ISO 29061-1
(Main)Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments
Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments
Véhicules routiers — Méthodes et critères pour l'évaluation de la facilité d'utilisation des systèmes de retenue pour enfants, et leurs interfaces avec les systèmes d'ancrage dans le véhicule — Partie 1: Véhicules et systèmes de retenue pour enfants équipés d'ancrages et d'attaches ISOFIX
General Information
- Status
- Not Published
- Technical Committee
- ISO/TC 22/SC 36 - Safety and impact testing
- Drafting Committee
- ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2 - Child restraint systems
- Current Stage
- 6000 - International Standard under publication
- Start Date
- 13-Dec-2025
- Completion Date
- 17-Jan-2026
Relations
- Effective Date
- 23-Apr-2020
Overview
ISO 29061-1:2025 is an international standard developed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) that establishes methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems (CRSs) and their interfaces with vehicle anchorage systems specifically equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments. This standard focuses on ensuring that child restraint systems are user-friendly, easy to install, and correctly interfaced with vehicles to maximize child occupant safety.
This standard replaces its 2010 edition and includes updated terminology and editorial improvements to reflect advances in technology and regulatory frameworks concerning child restraint system usability.
Key Topics
Usability Evaluation of ISOFIX Systems:
The standard outlines the procedure for assessing both ISOFIX attachments on CRSs and the ISOFIX anchorages in vehicles. This evaluation ensures consistent installation, easy daily use, and strong system compatibility between child seats and vehicles.Evaluation Procedures and Scoring:
ISO 29061-1 provides a detailed methodology for usability assessment, including the use of forms and scoring methods. The evaluation involves analyzing labels, instructions, installation ease, removal, and anti-rotational devices such as top tethers and support legs.Interface Assessment:
It emphasizes testing the interaction between specific CRSs and vehicle seating positions to identify usability challenges unique to certain combinations.Terminology and Definitions:
The document defines critical terms related to ISOFIX systems such as anchorages, attachments, anti-rotational devices, harnesses, seat bight, and others to standardize language and understanding across manufacturers and regulators.Usability Components:
The standard covers both rigid and flexible ISOFIX attachments, including variants used internationally like LATCH in the USA and UAS in Canada, expanding the scope of applicability.
Applications
Automotive Manufacturers:
Vehicle producers can use ISO 29061-1 to design and validate vehicle seating configurations that optimize the ease of ISOFIX child restraint system installation, ensuring improved consumer safety and satisfaction.Child Restraint System Designers:
CRS manufacturers benefit from a clear framework to develop better-designed ISOFIX attachments and user instructions, facilitating correct installation and daily usability.Consumer Safety Organizations:
Organizations evaluating child restraint products can apply this standard’s criteria to rate ISOFIX systems systematically, guiding parents and caregivers toward safer and more practical child seats.Regulatory Bodies:
Regulators can adopt ISO 29061-1 to harmonize usability requirements and incorporate standards-based testing protocols in vehicle safety regulations.Parents and Caregivers:
Enhanced usability leads to greater confidence in selecting and installing child restraint systems correctly, directly impacting child safety on the road.
Related Standards
ISO 13216-1:
Defines the original ISOFIX system and dimensions for anchorages and attachments, forming the technical basis for ISO 29061-1 evaluations.UN Regulation No. 129:
Addresses enhanced child restraint systems (ECRS) and complements the usability criteria within ISO 29061-1.ISO 13216-4:
Specifies lower tether anchorages, which are referenced within the usability and interface requirements.Consumer Safety Standards such as ASTM and FMVSS:
While regional, these standards often intersect with ISO 29061-1 requirements for child safety restraints and anchorage systems.
Keywords: ISO 29061-1, child restraint system usability, ISOFIX anchorages, vehicle anchorage systems, child car seats, child passenger safety, CRS installation, anti-rotational devices, vehicle seat safety, international child restraint standards.
