Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 5: Installation and securing of child in a booster system

ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of usability of booster seat child restraint systems (CRS) when installing them and securing a child. ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of: - ease of availability of instructions; - clarity of instruction manual and labelling; and - ease of use of design related features of the CRS related to the installation in a vehicle. The procedure can also be used for evaluation of vehicle integrated booster systems. NOTE Although ISOFIX is defined in the original "ISOFIX" standard (ISO 13216‑1) to be a rigid system, the term "ISOFIX" in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (LATCH, UAS).

Véhicules routiers — Méthodes et critères pour l'évaluation de la facilité d'utilisation des systèmes de retenue pour enfants, et leurs interfaces avec les systèmes d'ancrage dans le véhicule — Partie 5: Installation et fixation d'un enfant dans un système de réhausseur

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Nov-2017
Current Stage
9092 - International Standard to be revised
Start Date
07-Dec-2022
Completion Date
13-Dec-2025

Relations

Effective Date
06-Jun-2022

Overview

ISO 29061-5:2017 - Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems (CRS) - Part 5 focuses on the installation and securing of a child in a booster system. The standard defines objective, repeatable procedures and scoring criteria to judge the usability of booster seats (with or without seatbacks), including vehicle‑integrated boosters. It addresses the clarity and availability of instructions and labelling, and the ease of use of design features that affect correct installation and child securing. The term ISOFIX is extended in this part to include flexible attachment systems (LATCH, UAS).

Key topics and technical requirements

  • Scope of evaluation: Separate assessment of the booster system, usability when installing in specified vehicle seating positions, and securing a child or child dummy in the booster.
  • Instruction and labelling: Criteria for the ease of availability, clarity of the instruction manual, durability of labels, consistency between manual and on‑product labelling, and use of pictograms or illustrative video.
  • Design and hardware: Assessment of conversion steps (multi‑mode CRS), need for tools, single‑action operations, positioning devices, and adjustability features.
  • Usability procedure:
    • Intended to be completed by a small team (typically two people) familiar with CRS terminology but preferably unfamiliar with the model under test.
    • Typical evaluation time is about 30 minutes.
    • Required materials include the usability evaluation form (paper or electronic), vehicle owner’s manual, CRS manual/video, and a force gauge.
  • Scoring system:
    • Each item is rated Good / Average / Poor (3 / 1 / 0 points) and assigned an importance rating A / B / C (3 / 2 / 1 points).
    • Item score = quality score × importance score (maximum 9 points for a Good/A item).
    • Final results are expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score for the tested configuration.
  • Documentation: Usability forms and example spreadsheets are provided (revisable MS Excel format) via the ISO link for the standard.

Practical applications and users

ISO 29061-5:2017 is valuable for:

  • CRS manufacturers - to design booster seats that are easy and safe to install and to validate instructions and labelling.
  • Vehicle manufacturers - to evaluate interface with seat belts and integrated booster solutions.
  • Test labs and certification bodies - to perform standardized usability testing and report comparable results.
  • Consumer organizations and retailers - to produce usability ratings and guidance for caregivers.
  • Regulators and safety researchers - to inform policy and improve child passenger safety through evidence‑based usability metrics.

Related standards

  • ISO 13216-1 - ISOFIX (original ISOFIX standard; referenced in this document)
  • ISO 9241-11 - Usability definition (referenced for term “usability”)
  • Other parts of the ISO 29061 series - for broader CRS usability evaluation methods

Keywords: ISO 29061-5:2017, booster seat usability, child restraint system (CRS), ISOFIX, LATCH, UAS, vehicle anchorage, CRS instructions, usability scoring.

Standard

ISO 29061-5:2017 - Road vehicles -- Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems

English language
18 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Frequently Asked Questions

ISO 29061-5:2017 is a standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 5: Installation and securing of child in a booster system". This standard covers: ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of usability of booster seat child restraint systems (CRS) when installing them and securing a child. ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of: - ease of availability of instructions; - clarity of instruction manual and labelling; and - ease of use of design related features of the CRS related to the installation in a vehicle. The procedure can also be used for evaluation of vehicle integrated booster systems. NOTE Although ISOFIX is defined in the original "ISOFIX" standard (ISO 13216‑1) to be a rigid system, the term "ISOFIX" in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (LATCH, UAS).

ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of usability of booster seat child restraint systems (CRS) when installing them and securing a child. ISO 29061-5:2017 provides criteria for judgement of: - ease of availability of instructions; - clarity of instruction manual and labelling; and - ease of use of design related features of the CRS related to the installation in a vehicle. The procedure can also be used for evaluation of vehicle integrated booster systems. NOTE Although ISOFIX is defined in the original "ISOFIX" standard (ISO 13216‑1) to be a rigid system, the term "ISOFIX" in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (LATCH, UAS).

ISO 29061-5:2017 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 43.040.80 - Crash protection and restraint systems. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ISO 29061-5:2017 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ISO 29061-5. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ISO 29061-5:2017 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 29061-5
First edition
2017-12
Road vehicles — Methods and criteria
for usability evaluation of child
restraint systems and their interface
with vehicle anchorage systems —
Part 5:
Installation and securing of child in a
booster system
Véhicules routiers — Méthodes et critères pour l'évaluation de la
facilité d'utilisation des systèmes de retenue pour enfants, et leurs
interfaces avec les systèmes d'ancrage dans le véhicule —
Partie 5: Installation et fixation d'un enfant dans un système de
réhausseur
Reference number
©
ISO 2017
© ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles . 2
4.1 Evaluation procedure . 2
4.2 Scoring system . 3
5 Usability evaluation forms . 3
Annex A (informative) Recommendations regarding scoring and assessment .16
Annex B (informative) Example usability rating classes .17
Bibliography .18
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following
URL: www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 36,
Safety and impact testing.
A list of all parts in the ISO 29061 series can be found on the ISO website.
iv © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Introduction
The usability of a child restraint system (CRS) in terms of ease of:
— installation of child restraint systems in various vehicles; and
— day-to-day use with a child (securing, harnessing, adaption for a growing child, etc.)
is of utmost importance to ensure that a child restraint system is used properly in accordance with the
manufacturer's intentions, and to ensure that it will provide maximum protection in a crash situation.
An international agreement on usability criteria and measurements is beneficial for both consumers
and manufacturers.
The aim of this document is to develop and validate a usability evaluation system for installation of
child restraint systems with vehicle seat belts, to promote improved design for easy and correct use.
It provides child restraint and vehicle manufacturers with a tool for the assessment of the usability
of new and current systems. At the same time, it provides consumers (parents and caregivers) with
usability information on the key features related to the proper use of the attachment system, and assist
them in selecting child restraints and vehicles that are easy to use properly.
The ISO usability evaluation system has been developed with participation from, and considering the
experiences from, usability rating systems of Canada (Transport Canada and ICBC), USA (NHTSA), EU
(NPACS and consumer rating programmes, such as ICRT, ADAC).
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 29061-5:2017(E)
Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability
evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface
with vehicle anchorage systems —
Part 5:
Installation and securing of child in a booster system
1 Scope
This document provides criteria for judgement of usability of booster seat child restraint systems (CRS)
when installing them and securing a child.
The document provides criteria for judgement of:
— ease of availability of instructions;
— clarity of instruction manual and labelling; and
— ease of use of design related features of the CRS related to the installation in a vehicle.
The procedure can also be used for evaluation of vehicle integrated booster systems.
NOTE Although ISOFIX is defined in the original “ISOFIX” standard (ISO 13216-1) to be a rigid system, the
term “ISOFIX” in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (LATCH, UAS).
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
audible
capable of being heard in normal environmental conditions
3.2
booster system
any kind of belt-positioning child restraint system (3.3) where the adult seat belt is the primary restraint
for the child
3.3
child restraint system
CRS
free-standing device intended to provide child vehicle occupants with an approved restraint
Note 1 to entry: CRSs comprise various categories such as car beds, infant restraints, toddler seats (forward and
rearward-facing), booster cushions, and booster seats. Combination products may cover two or more of these
product categories.
3.3.1
multiple modes CRS
type of CRS (3.3) that can be used in several modes, for example converting from integral to non-
integral, or for use in different orientations
3.4
misuse
any deviation from the intended application and use of a CRS (3.3) that might reduce its protective
performance
3.5
pictogram
illustration or photo used to represent a concept or an operation, which can be supplemented by text
3.6
single action
operation that can be completed without the need to undertake a secondary action
EXAMPLE A single action includes tightening a strap by pulling it without the need to release a locking
system, or attaching to an anchorage without the need to depress the seat cushion.
3.7
slack
unintended looseness of a strap that is likely to affect the performance of the CRS (3.3) adversely
3.8
usability
extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specified goals with effectiveness,
efficiency and satisfaction in a specified context of use
Note 1 to entry: Interpretation of the generic definition for the purpose of this document: the extent to which
a CRS (3.3) is capable of being used and is convenient and practical in use (separately or in combination with a
vehicle).
[SOURCE: ISO 9241-11:1998, 3.1, modified — a new Note 1 to entry has been added.]
4 Usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles
4.1 Evaluation procedure
This document provides a procedure to evaluate the usability of booster systems, i.e. booster seats with
or without seatbacks, including booster seats integrated in the vehicle seat, and the securing of a child
in the seat. The procedure evaluates the ease of availability of instruction, clarity of instruction manual
and labelling, and the ease of use of design-related features of the CRS related to the installation in a
vehicle.
The assessment is done in three steps:
— a separate assessment of the booster system;
— a usability assessment when installing the booster system in specified vehicle seating positions; and
2 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

