Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection

SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for protection of a building or site.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 2 through 7, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2 through 7) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Oct-1999
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E1665-95a(1999) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection
English language
14 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
An American National Standard
Designation: E 1665 – 95a (Reapproved 1999)
Standard Classification for
1,2
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Facility Protection
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1665; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classify- 2.1 ASTM Standards:
ing an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, E 631 Terminology of Building Constructions
the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible E 1334 Practice for Rating Serviceability of a Building or
requirements for protection of a building or site. Building-Related Facility
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, E 1679 Practice for Setting Requirements for Serviceability
shown in Figs. 2-7, are for classifying one topic of serviceabil- of a Building or Building-Related Facility
ity. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see 2.2 ISO Document:
Figs. 2-7) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Building—Contents and Presentation
Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7) is a translation of the
3. Terminology
requirement into a description of certain features of a facility
3.1 Definitions:
which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely
to meet that level of required serviceability. 3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
purpose.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 2-7)
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick 3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
scanningtoestimateapproximately,quickly,andeconomically,
how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use (see
another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not
for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is Terminology E 631).
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
performing.
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to required to be used.
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical, hydrother-
and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility mal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative importance of
each performance requirement (see Terminology E 631).
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a 3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
which business, clerical or professional activities are con-
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to ducted. (see Terminology E 631).
3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable
and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.
to this classification, see Terminology E 631.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 easement—a right held by one person in the land of
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E-6 on
another, such as the right to cross one parcel of land to get to
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
another parcel of land; or to use the land, as for installation and
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
maintenance of public utilities. (See Fig. 1.)
Current edition approved April 15, 1995. Published July 1995. Originally
published as E 1665 – 95. Last previous edition E 1665 – 95.
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and r 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.11.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Available from American National Standards Institute, 11 W. 42nd St., 13th
this standard is acknowledged. Floor, New York, NY 10036.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
E 1665
3.2.2 security functions: 4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well
3.2.2.1 detection—devices and methods such as guards, different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement
for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as
alarms and access control, and monitoring systems designed to
indicate, and possibly verify, attempted or actual unauthorized location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building
shape.
access.
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of
3.2.2.2 protection—physical and psychological barriers that
variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for
will delay or deter someone attempting unauthorized access.
a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
3.2.2.3 response—reactions to attempted or actual unautho-
4.4 Thisclassificationcanbeusedtoestimatethefollowing:
rized access, such as involvement of guard or police forces,
4.4.1 Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other
damage assessments, and rem
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.