ISO/PRF 29061-1 - Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems — Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments Released:14. 11. 2025
REDLINE ISO/PRF 29061-1 - Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems — Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments Released:14. 11. 2025
Frequently Asked Questions
ISO 29061-1 is a draft published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Its full title is "Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments". This standard covers: Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments
Road vehicles - Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems - Part 1: Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages and attachments
ISO 29061-1 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 43.040.80 - Crash protection and restraint systems. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ISO 29061-1 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ISO 29061-1:2010. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ISO 29061-1 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
International
Standard
Second edition
Road vehicles — Methods and
criteria for usability evaluation of
child restraint systems and their
interface with vehicle anchorage
systems —
Part 1:
Vehicles and child restraint systems
equipped with ISOFIX anchorages
and attachments
Véhicules routiers — Méthodes et critères pour l'évaluation de la
facilité d'utilisation des systèmes de retenue pour enfants, et leurs
interfaces avec les systèmes d'ancrage dans le véhicule —
Partie 1: Véhicules et systèmes de retenue pour enfants équipés
d'ancrages et d'attaches ISOFIX
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
Reference number
© ISO 2025
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 ISOFIX usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles . 4
4.1 Evaluation procedure .4
4.2 Scoring system . .5
5 Usability evaluation forms . 5
Annex A (informative) Recommendations regarding scoring and assessment .21
Annex B (informative) Example usability rating classes .22
Bibliography .23
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee
has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely
with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent
rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a)
patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that
this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 36, Safety
and impact testing.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 29061-1:2010), which has been technically
revised.
The main changes compared to the previous edition are as follows:
— reviewed terminology to cover technology and regulation updates since the first edition;
— editorial review.
A list of all parts in the ISO 29061 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
iv
Introduction
The usability of a child restraint system (CRS) in terms of ease of:
— installation of CRSs in various vehicles; and
— day-to-day use with a child (e.g. securing, harnessing, adaption for a growing child)
is of utmost importance to ensure that a CRS is used properly in accordance with the manufacturer's
intentions, and to ensure that a correctly installed CRS will provide the best possible protection in a
crash situation. An international agreement on usability criteria and measurements is beneficial for both
consumers and manufacturers.
The aim of this document is to provide a usability evaluation system for ISOFIX systems to promote improved
ISOFIX design for easy and correct use.
It provides child restraint and vehicle manufacturers with a tool for the assessment of the usability of new
and current ISOFIX systems. At the same time, it provides consumers (parents and caregivers) with usability
information on the key features related to the proper use of the ISOFIX system and assists them in selecting
CRSs and vehicles with ISOFIX systems that are easier to use properly.
The ISO usability evaluation system has been developed with participation from, and considering the
experiences from, usability rating systems of Canada (Transport Canada and ICBC), USA (NHTSA, IIHS) and
the European Union (EU) (NPACS and consumer rating programmes, such as ICRT, ADAC).
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
v
International Standard ISO 29061-1:2025(en)
Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability evaluation
of child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle
anchorage systems —
Part 1:
Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX
anchorages and attachments
1 Scope
This document provides criteria for judgement of usability of child restraint systems (CRSs) with ISOFIX
attachments and their corresponding anchorage systems in vehicles.
This document provides criteria for a separate evaluation of the CRS ISOFIX attachments, of the ISOFIX
anchorage installation in vehicles, and an evaluation of the interface issues when installing a CRS in a certain
vehicle.
This document covers both rigid and flexible attachments of the CRS to the vehicle ISOFIX anchorages.
NOTE 1 CRS includes enhanced child restraint system (ECRS) according to UN Regulation No. 129.
NOTE 2 Although ISOFIX is defined in the original “ISOFIX” standard (ISO 13216-1) to be a rigid system, the term
“ISOFIX” in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (e.g. LATCH in USA, UAS in Canada).
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
anchorage
part of the universal interface provided in a vehicle
Note 1 to entry: See also ISOFIX anchorages (3.9.2), top tether anchorage (3.17.1) and lower tether anchorage (3.13).
3.2
anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict forward or rearward rotation of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
3.2.1
primary anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict forward rotation of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
EXAMPLE Top tether (3.17) or support leg (3.16).
3.2.2
secondary anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
EXAMPLE Rebound bar (3.11) or lower tether (3.12).
3.3
attachment
part of the universal interface provided with the child restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
Note 1 to entry: See also ISOFIX attachments (3.9.3).
3.4
audible
capable of being heard in normal environmental conditions
3.5
base
part of the child restraint system (CRS) (3.6) equipped with ISOFIX attachments (3.9.3) which can be attached
to the ISOFIX anchorages (3.9.2) separately from the CRS shell
Note 1 to entry: The CRS shell is attached on the CRS base in the normal use.
3.6
child restraint system
CRS
free-standing device intended to provide child vehicle occupants with an approved restraint
Note 1 to entry: CRSs comprise various categories such as car beds, infant-only restraints, toddler seats (forward or
rearward-facing), booster cushions, and booster seats. Combination products (multi modes CRS) cover two or more of
these product categories.
