SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
01-december-2003
7HUPLQDOVNDRSUHPD7(±3UHVNXãDQMHVNODGQRVWLSUHQRVDGDWRWHNSUHN
GLJLWDOQHJDRPUHåMD]LQWHJULUDQLPLVWRULWYDPL,6'1±GHO3URILOVNRVSHFLILþQD
VSHFLILNDFLMDSUHVNXãDQMD3676]DSURILO)7$0(76
Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated
Services Digital Network (ISDN); Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the
FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: I-ETS 300 489-2 Edition 1
ICS:
33.080 Digitalno omrežje z Integrated Services Digital
integriranimi storitvami Network (ISDN)
(ISDN)
35.180 Terminalska in druga IT Terminal and other
periferna oprema IT peripheral equipment
SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
INTERIM
EUROPEAN I-ETS 300 489-2
TELECOMMUNICATION October 1996
STANDARD
Source: ETSI TC-TE Reference: DI/TE-01061-2
ICS: 33.080
Key words: FT, ISDN, protocol, testing
Terminal Equipment (TE);
Conformance testing for file transfer over
the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN);
Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for
the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
X.400: c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - Internet: secretariat@etsi.fr
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1996. All rights reserved.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 2
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 3
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Contents
Foreword .7
1 Scope .9
2 Normative references.9
3 Definitions, abbreviations and conventions.10
3.1 Definitions .10
3.2 Abbreviations .10
3.3 Conventions.11
4 General.11
5 Abstract Test Method (ATM).11
6 Test requirements .11
6.1 General requirements .11
6.2 Low layer requirements.12
6.3 Additional requirements .12
7 Profile Specific Test Specification .12
7.1 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 Initiator.12
7.1.1 Capability Test Cases .13
7.1.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases .14
7.1.3 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases .17
7.1.4 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.18
7.2 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 responder .19
7.2.1 Capability Test Cases .20
7.2.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases .21
7.2.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.24
7.3 Relevant Test Cases from full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 restart and recovery.25
7.3.1 Capability Test Cases initiator.25
7.3.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases initiator.26
7.3.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases initiator .27
7.3.4 Capability Test Cases responder .27
7.3.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases responder .28
7.3.6 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases responder.29
7.3.7 Invalid behaviour Test Cases responder.29
7.4 Relevant Test Cases from full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT3 Management .29
7.4.1 Capability Test Cases initiator.29
7.4.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases initiator.30
7.4.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases initiator .30
7.4.4 Capability Test Cases responder .31
7.4.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases responder .31
7.4.6 Invalid behaviour Test Cases responder.32
7.4.7 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases responder.32
7.5 Relevant Test Cases from ACSE .32
7.5.1 Valid behaviour Test Cases .32
7.5.2 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.33
7.6 Relevant Test Cases from the presentation layer.33
7.6.1 Interoperability Test Cases- initiator.33
7.6.2 Capability Test Cases - initiator.33
7.6.3 Valid behaviour Test Cases - initiator.34
7.6.4 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - initiator .34
7.6.5 Interoperability Test Cases - responder .34
7.6.6 Capability Test Cases - responder.35
7.6.7 Valid behaviour Test Cases- responder.35

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 4
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.6.8 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - responder. 36
7.7 Relevant Test Cases from the session layer. 36
7.7.1 Capability Test Cases - initiator . 36
7.7.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases - initiator. 37
7.7.3 Inopportune behaviour tests - Initiator . 38
7.7.4 Capability Test Cases - responder . 40
7.7.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases- responder . 40
7.7.6 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - responder. 41
8 Profile specific conformance tests. 42
8.1 Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP). 42
8.1.1 Test Suite Structure (TSS) . 42
8.1.2 Additional Test Purposes. 42
8.1.3 Test Cases to Test Purposes selection and mapping . 42
Annex A (normative): Abstract Test Suite (ATS). 43
A.1 The TTCN Graphical form (TTCN.GR) . 43
A.2 The TTCN Machine Processable form (TTCN.MP) . 43
Annex B (normative): Profile specific PIXIT proforma for ETS 300 388. 44
B.1 Identification summary. 44
B.1.1 Protocol PIXIT . 44
B.1.2 Profile specific test suite summary. 44
B.1.3 Test laboratory . 45
B.1.4 Client . 46
B.1.5 SUT . 47
B.1.6 Ancillary protocols . 47
B.2 Profile information for ETS 300 388 . 48
B.2.1 Profile specific information . 48
B.2.2 IUT information. 48
B.2.2.1 Addresses. 48
B.2.2.2 Procedural information. 48
B.2.3 Virtual file store information tester side. 48
B.2.3.1 FILE #1 . 49
B.2.3.2 FILE #2 . 51
B.2.3.3 FILE #3 . 52
Annex C (normative): Protocol Conformance Test Report proforma (PCTR) . 54
C.1 Identification summary. 54
C.1.1 Profile Conformance Test Report . 54
C.1.2 IUT. 54
C.1.3 Testing environment. 54
C.1.4 Limits and reservations . 54
C.1.5 Comments. 55
C.2 IUT conformance status . 55
C.3 Static conformance summary. 55
C.4 Dynamic conformance summary. 55
C.5 Static conformance review report . 55
C.6 Test campaign report. 55
C.7 Observations. 55
Annex D (normative): System Conformance Test Report proforma (SCTR) . 56

