Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); File Transfer, Access and Management (FTAM) over ISDN based on simple file transfer profile

DE/TE-01042-2

Digitalno omrežje z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN) – Dostop do datotek in upravljanje njihovega prenosa (FTAM) prek sistema ISDN na podlagi enostavnega profila za prenos datotek

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
15-Feb-1995
Current Stage
12 - Completion
Due Date
28-Nov-1994
Completion Date
16-Feb-1995
Mandate
Standard
ETS 300 388 E1:2003
English language
29 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2003
Digitalno omrežje z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN) – Dostop do datotek in
upravljanje njihovega prenosa (FTAM) prek sistema ISDN na podlagi enostavnega
profila za prenos datotek
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); File Transfer, Access and Management
(FTAM) over ISDN based on simple file transfer profile
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ETS 300 388 Edition 1
ICS:
33.080 Digitalno omrežje z Integrated Services Digital
integriranimi storitvami Network (ISDN)
(ISDN)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN ETS 300 388
TELECOMMUNICATION February 1995
STANDARD
Source: ETSI TC-TE Reference: DE/TE-01042-2
ICS: 33.080
ISDN, FTAM
Key words:
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN);
File Transfer Access & Management (FTAM) over ISDN
based on simple file transfer profile
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Postal address:
650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
Office address:
c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - secretariat@etsi.fr
X.400: Internet:
Tel.: +33 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1995. All rights reserved.
New presentation - see History box

Page 2
ETS 300 388: February 1995
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.

Page 3
ETS 300 388: February 1995
Contents
Foreword .5
1 Scope .7
2 Normative references.8
3 Definitions and abbreviations .9
3.1 Definitions .9
3.2 Abbreviations .10
4 General.10
5 Conformance.11
5.1 Conformance statement .11
6 FTAM Services.11
6.1 Classes of service.11
6.2 Functional units.11
6.3 Document types (or file types) supported .12
6.4 Attributes.12
6.5 Protocol.12
6.5.1 Capability to parse, as a minimum, application data records of 7K octets.12
6.5.2 Out of scope settings.12
6.6 Details of FTAM internal service.13
6.6.1 File transparency.13
7 Use of directory including the X.500 Directory .13
8 Logging.14
9 Delta to the ISPICS from EN 30607, Part 3 .14
10 ACSE, Presentation and Session Profile for FTAM over ISDN.16
10.1 Association Control Service Element (ACSE) .16
10.2 Presentation layer and Transfer syntax .16
10.2.1 General.16
10.2.2 Context management.16
10.2.3 Context restoration.16
10.2.4 Document translation .16
10.3 Session Layer .16
10.3.1 Session version 2 - unlimited user data .16
10.3.2 Extended concatenation.16
10.3.3 Session segmenting.16
10.3.4 Minor Synchronise.16
10.3.5 Resynchronise.17
11 Lower layers application rules .17
11.1 General .17
11.2 Application rules for lower layer protocols based on ETS 300 080 for "FTAM simple file
transfer over ISDN".17
11.2.1 Scope (clause 1) .17
11.2.2 Model description (clause 4) .17
11.2.2.1 Protocol pillars (subclause 4.1) .17
11.2.2.2 Co-ordination between B-Channel and D-Channel
(subclause 4.2) .17