3.7
connector
connecting and locking device to the universal interface, provided with the child restraint system (CRS) (3.6),
and part of the attachment (3.3)
3.8
slack
looseness of an adjustable strap that is likely to affect the performance of the child restraint system (CRS)
(3.6) adversely
3.8.1
hidden slack
unintended looseness of an adjustable strap that is likely to affect the performance of the child restraint
system (CRS) (3.6) adversely, and that cannot be easily detected
3.9
ISOFIX
system for the connection of child restraint systems (CRSs) (3.6) to vehicles, which has two rigid anchorages
(3.1) in a vehicle seating position located near the seat bight (3.14), corresponding rigid attachments (3.3) on
the CRS, and a means to limit the pitch rotation of the CRS
Note 1 to entry: In this document, the term ISOFIX is extended to include flexible CRS attachments, e.g. LATCH (Lower
Anchorages and Tethers for CHildren) in USA and UAS (Universal Anchorage System) in Canada.
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-1:1999, 3.6, modified — Note 1 to entry has been added.]
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
3.9.1
ISOFIX accessibility tester
device used to check the accessibility of an ISOFIX anchorage (3.9.2)
Note 1 to entry: The dimensions are defined in ISO 13216-1:1999, Figure 3.
3.9.2
ISOFIX anchorage
one of two (2) prescribed 6 mm diameter round horizontal bars, in accordance with ISO 13216-1:1999,
provided at a vehicle seating position and extending from vehicle seat bight (3.14) or seat structure to accept
and restrain a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6) with prescribed attachments (3.3)
Note 1 to entry: Anchorages (3.1) may be rigid or semi-rigid according to ISO 13216-1:1999, Annex A.
3.9.3
ISOFIX attachment
one of two (2) prescribed connections, in accordance with ISO 13216-1:1999, extending from the child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6) structure, and compatible with an anchorage (3.1)
Note 1 to entry: Attachments (3.3) may be rigid or non-rigid (flexible) according to ISO 13216-1:1999, Annex B.
3.10
pictogram
illustration or photo used to represent a concept or an operation
Note 1 to entry: A pictogram can be supplemented by text.
3.11
rebound bar
type of anti-rotational device (3.2) intended to restrict the rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
Note 1 to entry: It usually comprises a rigid device that, when in its operational position, rests against the vehicle
seatback.
3.12
lower tether
type of anti-rotational device (3.2) intended to restrict the rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6)
Note 1 to entry: It usually comprises a tether strap or other hardware attached near the back or base (3.5) of the
CRS that connects to a lower tether anchorage (3.13). It incorporates a device to enable it to be connected to such an
anchorage (3.1).
3.13
lower tether anchorage
anchorage (3.1) on the vehicle seat track or on or close to the vehicle floor to which a lower tether (3.12) can
be attached
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-4:2020, 3.1]
3.14
seat bight
area close to the intersection of the surfaces of the vehicle seat cushion and the seat back
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-1:1999, 3.8, modified — “or squab” was deleted from the end of the definition.]
3.15
single action
operation that can be completed without the need to undertake a secondary action
EXAMPLE This includes tightening a strap by pulling it without the need to release a locking system; or attaching
to an anchorage (3.1) without the need to depress the seat cushion.
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
3.16
support leg
type of anti-rotational device (3.2) comprising a permanent attachment (3.3) to a child restraint system (CRS)
(3.6), or a base (3.5) of a CRS, creating a compressive load path between the CRS and a vehicle structure (for
example, the vehicle floor) to prevent or reduce forward rotation of the CRS
Note 1 to entry: A support leg can be adjustable.