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 5
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
D.1 Identification summary .56
D.1.1 System conformance test report.56
D.1.2 Test laboratory.56
D.1.3 Client.56
D.1.4 SUT.56
D.1.5 Profile.57
D.1.6 Nature of conformance testing.57
D.1.7 Limits and reservations.57
D.1.8 Record of agreement.57
D.1.9 Comments .58
D.2 System report summary .59
D.2.1 Profile testing summary for ETS 300 388.59
D.2.2 Profile testing summary for ETS 300 080.60
D.2.3 Protocol layer testing summary for basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Initiator .61
D.2.4 Protocol layer testing summary for basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Responder .62
D.2.5 Protocol layer testing summary for Full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Initiator.63
D.2.6 Protocol layer testing summary for Full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Responder.64
D.2.7 Protocol layer testing summary for full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 restart and
recovery .65
D.2.8 Protocol layer testing summary for full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 3 management.66
D.2.9 Protocol layer testing summary for ACSE.67
D.2.10 Protocol layer testing summary for presentation .68
D.2.11 Protocol layer testing summary for session .69
Annex E (normative): System Conformance Statement proforma (SCS).70
E.1 Identification summary .70
E.1.1 SCS identification.70
E.1.2 IUT identification .70
E.1.3 Client identification.70
E.1.4 Supplier identification.70
E.1.5 Manufacturer identification (if different from client).71
E.1.6 Protocols identification.71
E.1.7 Profile identification.71
E.2 Miscellaneous system information .72
E.2.1 Configuration.72
E.2.2 Other information .72
Annex F (informative): FTAM profile conformance Test Cases count.73
History.74

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 6
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Blank page

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 7
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Foreword
Part 2 of this Interim European Telecommunication Standard (I-ETS) has been produced by the Terminal
Equipment Technical (TE) Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
An ETSI standard may be given I-ETS status either because it is regarded as a provisional solution ahead
of a more advanced standard, or because it is immature and requires a "trial period". The life of an I-ETS
is limited to three years after which it can be converted into an ETS, have its life extended for a further two
years, be replaced by a new version, or be withdrawn.
This is the second part of an I-ETS which comprises of two parts as follows:
"Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated Services Digital
Network (ISDN);
Part 1: Profile Test Specification Summary (PTS-Summary) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388);
Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)".
Proposed announcement date
Date of adoption of this I-ETS: 4 October 1996
Date of latest announcement of this I-ETS (doa): 31 January 1997

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 8
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Blank page

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 9
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
1 Scope
Part 2 of this Interim European Telecommunication Standard (I-ETS) provides the Profile Specific Test
Specification (PSTS) for ETS 300 388 [1]. It is compatible with the PSTS developed firstly under the CTS
projects and finally updated and published by the European Workshop for Open Systems (EWOS). The
minor additions to the Test Cases and the Tree and Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN) for these is
contained in annex A. The remainder of the Test Cases references EWOS ED 88 [4].
The PSTS follows the recommendations of ISO/IEC 9646-6 [2] and ETS 300 406 [3]. The base standard
is ISO/IEC 8571 [9]. The work follows ISO/IEC ISP 10607, part 3 [7] and part 6 [8]. These Sips are
referenced in ISO/IEC TR 10000-2 [16] as AFT 11 and AFT 3 respectively.
2 Normative references
This I-ETS incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications. These
normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications
apply to this I-ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the
latest edition of the publication referred to applies.
[1] ETS 300 388 (1995): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); File Transfer
and Access Management (FTAM) over ISDN based on simple file transfer
protocol".
[2] ISO/IEC 9646, parts 1 to 7 (1994): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework".
[3] ETS 300 406 (1995): "Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); Protocol
and profile conformance testing specifications; Standardization methodology".
[4] EWOS ED 88 (1994): "EWOS/CTS FTAM Abstract Test Suite, (Binders 0
to 12)".
[5] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 2:
Definition of document types, constraint sets and syntaxes".
[6] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2(a), Addendum 1 (1991): "Information technology -
International Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management
- Additional definitions".
[7] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-3 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 3:
AFT11 - Simple File Transfer Service (unstructured)".
[8] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-6 (1991): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 6:
AFT3 - File Management Service".
[9] ISO/IEC 8571, Parts 1 to 5: "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - File Transfer, Access and Management -
Part 1: General introduction;
Part 2: Virtual Filestore definition;
Part 3: File Service definition;
Part 4: File Protocol specification;
Part 5: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement Proforma 3".

