iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
SIST

kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024

(Main)

Space — SBAS receivers performances for maritime applications — MARESS Test report

Space — SBAS receivers performances for maritime applications — MARESS Test report

The objective of this document is to present the results of the tests defined in the IEC 61108-7 draft [1] performed with a maritime receiver updated based on the SBAS maritime guidelines [2] and other GNSS SBAS receivers.
The list of test scenarios prepared, the receiver analysed, the configuration used and procedures are included in Clause 4. In Clause 5, graphical and numerical results for each of the test performed are presented, including if the tests are passed or failed. Annex A provides additional information on the test case setup.

Raumfahrt - Leistung von SBAS-Empfängern für maritime Anwendungen - MARESS-Testbericht

Espace — Performances des récepteurs SBAS pour les applications maritimes — Rapport d'essais MARESS

Aeronavtika - Delovanje sprejemnikov SBAS za pomorske aplikacije - poročilo o preskusu MARESS

General Information

Status
Not Published
Public Enquiry End Date
30-Jul-2024
ICS
49.020 - Aircraft and space vehicles in general
Technical Committee
I13 - Imaginarni 13
Current Stage
5520 - Unique Acceptance Procedure (UAP) (Adopted Project)
Start Date
16-May-2024
Due Date
03-Oct-2024
Ref Project
FprCEN/TR 18104 - Space — SBAS receivers performances for maritime applications — MARESS Test report

Buy Standard

kTP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 - BARVEkTP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 - BARVE
PreviousNext
Draft
kTP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 - BARVE
English language
75 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024
01-julij-2024
Aeronavtika - Delovanje sprejemnikov SBAS za pomorske aplikacije - poročilo o
preskusu MARESS
Space — SBAS receivers performances for maritime applications — MARESS Test
report
Raumfahrt - Leistung von SBAS-Empfängern für maritime Anwendungen - MARESS-
Testbericht
Espace Performances des récepteurs SBAS pour les applications maritimes Rapport
d'essais MARESS
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: FprCEN/TR 18104
ICS:
49.020 Letala in vesoljska vozila na Aircraft and space vehicles in
splošno general
kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024


TECHNICAL REPORT FINAL DRAFT
FprCEN/TR 18104
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE

TECHNISCHER REPORT

May 2024
ICS

English version

Space - SBAS receivers performances for maritime
applications - MARESS Test report
Espace ¿ Performances des récepteurs SBAS pour les Raumfahrt - Leistung von SBAS-Empfängern für
applications maritimes ¿ Rapport d'essais MARESS maritime Anwendungen - MARESS-Testbericht


This draft Technical Report is submitted to CEN members for Vote. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/CLC/JTC 5.

CEN and CENELEC members are the national standards bodies and national electrotechnical committees of Austria, Belgium,
Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy,
Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia,
Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and United Kingdom.

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a Technical Report. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a Technical Report.





















CEN-CENELEC Management Centre:
Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2024 CEN/CENELEC All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means
Ref. No. FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 E
reserved worldwide for CEN national Members and for
CENELEC Members.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
kSIST-TP FprCEN/TR 18104:2024
FprCEN/TR 18104:2024 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Test scenarios . 5
4.1 General. 5
4.2 Test cases . 6
4.2.1 Test case #1: static accuracy and availability . 6
4.2.2 Test case #2: static accuracy with angular movement . 6
4.2.3 Test case #3: dynamic accuracy . 8
4.2.4 Test case #4: acquisition . 10
4.2.5 Test case #5: dynamic range . 11
4.2.6 Test case #6: position update . 12
4.2.7 Test case #7: SBAS processing .
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

SIST
SIST EN 9102:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality systems - First Article Inspection Requirement
EN 9102:2024

