ISO/IEC 20006-1:2014
(Main)Information technology for learning, education and training — Information model for competency — Part 1: Competency general framework and information model
Information technology for learning, education and training — Information model for competency — Part 1: Competency general framework and information model
ISO/IEC 20006-1:2014 provides: a general framework for dealing with competency information in information technology for learning, education, and training (ITLET) contexts; a system architecture for managing and exchanging competency information and its related objects; an information model for expressing competency and its related objects that includes an introduction to the composition of competency; use cases used to support the development of the general framework and competency information model. ISO/IEC 20006-1:2014 is for those who design and use learning systems and human resources systems to support management and exchange of competency information using ITLET systems. ISO/IEC 20006-1:2014 is related to the Conceptual Reference Model developed in ISO/IEC TR 24763. Information regarding the relationships between the ISO/IEC 20006 and ISO/IEC TR 24763 is provided.
Technologies de l'information pour l'apprentissage, l'éducation et la formation — Modèle d'information pour les compétences — Partie 1: Cadre général des compétences et modèle d'information
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC DIS 20006-1
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Secretariat: ANSI
Voting begins on Voting terminates on
2013-05-17 2013-08-17
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION • МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ПО СТАНДАРТИЗАЦИИ • ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION • МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ЭЛЕКТРОТЕХНИЧЕСКАЯ КОММИСИЯ • COMMISSION ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE INTERNATIONALE
Information Technology for Learning, Education and Training —
Information Model for Competency —
Part 1:
Competency General Framework and Information Model
ICS 03.100.30; 35.240.99
To expedite distribution, this document is circulated as received from the committee
secretariat. ISO Central Secretariat work of editing and text composition will be undertaken at
publication stage.
Pour accélérer la distribution, le présent document est distribué tel qu'il est parvenu du
secrétariat du comité. Le travail de rédaction et de composition de texte sera effectué au
Secrétariat central de l'ISO au stade de publication.
THIS DOCUMENT IS A DRAFT CIRCULATED FOR COMMENT AND APPROVAL. IT IS THEREFORE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AND MAY NOT BE
REFERRED TO AS AN INTERNATIONAL STANDARD UNTIL PUBLISHED AS SUCH.
PURPOSES,
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNOLOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL TO BECOME
STANDARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN NATIONAL REGULATIONS.
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH
THEY ARE AWARE AND TO PROVIDE SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION.
International Organization for Standardization, 2013
©
International Electrotechnical Commission, 2013
ISO/IEC DIS 20006-1
© ISO/IEC 2013
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any
means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission.
Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/IEC 2013 — All rights reserved
ISO/IEC FCD 20006-1
37 Contents Page
38 Foreword . v
39 Introduction . vi
40 1 Scope . 9
41 1.1 General . 9
42 1.2 Exclusions . 2
43 1.3 Areas not addressed . 2
44 2 Conformance . 2
45 3 Normative references . 2
46 4 Terms and definitions. 3
47 5 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 6
48 6 Competency general frameworks . 7
49 6.1 Introduction . 7
50 6.2 Information architecture basic integrated competency information . 8
51 6.3 Competency organization . 11
52 6.4 Elements of competency and association with ISO/IEC TR 24763 . 12
53 6.5 Semantic elements in competency expressions . 13
54 7 Competency Semantic Information . 14
55 7.1 Architecture of competency information . 14
56 7.2 Competency semantic information model . 15
57 7.3 Types of Competency Semantic information – Competency Meaning Information . 17
58 7.3.1 Introduction . 17
59 7.3.2 Essential units . 17
60 7.3.3 Scenario units . 18
61 7.4 Types of Competency Semantic Information - Competency Situation Information . 25
62 7.4.1 Introduction . 25
63 7.4.2 Situation element unit . 25
64 Annex A (informative) Relevant linkages and relationships between ISO/IEC 20006 and ISO/IEC
65 TR 24763 . 29
66 Annex B (informative) Previous use case on Japanese National Skills Standard (ETSS) . 37
67 B.1 General . 37
68 B.2 Development of semantics information model on ETSS as previous case. 37
69 Annex C (informative) Application to Japanese National Skills Standard (ITSS) . 38
70 C.1 General . 38
71 C.2 Application of semantics information model to project quality management skill in ITSS . 38
72 Annex D (informative) Application to Canadian Learning Management System Desire2Learn . 40
73 D.1 General . 40
74 D.2 Application of semantics information model to project quality management skill in ITSS . 44
75 Annex E (informative) Application to Canadian National Occupational Classification (NOC) . 46
76 E.1 General . 46
77 E.2 Application of semantics information model to project quality management skill in ITSS . 46
78 Bibliography . 49
iv © ISO/IEC 2013 – All rights reserved© ISO/IEC 2013 – All rights reserved
ISO/IEC FCD 20006-1
80 Foreword
81 ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
82 Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are members of
83 ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical committees
84 established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity. ISO and IEC
85 technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations, governmental
86 and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the work. In the field of information
87 technology, ISO and IEC have established a joint technical committee, ISO/IEC JTC 1.