3.17
top tether
tether strap (or equivalent) attached at or near the top of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6), incorporating a
device to enable it to be connected to a top tether anchorage (3.17.1)
3.17.1
top tether anchorage
device, such as a ring, bar, bracket, or webbing loop, and its underlying structure, either user-ready or
aftermarket-installed, to which a top tether (3.17) can be attached
3.17.2
top tether strap
webbing strap which extends from the top of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6) to the top tether anchorage
(3.17.1) and which is equipped with an adjustment device, a tension-relieving device and a top tether (3.17)
connector (3.7)
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-2:2004, 3.3]
3.18
usability
extent to which a vehicle or child restraint system (CRS) (3.6) is capable of being used and is convenient and
practical in use (separately or combined)
3.19
visible
capable of being seen without tools (other than spectacles) in normal environmental conditions
3.20
harness
child restraint system (CRS) (3.6) belt assembly comprising shoulder restraints, a crotch strap and optionally
lap straps
4 ISOFIX usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles
4.1 Evaluation procedure
This document provides a procedure to evaluate the usability of ISOFIX attachments on CRSs, ISOFIX
hardware in vehicle seating positions, and the interface between ISOFIX systems for specific combinations
of CRSs and vehicle seating positions. The evaluation takes into consideration CRSs that are equipped with
either flexible or rigid ISOFIX attachments including those that include a top tether or other anti-rotation
device(s). The usability protocol is intended to be objective and repeatable.
The evaluation is most easily accomplished using a team of two people having basic knowledge of CRSs and
being familiar with the technical terms used. However, they should preferably be unfamiliar with the CRS
model to be evaluated.
The procedure for all three aspects of the process: the CRS, the vehicle seating position and the resulting
interface, takes about 45 min.
The necessary materials include:
— the usability evaluation form (in either paper or electronic format);
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
— the vehicle owner’s instruction manual;
— the CRS instruction manual, including instruction video if applicable; and
— a screwdriver, or a simple prying/turning tool.
A copy of the terms and definitions from this document can also be helpful.
For the independent assessment of CRS ISOFIX connector function, the use of an ISOFIX bar dummy is
recommended. In its simplest form this can be a straight 6 mm bar of at least 280 mm length, it can consist
of two aligned ISOFIX anchorages connected to a rigid supporting material, or a demo seat equipped with
ISOFIX anchorages.
For the independent assessment of vehicle ISOFIX anchorages and the available space around them, the use
of an ISOFIX accessibility tester, or a standard ISOFIX connector is recommended, fulfilling the requirements
of ISO 13216-1:1999, Figure 3.
Initially, the CRS shall be in the condition as supplied to the consumer. The evaluation process includes all
the steps necessary, including assembly, to complete the installation.
Unpacking the CRS, removing the box, plastic protections, detaching the handbook, etc. shall be disregarded
in the evaluation, but other initial one-time preparations are considered and assessed in the forms.
The mode of use for the CRS (i.e. forward-facing/rearward-facing, upright/reclined, with base/without base)
and the seating position in the vehicle shall be determined in advance and documented in the evaluation form.
The evaluation process first addresses the labels and instructions, followed by the ease of installation and
removal of the CRS.
4.2 Scoring system
The scoring system consists of a good/average/poor rating (scored with 3/1/0 points) of each item assessed,
and an importance rating A/B/C (scored with 3/2/1 points) for each item. For each assessment the scoring of
the above are multiplied. A maximum score for a “good” solution on an item with “A” importance is 9 points.
In this document, “average” means “mid-level” and shall not be perceived as a statistical average between
good and poor.
The maximum possible score will depend on the features and usage of the restraint and vehicle. Different
products can have different maximum possible scores and therefore comparisons of the raw number of
total points would not be appropriate. The final rating consists of a total number of points that shall be
expressed as a percentage of the maximum possible score for the particular conditions. See also further
recommendations given in Annex A. An example of usability rating classes is given in Annex B.
In addition, in some instances the rating will result in a total poor rating (or fail) if the product evaluated
does not score either a “good” or “average” in the most crucial questions of this rating. These instances are
identified in the evaluation sheets in the “notes” column against the relevant questions.
5 Usability evaluation forms
The following are the usability evaluation forms:
— Form 1: ISOFIX child restraint system;
— Form 2: Vehicle ISOFIX and top tether anchorages;
— Form 3: Interface — Installing the CRS, or base with seat, in the vehicle.
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
To enhance the value and applicability of this document, the forms are also provided in a revisable [MS
1)
Excel ] format. These forms are provided at the following URL: https:// standards .iso .org/ iso/ 29061/ -1/ ed
-2/ en/ .
1) MS Excel is an example of a suitable product available commercially. This information is given for the convenience of
users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by ISO of this product.
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
PROOF/ÉPREUVE
Form 1: ISOFIX child restraint system
For the independent assessment of CRS ISOFIX connector function, the use of an ISOFIX bar dummy is recommended (see 4.1).
Date of evaluation Evaluated by Test no.