1.1 This document establishes the requirements for performing and documenting FAI. It is emphasized that the requirements specified in this document are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
In this document, the following verbal forms are used:
-   "shall" indicates a requirement;
-   "should" indicates a recommendation;
-   "may" indicates a permission;
-   "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
Information marked as "NOTE" is for guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement.
1.2 Purpose
The primary purpose of FAI is to verify and validate product realization processes capable of producing characteristics that meet engineering and design requirements. A FAI is not a product acceptance document. A well-planned and executed FAI by a multi-disciplinary team (e.g., members from responsible functions) provides objective evidence the manufacturer’s processes can produce compliant product, having effectively understood and incorporated the associated requirements.
NOTE    While interrelated, FAI and product acceptance are separate activities. FAI focus is verification of production processes via assessment of product. FAI and supporting documentation do not provide assurance regarding conformance for product acceptance purposes; neither does the lack of a FAI necessarily imply that the product is nonconforming to engineering and design requirements.
FAI will:
-   provide confidence that the product realization processes are capable of producing conforming product;
-   demonstrate that the manufacturers and processors of the product have an understanding of the associated requirements;
-   provide objective evidence of process capability;
-   mitigate risk associated with production startup and/or process changes;
-   provide assurance of product conformance at the start of production and after changes, as outlined in this document.
A FAI is intended to:
-   reduce future escapes, risks, and total costs;
-   help ensure product safety;
-   improve quality, delivery, and customer satisfaction;
-   reduce costs and production delays associated with product nonconformances;
-   identify product realization processes not capable of producing conforming product, and initiate and/or validate associated corrective actions.
1.3 Application
This document applies to organizations and sub-tiers responsible for product realization processes that produce the design characteristics of the product. The organization shall flow down the requirements of this document to suppliers who produce design characteristics.
This document applies to external suppliers performing special processes. A Certificate of Conformity (CoC) provided by processors attests to satisfying the specification requirements of the applicable design authority. External suppliers providing special processes can satisfy this document’s requirements by either:
-   documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a FAI;
-   documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a customer-defined detailed CoC.
This document applies to assemblies, sub-assemblies, and detail parts including castings, forgings, and modifications to document catalogue or Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items. Each of these items requires a stand-alone FAI.
Unless contractually required, this document does not apply to:
-   development and prototype parts that are not considered as part of the first production run;
-   procured standard catalogue items, COTS, or deliverable software. These items shall be documented in the index of part numbers in an assembly First Article Inspection Report (FAIR).

  • Standard
    28 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
  • Draft
    26 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9104-3:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Part 3: Requirements for Aviation, Space, and Defence Auditor Training, Development, Competence, and Authentication
EN 9104-3:2023

This document defines the minimum requirements for auditors, CBs, Auditor Authentication Bodies (AABs), Training Provider Approval Bodies (TPABs), and Training Providers (TPs) who participate in the IAQG Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme. The requirements in this standard supplement those defined within the EN 9104-1, EN 9104-2, ISO/IEC 17021-1, and ISO/IEC 17021-3 standards.
Data protection for the parties subject to this document and other relevant requirements of the ICOP scheme are managed via bi-lateral contracts between the joint controllers of the data.

  • Standard
    28 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9104-1:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Part 1: Requirements for Certification of aviation, space, and defense
EN 9104-1:2023

This document defines the industry-accepted requirements for the ICOP scheme, which provides confidence to ASD customers, that organizations with certification of their QMS, issued by accredited CBs, meet applicable AQMS standard requirements. The requirements in this document are applicable to all participants in the ICOP scheme. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.

  • Standard
    50 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9163:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Certificate of conformity requirements
EN 9163:2023

This document provides a harmonized process and documentation requirements for the establishment of Certificates of Conformance (CoCs) used to attest the conformity of aviation, space, and defence products (e.g. assemblies, sub-assemblies, equipment and systems, parts, material) or services). It includes a CoC template and supporting instructions on how to complete it.
When quoted by the customer in a contractual requirement, application of this document is mandatory. In other cases, its use is recommended, but if there is a conflict between the requirements of this document and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter take precedence.
Requirements for the establishment of Authorized Release Certificates (ARCs) [e.g. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 8130-3 tag] by an external provider holding a production approval (for new aviation products; production or spares) or maintenance approval (i.e. for in service repairs, modifications, after sales maintenance, overhaul activities, inspections) are not covered by this document, as applicable rules are defined by the aviation authorities having granted these approvals.

  • Standard
    12 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9101:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Requirements for conducting audits of aviation, space, and defence quality management Systems
EN 9101:2023

1.1   General
This document defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization’s QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements.
The requirements in this document are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e. ISO/IEC 17000, ISO/IEC 17021 1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of 9101 standard take precedence.
NOTE 1   In this document, the term "9100-series standards" comprises the 9100, 9110, and 9120 standards; developed by the IAQG and published by various national standards bodies.
NOTE 2   In addition to this document, the IAQG publishes deployment support material on the IAQG website (see http://www.sae.org/iaqg/) that can be used by audit teams, when executing the audit process.
1.2   Application
This document is intended to be used for audits of 9100-series standards by Certification Bodies (CBs) for certification of organizations, under the auspices of the ASD industry certification scheme [also known as the Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme]. The ICOP scheme requirements are defined in the 9104-series standards (i.e. EN 9104 001, EN 9104 002, EN 9104 003).
NOTE   Relevant parts of this document can also be used by an organization in support of internal audits (1st party) and external audits at suppliers (2nd party).