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 10
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
[10] ETS 300 080 (1992): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); ISDN lower
layer protocols for telematic terminals".
[11] ISO 8649 (X.217) (1988): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Service definition for the association control service element".
[12] ISO 8650 (X.227) (1988): "Connection-oriented protocol specification for the
association control service-element".
[13] ISO/IEC 8822 (X.216): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection
- Presentation service definition".
[14] ISO/IEC 8823-1 (X.226): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Connection oriented presentation protocol: Protocol
specification".
[15] ISO 8327 (X.225): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Basic connection oriented session protocol specification".
[16] ISO/IEC TR 10000-2 (1994): "Information technology - Framework and
taxonomy of International Standardized Profiles - Part 2: Principles and
Taxonomy for OSI Profiles".
[17] ISO/IEC 10170-1 (1993): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance test suite for the FTAM Protocol - Part 1: Test
suite structure and test purposes".
3 Definitions, abbreviations and conventions
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this part of the I-ETS, the definitions given in ISO/IEC 9646, parts 1 to 7 [2],
ISO/IEC 8571 [9], ETS 300 388 [1] and ISO/IEC ISP 10607, parts 2, 2a, 3 and 6 ([5], [6], [7] and [8]) apply.
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this I-ETS, the following abbreviations apply:
ACSE Association Control Service Element
AFT Application File Transfer profile
ATC Abstract Test Case
ASN.1 Abstract Syntax Notation One
ATM Abstract Test Method
ATS Abstract Test Suite
e extended subset
EWOS European Workshop for Open Systems
FTAM File Transfer Access and Management
ICS Implementation Conformance Statement
ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
ISP International Standardized Profile
ISPICS ISP Implementation Conformance Statement
IUT Implementation Under Test
PIXIT Implementation eXtra Information for Testing
MTS Methods for Testing and Specification
PCO Point of Control and Observation
PCTR Protocol Conformance Test Report
PDU Protocol Data Unit
Profile ICS Profile Implementation Conformance Statement
PSTS Profile Specific Test Specification
s selected subset
SCS System Conformance Statement
SUT System Under Test

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 11
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
TE Terminal Equipment
TSAP Transport Service Access Point
TTCN Tree and Tabular Combined Notation
Along with the abbreviations of ISO/IEC 10170-1 [17].
3.3 Conventions
For the purposes of this I-ETS, the following conventions apply:
The names of Abstract Test Cases (ATC) are generally derived directly from the relevant Test Purpose
where there is a one to one mapping. There is, in addition, a prefix to indicate the Abstract Test Suite
(ATS) name and whether the tests are for the Initiator or Responder case.
EXAMPLE 1: A111_I_CA_KE_1.
However, especially in cases where several parameters on a single Protocol Data Unit (PDU) are being
tested by a series of Test Purposes, these can all be combined or "summarized" by a single ATC. The
name of that ATC reflects this by the use of "SUM" as the final part of the name.
EXAMPLE 2: A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_SUM_1.
4 General
This I-ETS describes all the aspects of testing, directly or by reference to EWOS ED 88 [4].
5 Abstract Test Method (ATM)
The FTAM conformance tests use the remote single layer Abstract Test Method (ATM), whilst the testing
for Session and Presentation uses the remote embedded single layer ATM.
6 Test requirements
6.1 General requirements
For this conformance test specification, any requirements to carry out the tests are specified.
To realize this conformance test specification it shall be necessary that all the lower layers are operating
correctly. For this reason, the lower layers shall be checked before by any relevant conformance test
specifications.
This test specification does not deal with the details of the human interface. Only PDUs and Parameters
are observed and are controlled at the Point of Control and Observation (PCO).
The relevant conformance test specifications are identified in figure 1.

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------

SIST I-ETS 300 489-2 E1:2003
Page 12
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Initiator/Responder/
Management
Restart and Recovery
FTAM ISO/IEC 8571
FTAM ISO/IEC 8571
[13], AFT3
[13], AFT11
ACSE
conformance test specification
SUT
Presentation layer
conformance test specification
Session layer
conformance test specification
ISDN
Figure 1: Relevant conformance tests specifications
6.2 Low layer requirements
Clause 10 of ETS 300 388 [1] shall apply without any additional rules.
6.3 Additional requirements
Two additional documents exist in the EWOS specifications. The first is called Initiator actions and defines
the requirements on an Initiator Implementation Under Test (IUT) in order to drive the tests. The second is
the Naming conventions used, where these go beyond ISO/IEC 10170-1 [17]. The relevant ones are
described in subclause 3.2.
In order to ensure that directories can be read two new Test Cases have been developed. These are
based on existing Test Purposes for capability tests but use NBS-9 document type.
7 Profile Specific Test Specification
An implementation claiming basic conformance shall be capable of performing all the AFT 11 Initiator and
Responder Test Cases listed below. An implementation claiming full conformance shall be capable of
performing all the Test Cases listed below.
However, since this profile is designed for small terminals, in order to reduce testing time, a
recommended subset of the FTAM specific tests has been selected. These are indicated by "s" (selected
subset) for the basic tests and "e" (extended subset) for full tests. It is bel
...