Flexible attach-
Child restraint ISOFIX system Rigid attachments ments Top tether Support leg Secondary anti-rotational device
Manufacturer
a
Child seat make/brand and model Base make/brand and model
Country/region of use Country/region of use
b b
Certification/type approval no. Certification/type approval no.
Production no. (serial no./SAI no., Production no. (serial no./SAI no.,
etc.) etc.)
Date of manufacturing (yyyy-mm-
dd) Date of manufacturing (yyyy-mm-dd)
Forward-facing Rearward-fac-
Mode tested ing
Type (infant, group 0, integral, A2,
etc.) CRS inclination tested Upright/normal Reclined
Appropriate child size range for
this mode according to instruction
manual Mass range (kg): Height range (cm): Age
...
ISO/DISPRF 29061-1:2025(en)
ISO/TC 22/SC 36/WG 2
Secretariat: SIS AFNOR
Date: 2025-07-1511-13
Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of
child restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage
systems — —
Part 1:
Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX
anchorages and attachments
Véhicules routiers — Méthodes et critères pour l'évaluation de la facilité d'utilisation des systèmes de retenue
pour enfants, et leurs interfaces avec les systèmes d'ancrage dans le véhicule — Partie 1: Véhicules et systèmes
de retenue pour enfants équipés d’ancrages et attaches ISOFIX
Partie 1: Véhicules et systèmes de retenue pour enfants équipés d'ancrages et d'attaches ISOFIX
PROOF
ISO/PRF 29061-1:2025(en)
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication
may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying,
or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO
at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: + 41 22 749 01 11
EmailE-mail: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
ISO/DISPRF 29061-1:2025(en)
Contents
Foreword . iv
Introduction . v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 ISOFIX usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles. 5
4.1 Evaluation procedure . 5
4.2 Scoring system . 6
5 Usability evaluation forms . 6
Annex A (informative) Recommendations regarding scoring and assessment . 25
Annex B (informative) Example usability rating classes . 27
Bibliography . 28
iii
ISO/PRF 29061-1:2025(en)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through
ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types of
ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the
ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
ISO draws attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the use of (a)
patent(s). ISO takes no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any claimed patent rights
in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO had not received notice of (a) patent(s)
which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers are cautioned that this may not
represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent database available at
www.iso.org/patents. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 22, Road vehicles, Subcommittee SC 36, Safety
and impact testing.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 29061-1:2010), which has been technically
revised.
The main changes compared to the previous edition are as follows:
— — reviewed terminology to cover technology and regulation updates since the first edition;
— — editorial review.
A list of all parts in the ISO 29061 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html.
iv
ISO/DISPRF 29061-1:2025(en)
Introduction
The usability of a child restraint system (CRS) in terms of ease of:
— — installation of CRSs in various vehicles; and
— — day-to-day use with a child (e.g. securing, harnessing, adaption for a growing child)
is of utmost importance to ensure that a CRS is used properly in accordance with the manufacturer's
intentions, and to ensure that a correctly installed CRS will provide the best possible protection in a crash
situation. An international agreement on usability criteria and measurements is beneficial for both consumers
and manufacturers.
The aim of this document is to provide a usability evaluation system for ISOFIX systems to promote improved
ISOFIX design for easy and correct use.
It provides child restraint and vehicle manufacturers with a tool for the assessment of the usability of new and
current ISOFIX systems. At the same time, it provides consumers (parents and caregivers) with usability
information on the key features related to the proper use of the ISOFIX system and assists them in selecting
CRSs and vehicles with ISOFIX systems that are easier to use properly.
The ISO usability evaluation system has been developed with participation from, and considering the
experiences from, usability rating systems of Canada (Transport Canada and ICBC), USA (NHTSA, IIHS) and
the European Union (EU) (NPACS and consumer rating programmes, such as ICRT, ADAC).
v
DRAFT International Standard ISO/DIS 29061-1:2025(en)
Road vehicles — Methods and criteria for usability evaluation of child
restraint systems and their interface with vehicle anchorage systems
— —
Part 1:
Vehicles and child restraint systems equipped with ISOFIX anchorages
and attachments
1 Scope
This document provides criteria for judgement of usability of child restraint systems (CRSs) with ISOFIX
attachments and their corresponding anchorage systems in vehicles.
This document provides criteria for a separate evaluation of the CRS ISOFIX attachments, of the ISOFIX
anchorage installation in vehicles, and an evaluation of the interface issues when installing a CRS in a certain
vehicle.