  • Standard
    30 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9103:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - Quality management systems - Variation management of key characteristics
EN 9103:2023

1.1   General
This document is primarily intended to apply to new parts and products intended to be produced in an on-going production phase but can also be applied to parts currently in production (e.g., manufacturing, maintenance). This document is applicable to all production processes that influence the variation of KCs, as well as maintenance and service processes in which KCs are identified. It applies to organizations for assemblies and all levels of parts within an assembly, down to the basic materials including castings and forgings, and to organizations that are responsible for producing the design characteristics of the product.
The variation control process begins with product definition, typically stated in the design documentation (e.g., digital model, engineering drawing, specification) which identifies KCs, and leads to a variation management process for those KCs. This process may also be used for producer-identified KCs (e.g., process KCs, additional/substitute product KCs).
Producers and their subcontractors are responsible for flow down of the standard requirements to those external providers, who produce design characteristics and provide production and service provisions, to ensure that KCs conform to the customer’s requirements.
1.2   Purpose
This document is designed to drive the improvement of manufacturing and maintenance processes through adequate planning and effective management of KC variation. This focus is intended to improve uniformity (less variation or minimum variation of product KCs) and acceptance probability of the end-product.
NOTE   Control of a product or process KC per this document does not constitute, nor imply acceptance of the resulting product. If variation management, under this document, is to be part of an acceptance decision, the requirements need to be specified in the applicable product acceptance plan or contract.
1.3   Convention
The following conventions are used in this document:
-   "shall" indicates a requirement;
-   "should" indicates a recommendation;
-   "may" indicates a permission;
-   "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.

  • Standard
    34 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9300-120:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D CAD and PDM data - Part 120: CAD 3D explicit geometry with graphic product and manufacturing information
EN 9300-120:2023

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information with respect to the geometry and related PMI produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 “CAD mechanical 3D explicit geometry information” about the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this document.
The meaning of terms "Presentation" and "Representation", defined in the EN 9300 100 “Common concepts for Long term archiving and retrieval of CAD 3D mechanical information” is required to understand this EN 9300 document.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of this document:
- the Presentation of 3D geometrical dimension and tolerance, and 3D annotation attributes;
- their possible semantic links with 3D Geometric shape;
- User Defined Attributes: that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting”, to illustrate the portion of the geometry to which a PMI element applies.
In this version, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on polyline and tessellated presentation. Polyline presentation is a conversion to lines and curves of all 3D annotations by the STEP interfaces of the CAD system, including validation properties.  Tessellated presentation is a conversion to tessellated curves and tessellated faces. The main use cases are the Certification and Product Liability of static information, however, re-use is also possible after the deletion of previous PMI and creation of new PMI (refer to clause 3 for definition).
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Representation”;
- how to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- -form features;
- -machining features;
- CAD Assemblies.

  • Standard
    26 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9300-121:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D CAD and PDM data - Part 121: Semantic representation of CAD 3D Explicit Geometry with Product and Manufacturing Information
EN 9300-121:2023

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the Semantic Representation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 concerning the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this Part.
The term “semantic representation” is defined in Clause 3 “Terms, definitions and abbreviations”.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of EN 9300 121:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Semantic Representation” (Refer to clause 3 for definition);
- the association of the above with 3D geometric shapes;
- the possible association of the above with Presentation of 3D Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI), and 3D annotations as defined in EN 9300 120.
In EN 9300 121, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on semantic representation. The main use cases are Certification, Product Liability and Design re-use.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting” for the purpose of human readability.
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- PMI presentation (defined in EN 9300 120);
- User defined attributes that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level. The archiving of the UDA is defined in EN 9300 120.
- How to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- - form features;
- - CAD Assemblies.
- The semantics of special Notes outside the scope of PMI: ITAR/EAR, proprietary, and title block information, etc.

  • Standard
    18 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9300-125:2024(Main)
Aerospace series - LOTAR - LOng Term Archiving and Retrieval of digital technical product documentation such as 3D, CAD and PDM data - Part 125: Explicit CAD assembly structure with Graphic Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI)
EN 9300-125:2023

1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long-term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of CAD assembly structure. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
This will allow the retrieval of the assembly structure including the placement information.
This standard extends EN 9300-115 “Explicit CAD Assembly Structure” by including assembly level PMI.
PMI for the assembly structure can be recorded in the same file as the geometry, can be in a nested assembly structure or the PMI will be contained in its own separate file (Side-Car).
The PMI elements shall be presented on the graphic level only (i.e. polyline, tessellated).
1.2 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- The archiving of assembly Form Features.
- Semantic PMI representation is out of scope for this document.
- The geometry defined at assembly level is out of scope for this document.
(This document covers PMI at the assembly level only.)

  • Standard
    24 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day
SIST
SIST EN 9722:2023(Main)
Aerospace series - Architecture for integrated management of a system's health condition
EN 9722:2023

This recommendation is mainly aimed at all the trades which are actively involved in managing the health of a system.
Although it relies on examples of aeronautical systems, the expert group considers that these general recommendations are of interest for systems from other areas.

  • Standard
    67 pages
    English language
    sale 10% off
    e-Library read for
    1 day