Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and Technologies

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Each Facility Rating Scale in this classification provides a means for estimating the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and for comparing that level against the level of any other building or facility.
This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
This classification can be used to estimate the following: (1) serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use; (2) the serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built; and (3) the serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodelling has been planned.
The use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for special facilities and technologies.
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in printed side-by-side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see ) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (See ) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (See ) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in this classification are complementary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2005
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E1694-95a(2005) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and Technologies
English language
8 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
An American National Standard
Designation: E1694 – 95a (Reapproved 2005)
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and
,
1 2
Technologies
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1694; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying
an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
capability of an office facility to meet certain possible require- E1334 Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building
ments for special facilities and technologies. or Building-Related Facility
1.2 Each pair of scales shown in Figs. 1-6 printed side-by- E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Ser-
side on a page, are for classifying one topic of serviceability viceability of a Building or Building-Related Facility
within that aspect of serviceability. Each paragraph in an 2.2 ISO Documents:
Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-6) summarizes one ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
level of serviceability on that topic that occupants might Building—Contents and Presentation
require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (See ISO/DIS 7162 Draft International Standard, Performance
Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the requirement into a description Standards in Building—Contents and Format of Standards
of certain features of a facility that, taken in combination, for Evaluation of Performance
indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required ISO/DIS 7164 Draft International Standard, Performance
serviceability. Standards in Building—Definitions and Means of Expres-
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (See Figs. 1-6) sion for the Performance of a Whole Building
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
3. Terminology
scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economi-
3.1 Definitions—For standard definitions of terms appli-
cally, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of
one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries cable to this classification, see Terminology E631.
3.1.1 facility, n—a physical setting used to serve a specific
are not for measuring, knowing, and evaluating how an office
purpose. (E631)
facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of 3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, or
a whole building, or a building with its sites and surrounding
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
and outline specifications have been prepared. 3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but it does not required to be used. (E631)
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign
a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice facility as a system, including its subsystems, components, and
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical, hydrother-
E1334. The scales in this classification are complementary to
and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other. mal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative importance of
each performance requirement.
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
which business, clerical, or professional activities are con-
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
ducted. (E631)
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
Current edition approved May 1, 2005. Published May 2005. Originally
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 1999 as E1694 – 95a (1999). For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
DOI: 10.1520/E1694-95AR05. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
International Cen
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.