This document covers both rigid and flexible attachments of the CRS to the vehicle ISOFIX anchorages.
NOTE 1 CRS includes enhanced child restraint system (ECRS) according to UN Regulation No. 129.
NOTE 2 Although ISOFIX is defined in the original "“ISOFIX"” standard (ISO 13216-1) to be a rigid system, the term
"“ISOFIX"” in this document is extended to include flexible CRS attachments (e.g. LATCH in USA, UAS in Canada).
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— — ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
— — IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1 3.1
anchorage
part of the universal interface provided in a vehicle
Note 1 to entry: See also ISOFIX anchorages (3.9.2(3.9.2),), top tether anchorage (3.17.1(3.17.1)) and lower tether
anchorage (3.13(3.13).).
3.2 3.2
anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict forward or rearward rotation of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
ISO/PRF 29061-1:2025(en)
3.2.1 3.2.1
primary anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict forward rotation of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
EXAMPLE Top tether (3.17(3.17)) or support leg (3.16(3.16).).
3.2.2 3.2.2
secondary anti-rotational device
device intended to restrict rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
EXAMPLE Rebound bar (3.11(3.11)) or lower tether (3.12(3.12).).
3.3 3.3
attachment
part of the universal interface provided with the child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
Note 1 to entry: See also ISOFIX attachments (3.9.3(3.9.3).).
3.4 3.4
audible
capable of being heard in normal environmental conditions
3.5 3.5
base
part of the child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) equipped with ISOFIX attachments (3.9.3(3.9.3)) which can
be attached to the ISOFIX anchorages (3.9.2(3.9.2)) separately from the CRS shell
Note 1 to entry: The CRS shell is attached on the CRS base in the normal use.
3.6 3.6
child restraint system
CRS
free-standing device intended to provide child vehicle occupants with an approved restraint
Note 1 to entry: CRSs comprise various categories such as car beds, infant-only restraints, toddler seats (forward or
rearward-facing), booster cushions, and booster seats. Combination products (multi modes CRS) cover two or more of
these product categories.
3.7 3.7
connector
connecting and locking device to the universal interface, provided with the child restraint system (CRS)
(3.6(3.6),), and part of the attachment (3.3(3.3))
3.8 3.8
slack
looseness of an adjustable strap that is likely to affect the performance of the child restraint system (CRS)
(3.6(3.6)) adversely
3.8.1 3.8.1
hidden slack
unintended looseness of an adjustable strap that is likely to affect the performance of the child restraint system
(CRS) (3.6(3.6)) adversely, and that cannot be easily detected
ISO/DISPRF 29061-1:2025(en)
3.9 3.9
ISOFIX
system for the connection of child restraint systems (CRSs) (3.6(3.6)) to vehicles, which has two rigid
anchorages (3.1(3.1)) in a vehicle seating position located near the seat bight (3.14(3.14),), corresponding
rigid attachments (3.3(3.3)) on the CRS, and a means to limit the pitch rotation of the CRS
Note 1 to entry: In this document, the term ISOFIX is extended to include flexible CRS attachments, e.g. LATCH (Lower
Anchorages and Tethers for CHildren) in USA and UAS (Universal Anchorage System) in Canada.
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-1:1999, 3.6, modified — Note 1 to entry has been added.]
3.9.1 3.9.1
ISOFIX accessibility tester
device used to check the accessibility of an ISOFIX anchorage (3.9.2(3.9.2))
Note 1 to entry: The dimensions are defined in ISO 13216-1:1999, Figure 3.
3.9.2 3.9.2
ISOFIX anchorage
one of two (2) prescribed 6 mm diameter round horizontal bars, in accordance with ISO 13216-1:1999,
provided at a vehicle seating position and extending from vehicle seat bight (3.14(3.14)) or seat structure to
accept and restrain a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) with prescribed attachments (3.3(3.3))
Note 1 to entry: Anchorages (3.1(3.1)) may be rigid or semi-rigid according to ISO 13216-1:1999, Annex A.
3.9.3 3.9.3
ISOFIX attachment
one of two (2) prescribed connections, in accordance with ISO 13216-1:1999, extending from the child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) structure, and compatible with an anchorage (3.1(3.1))
Note 1 to entry: Attachments (3.3(3.3)) may be rigid or non-rigid (flexible) according to ISO 13216-1:1999, Annex B.