88 International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
89 The main task of the joint technical committee is to prepare International Standards. Draft International
90 Standards adopted by the joint technical committee are circulated to national bodies for voting. Publication as
91 an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the national bodies casting a vote.
92 Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
93 rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
94 ISO/IEC 20006-1 was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Joint Technical Committee,
95 Subcommittee SC 36, Information Technology for Learning, Education and Training.
96 ISO/IEC 20006 consists of the following parts, under the general title Information Technology for Learning,
97 Education and Training — Information Model for Competency:
98 Part 1: Competency General Framework and Information Model
99 Part 2: Proficiency Level Information Model
100 Part 3: Guidelines for Aggregation of Competency Information and Data
© ISO/IEC 2013 – All rights reserved © ISO/IEC 2013 – All v
rights reserved
ISO/IEC FCD 20006-1
101 Introduction
102 [Project Co-editors Note: The new text provided below is intended to address UK and the AU
103 comments that requested a simple statement that would explain how this standard will support
104 development of better ITLET systems, how this work relates to existing specifications such as
105 RDCEO, and to identify the interoperability challenges encountered. As an alternative the previous
106 updated text has also been provided. NBs are asked to vote as to which text they prefer and to
107 provide suggestions for improvement.]
108 New Text:
109 Organizations, such as schools, universities, institutes, governments, and companies, use different ITLET
110 systems to support the management and exchange of competency information. To meet their mission and
111 goals, such organizations may rely on Human Resource Information Systems (HRISs), Learning
112 Management Systems (LMSs), assessment systems, and other types of IT systems to communicate and
113 store competency-related information. These IT systems are often quite diverse, employ one or more
114 different approaches and may be standalone or integrated in combination with other IT systems. They
115 may be
116 developed in-house,
117 provided through ITLET providers and suppliers,
118 adapted from open source products, or
119 other.
120 Due to lack of interoperability, some typical problems encountered by stakeholders as well as with ITLET
121 systems dedicated to the management and exchange of competency information include use of
122 different competency schema;
123 diverse information architectures and software that is not compatible;
124 dissimilar information models and approaches; and,
125 other.
127 Initial observations suggest that much work remains to be done in order to
129 Accommodate complicated competencies;
130 Link competencies adequately;
131 Support comparisons of competency information and data between different communities;
132 Track and scaffold the knowledge state of the learner;
133 Other.
134 If there are interoperability issues then these issues may be encountered as noted in the examples below
135 (Hirata & Brown, 2008):
136 Example 1: Technical - Competency and associated information cannot always be selected and shared
137 between different ITLET systems (e.g., learning management, HR, and other related platforms);
139 Example 2: Organizational - Competency and associated information is not easily used in human
140 development activities, because skills and competency information may be detailed or expressed
141 differently in various ITLET systems (e.g., learning management, HR, national occupational classification,
142 and other related systems);
144 Example 3: Information exchange - Skills and competency proficiency information, such as individual
145 status or degrees acquired, cannot be shared easily amongst different ITLET systems (e.g., HR, learning
146 management, national occupational classification, and other related systems);
148 Example 4: Individual learner - Individual developmental learning, education, and training paths cannot
149 easily migrate or be exchanged amongst ITLET systems;
vi © ISO/IEC 2013 – All rights reserved© ISO/IEC 2013 – All rights reserved
ISO/IEC FCD 20006-1
151 Example 5: Systems perspective (where systems include individuals, organizations, and the
152 technologies that support them) - Individuals and organizations cannot easily design and integrate
153 informal and formal learning, education, and training opportunities to support life goals, career strategies,
154 and career paths using existing common dimensions within ITLET systems;
156 Example 6: Practical analytics - The ability to access, extract, and analyze competency and associated
157 information can provide evidence as to whether learning, education and training information needs are
158 being met in order to analyze lifelong learning, thus where competency information must
...
INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC
STANDARD 20006-1
First edition
2014-07-01
Information technology for learning,
education and training — Information
model for competency —
Part 1:
Competency general framework and
information model
Technologies de l’information pour l’apprentissage, l’éducation et la
formation — Modèle d’information pour les compétences —
Partie 1: Cadre général des compétences et modèle d’information
Reference number
©
ISO/IEC 2014
© ISO/IEC 2014
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/IEC 2014 – All rights reserved
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
1.1 General . 1
1.2 Exclusions . 2
1.3 Areas not addressed . 2
2 Conformance . 2
3 Normative references . 3
4 Terms and definitions . 3
5 Symbols and abbreviated terms . 5
6 Competency general framework . 6
6.1 Introduction . 6
6.2 Information architecture view to support the management and exchange of
competency information . 7
6.3 Competency organization . 9
6.4 Elements of competency . 9
6.5 Semantic elements in competency expressions .10
7 Competency Semantic Information .11
7.1 Architecture of competency information .11
7.2 Competency semantic information model .12
7.3 Types of Competency Semantic information - Competency Meaning Information .15
7.4 Types of Competency Semantic Information - Competency Situation Information .20
Annex A (informative) Cases and relationships between ISO/IEC 20006 and ISO/IEC TR 24763 .23
Annex B (informative) Examples for competency information architectures .26
Annex C (informative) Patterns of competency organization by HRMLs .29
Annex D (informative) Previous use case on Japanese National Skills Standard (ETSS) .31
Annex E (informative) Application to Japanese National Skills Standard (ITSS)
................................................32
Annex F (informative) Application to Canadian Learning Management System Desire2Learn .34
Annex G (informative) Application to Canadian National Occupational Classification
(NOC) and Canadian Nurses Association Canadian Nurse Practitioner Core
Competency Framework.40
Bibliography .43
© ISO/IEC 2014 – All rights reserved iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are
members of ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical
committees established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical
activity. ISO and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the
work. In the field of information technology, ISO and IEC have established a joint technical committee,
ISO/IEC JTC 1.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for
the different types of document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject
of patent rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction
and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity
assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical Barriers
to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary information
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology, Subcommittee
SC 36, Information technology for learning, education and training.
