOR PSEUDO-NOISE RANGING SYSTEMS
– code acquisition and tracking;
– coherent retransmission of regenerated code on the downlink signal.
As far as the processing of the ranging signal is concerned, either a frequency coherent or
non-coherent transponder can be used. The performance specification in this standard
assumes a frequency coherent transponder.
These requirements shall apply to all operational modes like telecommand on/off and
telemetry on/off.
3.4.3 RANGING SIGNAL ACQUISITION PERFORMANCES
3.4.3.1 General
The on-board receiver shall be able to acquire the PN code for the whole dynamic range of
input signal power (down to the minimum ranging power over noise spectral density, P /N ),
r o
fr
...