3.10 3.10
pictogram
illustration or photo used to represent a concept or an operation
Note 1 to entry: A pictogram can be supplemented by text.
3.11 3.11
rebound bar
type of anti-rotational device (3.2(3.2)) intended to restrict the rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
Note 1 to entry: It usually comprises a rigid device that, when in its operational position, rests against the vehicle
seatback.
3.12 3.12
lower tether
type of anti-rotational device (3.2(3.2)) intended to restrict the rearward rotation of a rearward-facing child
restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6))
Note 1 to entry: It usually comprises a tether strap or other hardware attached near the back or base (3.5(3.5)) of the CRS
that connects to a lower tether anchorage (3.13(3.13).). It incorporates a device to enable it to be connected to such an
anchorage (3.1(3.1).).
ISO/PRF 29061-1:2025(en)
3.13 3.13
lower tether anchorage
anchorage (3.1(3.1)) on the vehicle seat track or on or close to the vehicle floor to which a lower tether
(3.12(3.12)) can be attached
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-4:2020, 3.1]
3.14 3.14
seat bight
area close to the intersection of the surfaces of the vehicle seat cushion and the seat back
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-1:1999, 3.8, modified — "“or squab"” was deleted from the end of the definition.]
3.15 3.15
single action
operation that can be completed without the need to undertake a secondary action
EXAMPLE This includes tightening a strap by pulling it without the need to release a locking system; or attaching to
an anchorage (3.1(3.1)) without the need to depress the seat cushion.
3.16 3.16
support leg
type of anti-rotational device (3.2(3.2)) comprising a permanent attachment (3.3(3.3)) to a child restraint
system (CRS) (3.6(3.6),), or a base (3.5(3.5)) of a CRS, creating a compressive load path between the CRS and a
vehicle structure (for example, the vehicle floor) to prevent or reduce forward rotation of the CRS
Note 1 to entry: A support leg can be adjustable.
3.17 3.17
top tether
tether strap (or equivalent) attached at or near the top of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6),),
incorporating a device to enable it to be connected to a top tether anchorage (3.17.1(3.17.1))
3.17.1 3.17.1
top tether anchorage
device, such as a ring, bar, bracket, or webbing loop, and its underlying structure, either user-ready or
aftermarket-installed, to which a top tether (3.17(3.17)) can be attached
3.17.2 3.17.2
top tether strap
webbing strap which extends from the top of a child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) to the top tether
anchorage (3.17.1(3.17.1)) and which is equipped with an adjustment device, a tension-relieving device and
a top tether (3.17(3.17) )connector (3.7(3.7))
[SOURCE: ISO 13216-2:2004, 3.3]
3.18 3.18
usability
extent to which a vehicle or child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) is capable of being used and is convenient
and practical in use (separately or combined)
3.19 3.19
visible
capable of being seen without tools (other than spectacles) in normal environmental conditions
ISO/DISPRF 29061-1:2025(en)
3.20 3.20
harness
child restraint system (CRS) (3.6(3.6)) belt assembly comprising shoulder restraints, a crotch strap and
optionally lap straps
4 ISOFIX usability evaluation procedure and scoring principles
4.1 Evaluation procedure
This document provides a procedure to evaluate the usability of ISOFIX attachments on CRSs, ISOFIX hardware
in vehicle seating positions, and the interface between ISOFIX systems for specific combinations of CRSs and
vehicle seating positions. The evaluation takes into consideration CRSs that are equipped with either flexible
or rigid ISOFIX attachments including those that include a top tether or other anti-rotation device(s). The
usability protocol is intended to be objective and repeatable.
The evaluation is most easily accomplished using a team of two people having basic knowledge of CRSs and
being familiar with the technical terms used. However, they should preferably be unfamiliar with the CRS
model to be evaluated.
The procedure for all three aspects of the process: the CRS, the vehicle seating position and the resulting
interface, takes about 45 min.
The necessary materials include:
— — the usability evaluation form (in either paper or electronic format),);
— — the vehicle owner’s instruction manual,;
— — the CRS instruction manual, including instruction video if applicable,; and
— — a screwdriver, or a simple prying/turning tool.
A copy of the terms and definitions from this document can also be helpful.
For the independent assessment of CRS ISOFIX connector function, the use of an ISOFIX bar dummy is
recommended. In its simplest form this can be a straight 6 mm bar of at least 280 mm length, it can consist of
two aligned ISOFIX anchorages connected to a rigid supporting material, or a demo seat equipped with ISOFIX
anchorages.