ISO/IEC 20006 consists of the following parts, under the general title Information technology for learning,
education and training — Information model for competency:
— Part 1: Competency general framework and information model
— Part 2: Proficiency level information model
— Part 3: Guidelines for aggregation of competency information and data
iv © ISO/IEC 2014 – All rights reserved
Introduction
From the late 1990s, some industrial and academic organizations have developed information technology
standards in the skills and competency domain, such as human resources, on a global level to address
the interoperability requirements and environmental complexities of management and sharing of
competency information amongst different organizations. Some examples include work spearheaded by
the following organizations: the IMS Global Learning Consortium Inc., HR-XML Consortium, IEEE-LTSC,
OMG, CEN TC353 and also ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 36 itself. Some typical problems encountered by stakeholders
as well as ITLET systems dedicated to the management and exchange of competency information and
[2]
where these issues may be encountered are provided in examples below:
Example 1: Technical - Competency and associated information cannot always be selected and shared
between different ITLET systems (e.g. learning management, HR, and other related platforms);
Example 2: Organizational - Competency and associated information is not easily used in human
development activities, because skills and competency information may be detailed or expressed
differently in various ITLET systems (e.g. learning management, HR, national occupational classification,
and other related systems);
Example 3: Information exchange - Skills and competency proficiency information, such as individual
status or degrees acquired, cannot be shared easily amongst different ITLET systems (e.g. HR, learning
management, national occupational classification, and other related systems);
Example 4: Individual learner - Individual developmental learning, education, and training paths
cannot easily migrate or be exchanged amongst ITLET systems;
Example 5: Systems perspective (where systems include individuals, organizations, and the
technologies that support them) - Individuals and organizations cannot easily design and integrate
informal and formal learning, education, and training opportunities to support life goals, career
strategies, and career paths using existing common dimensions within ITLET systems;
Example 6: Practical analytics - The ability to access, extract, and analyse competency and associated
information can provide evidence as to whether learning, education and training information needs
are being met in order to analyse lifelong learning, thus where competency information must be drawn
from different systems and where non-interoperable format and definitions are used;
Example 7: Assessment and evaluation - ITLET systems (e.g. acknowledgement and consideration
are needed regarding evaluation biases in human assessment, the use of varying methods and metrics
to evaluate human performance, and the need to conduct accurate skill gap analysis), where ITLET
systems that use different competency digital schema are involved; and,
Example 8: Overarching goals and outcomes - Human assessment and support for the development of
human potential requires ITLET systems that provide a more flexible, holistic integration and exchange of
competency and associated information beyond individual learning opportunities, everyday operation,
and work performance. Competency data must be generated.
Some of these identified problems have been addressed on a limited basis by the standards and
specifications produced by the organizations mentioned above. Not only is it difficult to use these
standards and specifications, however, but also the unsolved problems are still critical. It is still confusing
for stakeholders to implement and use these standards and specifications. Also, various problems
associated with ITLET related systems, which should be solved by or supported with information
technology, still remain.
Currently, organizations, such as schools, universities, institutes, and companies, use different ITLET
systems to support the use of learning content, to enable and enhance various learning activities, and
to provide other services. To meet their mission and goals, such organizations may rely on in-house
developers, others such as ITLET vendors or suppliers, or a combination of both to provide and operate
IT systems to support LET. This means ITLET operations and other organizational systems that deal
with skills and competency information, such as interrelated human resources (HR) information
© ISO/IEC 2014 – All rights reserved v
systems, need to be interoperable to allow for communication between organizations, their employees,
and outsourcing ITLET providers or suppliers.
The purpose of this multi-part International Standard is to provide a framework, models, system
architecture used for competency and proficiency information, and a way to aggregate competency
information. This standard will provide a general framework and information model to manage and
exchange information about knowledge, skills, ability, attitude, and educational objectives. Especially
this International Standard will focus on extending the concepts contained within ISO/IEC TR 24763 by
providing more detailed information regarding competency information and its information aggregation.
This multi-part standard may be used by software developers and implementers, instructional designers
and test designers, and others to ensure that learning, education and training environments satisfy
learners’ and organizations’ competency needs. In addition, this International Standard will provide
definitions of several types of competency information aggregation, which will p
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.