— securing a child or child dummy in the booster system.
The evaluation takes into consideration the various modes of installation and conversions between
installation modes. The usability protocol, consisting of two forms, is intended to be objective and
repeatable.
The evaluation is most easily accomplished using a team of two people having basic knowledge of
child restraints and being familiar with the technical terms used. However, they should preferably be
unfamiliar with the CRS model to be evaluated. The procedure takes about 30 min.
The necessary materials include:
— the usability evaluation form (in either paper or electronic format);
— the vehicle owner’s manual;
— the CRS manual, including instruction video if applicable; and
— a force gauge for measuring belt tension.
A copy of the terms and definitions from this document may also be helpful.
Initially, the booster system should be in the condition as supplied to the consumer. The evaluation
process includes all the steps, including assembly, to complete the installation.
Unpacking the CRS, removing the box and plastic protections, detaching the handbook, etc., should be
disregarded in the evaluation, but other initial one-time preparations are considered and assessed in
the forms.
The mode of use for the booster system and the seating position in the vehicle should be determined in
advance and documented in the evaluation form.
The evaluation process first addresses the labels and instructions, then the ease of positioning the
booster seat followed by securing the child or child dummy, and finally the removal of the child restraint
system. Installation and removal does not apply to integrated systems.
4.2 Scoring system
The scoring system consists of a Good/Average/Poor rating (scored with 3/1/0 points) of each
item assessed, and an importance rating A/B/C (scored with 3/2/1 points) for each item. For each
assessment, the scoring of the above are multiplied. A maximum score for a "Good" solution on an item
with "A" importance is 9 points.
In this document, “average” means “mid-level” and should not be perceived as a statistical average
between good and poor.
The maximum possible score will depend on the features of the booster system. Different products
may have different maximum possible scores, and therefore, comparisons of the raw number of total
points would not be meaningful. The final rating consists of a total number of points that should be
expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score for the particular conditions. See also further
recommendations given in Annex A.
5 Usability evaluation forms
See the following pages.
To enhance the value and applicability of this document, the forms are also provided in a revisable
1)
[MS Excel ] format. These forms are provided at the following URL: http://standards.iso.
org/iso/29061/-5/ed-1/en.
1) MS Excel is an example of a suitable product available commercially. This information is given for the convenience
of users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by ISO of this product.
4 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

Date of evaluation Evaluated by Test no.

Form 1: Booster system, separate evaluation
Child restraint system evaluated  Backless booster cushion Booster seat with seatback  Integrated booster system  Other (convertible/combination, etc.)
Manufacturer Describe:
Child seat make and model Booster system features:
Country/Region of use  Multiple modes CRS (2-in-1)  Multiple modes CRS (3-in-1)
Approval no. (where applicable)  Booster seat using ISOFIX anchorages evaluated  with /  without ISOFIX
Production no.  Booster seat with removable seatback:  Seatback on  Seatback off
Date of manufacturing, yyyy-mm-dd

Appropriate child size range for this
mode according to manual Mass range (kg): Height range (cm): Age range (months or years):

6 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved
Form 1.1: CRS instructions and labels
Good Avera
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...