For the independent assessment of vehicle ISOFIX anchorages and the available space around them, the use
of an ISOFIX accessibility tester, or a standard ISOFIX connector is recommended, fulfilling the requirements
of ISO 13216-1:1999, Figure 3.
Initially, the CRS shall be in the condition as supplied to the consumer. The evaluation process includes all the
steps necessary, including assembly, to complete the installation.
Unpacking the CRS, removing the box, plastic protections, detaching the handbook, etc.,. shall be disregarded
in the evaluation, but other initial one-time preparations are considered and assessed in the forms.
The mode of use for the CRS (i.e. forward-facing/rearward-facing, upright/reclined, with base/without base)
and the seating position in the vehicle shall be determined in advance and documented in the evaluation form.
The evaluation process first addresses the labels and instructions, followed by the ease of installation and
removal of the CRS.
ISO/PRF 29061-1:2025(en)
4.2 Scoring system
The scoring system consists of a good/average/poor rating (scored with 3/1/0 points) of each item assessed,
and an importance rating A/B/C (scored with 3/2/1 points) for each item. For each assessment the scoring of
the above are multiplied. A maximum score for a "“good"” solution on an item with "“A"” importance is
9 points.
In this document, “average” means “mid-level” and shall not be perceived as a statistical average between good
and poor.
The maximum possible score will depend on the features and usage of the restraint and vehicle. Different
products can have different maximum possible scores and therefore comparisons of the raw number of total
points would not be appropriate. The final rating consists of a total number of points that shall be expressed
as a percentage of the maximum possible score for the particular conditions. See also further
recommendations given in Annex AAnnex A. Example. An example of usability rating classes is given in
Annex BAnnex B.
In addition, in some instances the rating will result in a total poor rating (or fail) if the product evaluated does
not score either a “good” or “average” in the most crucial questions of this rating. These instances are identified
in the evaluation sheets in the “notes” column against the relevant questions.
5 Usability evaluation forms
The following are the usability evaluation forms:
— — Form 1: ISOFIX child restraint system;
— — Form 2: Vehicle ISOFIX and top tether anchorages;
— — Form 3: Interface — Installing the CRS, or base with seat, in the vehicle.
To enhance the value and applicability of this document, the forms are also provided in a revisable [MS
1 1)
Excel ] ] format. These forms are provided at the following URL: https://standards.iso.org/iso/29061/-1/ed-
2/en/.
MS Excel is an example of a suitable product available commercially. This information is given for the convenience of
users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by ISO of this product.
1)
MS Excel is an example of a suitable product available commercially. This information is given for the convenience of
users of this document and does not constitute an endorsement by ISO of this product.
ISO/DIS 29061-1:2025(en)
Form 1: ISOFIX child restraint system
For the independent assessment of CRS ISOFIX connector function, the use of an ISOFIX bar dummy is recommended (see 4.14.1).).
Date of evaluation Evaluated by Test no.
☐ Rigid attachments ☐ Flexible attachments ☐ Top tether ☐ Support leg ☐ Secondary anti-rotational device
Child restraint ISOFIX system
Manufacturer
a a
Child seat make/brand and model Base make/brand and model model
Country/region of use Country/region of use
b b
Certification/type approval no. Certification/type approval no.
Production no. (serial no./SAI no., etc.) Production no. (serial no./SAI no., etc.)
Date of manufacturing (yyyy-mm-dd) Date of manufacturing (yyyy-mm-dd)
☐ Forward-facing ☐ Rearward-facing
Mode tested
Type (infant, group 0, integral, A2, etc.) CRS inclination tested ☐ Upright/normal ☐ Reclined
Appropriate child size range for this
mode according to instruction
manual Mass range (kg): Height range (cm): Age range (months or years):
a If applicable.
b Where applicable.
ISO/DIS 29061-1:2025(en)
a
Form 1.1: CRS ISOFIX instructions and labels
N/
Good Average Poor Importance Notes
A
Do CRS or base Visually obvious, able to Pictures plus written Only written
instructions clearly show use with pictures only. instructions provided. instructions provided or
how to prepare and Labels on CRS self- Labels on CRS non self- non self-explanatory
use/attach the ISOFIX explanatory, or not explanatory, or viewable pictures, or nothing
1.1.1
attachments? necessary. from one direction only. shown.
Labels on CRS ☐ ☐ ☐ A ☐
Instruc
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...