Page 4
ETS 300 388: February 1995
11.2.2.3 Mapping of ETS 300 102-1 causes to OSI CONS reasons
(subclause 4.3) . 17
11.2.3 Layer 1 protocols (clause 5) . 17
11.2.4 D-channel layer 2 (clause 6). 17
11.2.5 D-channel layer 3 (clause 7). 17
11.2.5.1 The access protocol (subclause 7.1) . 17
11.2.5.2 Terminal selection and compatibility checking (subclause
7.2). 18
11.2.5.3 Service specific use of supplementary services
(subclause 7.3) . 18
11.2.6 B-channel protocols (clause 8) . 18
11.2.6.1 B-channel layer 2 (subclause 8.1). 18
11.2.6.1.1 Base protocols (subclause 8.1.1). 18
11.2.6.1.2 General rules for base protocol CCITT Recommendation
X.75 (subclause 8.1.2) . 18
11.2.6.1.3 Specific rules for base protocol CCITT Recommendation
X.75 (subclause 8.1.3) . 18
11.2.6.1.4 Application rules for base protocol ISO 7776 (subclause
8.1.4). 19
11.2.6.1.5 Synchronization (subclause 8.1.5) . 19
11.2.6.2 B-channel layer 3 (subclause 8.2). 19
11.2.6.2.1 Logical channels to be used (subclause 8.2.2). 19
11.2.6.2.2 Packet sizes (subclause 8.2.3) & Default packet level
window size (subclause 8.2.4) . 19
11.2.6.2.3 Protocol Identifier (subclause 8.2.8) . 19
11.2.6.2.4 Interrupt packet (subclause 8.2.9) . 20
11.2.6.2.5 Encoding of Network Service Access Point (NSAP)
addresses (subclause 8.2.11). 20
11.2.6.2.6 Optional user facilities and CCITT specified DTE facilities
(subclause 8.2.12) . 20
12 Transport profile based on ETS 300 080. 20
12.1 Addressing . 20
12.2 Quality of Service . 20
12.3 Transport protocol Classes . 21
12.4 Re-use of Transport connection. 21
12.5 Guideline for ISDN call set-up. 21
12.6 Transport expedited . 21
12.7 Security . 21
12.8 Detailed Application rules for ETS 300 080, clause 9 . 21
12.8.1 Additional application rules for the transport protocol in ITU-T
Recommendation T.70 (layer 4) (subclause 9.1) . 21
12.8.2 Specification of the additional application rules for the transport protocol in
ISO/IEC 8073 and ITU-T Recommendation X.224 (layer 4) (subclause
9.2). 21
Annex A (normative): ETSI - FTAM Profile Implementation Conformance Statement Requirements
List . 22
Annex B (informative): Recommended combinations of parameter values to ensure optimum
throughput. 26
Annex C (informative): Bibliography . 27
History. 29

Page 5
ETS 300 388: February 1995
Foreword
This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) was produced by the Terminal Equipment (TE)
Technical Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
Proposed transposition dates
Date of latest announcement of this ETS (doa): 31 May 1995
Date of latest publication of new National Standard
or endorsement of this ETS (dop/e): 30 November 1995
Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 30 November 1995

Page 6
ETS 300 388: February 1995
Blank page
Page 7
ETS 300 388: February 1995
1 Scope
This ETS specifies simple file transfer as a teleservice over the Integrated Services Digital Network
(ISDN) using File Transfer Access and Management (FTAM - EN 30607 Parts 1 to 6 [5] (incorporating the
corrigenda) and ISO/IEC 8571, Parts 1 to 5 [6]).
A basic ETS, fully compatible with the Simple File Transfer ETS as described in ISO/IEC ISP 10607 Parts
1 to 3 [1], [2], [3] & [4], the equivalent European Norm, EN 30607 [5], and in ISO TR 10000-2 is described.
Conditional extensions which cover additional ETSI requirements are also specified. An implementation
claiming full conformance to this teleservice is to support all of these conditional extensions. Basic and full
implementations may interwork, as the extensions can be negotiated out in the initialization phase. The
specification of the mapping between ISO Session Service and a Transport Service running over ISDN is
based on ETS 300 080 [13].
This ETS is presented in a number of clauses. Clauses 6 to 9 specify the FTAM specific part of the ETS
and is based on "Simple File Transfer", EN 30607, Part 3 [5]. It could become the first of a family of ETSs
for the use of FTAM over ISDN, with additional, more powerful ETSs based on ISO/IEC ISP 10607, Parts
4 to 6.
Clause 10 gives the "Specification of the ACSE, Presentation and the Session protocols for the use by
FTAM", and notes the additional constraints to EN 30607, Part 1 [5].
Clauses 11 and 12 give lower layer application rules for the Transport Service to be used based on ETS
300 080 [13]. Again it notes the additional constraints in this ETS for the support of the teleservice "File
Transfer Access and Management (FTAM) over ISDN, based on simple file transfer".
The ETS also contains three annexes. Annex A (normative) is a delta ETS Implementation Conformance
Statement Requirements List for FTAM, based on annex A of EN 30607-3 [5], the second (annex B
(informative)) is a set of recommendations on parameter combinations through the lower four layers to
achieve optimum throughput and the third (annex C (informative)), provides a bibliography of non-
normative references given in this ETS.
The ETS is, therefore, structured as follows:
Clause(s) Title
6 - 9 FTAM (this part plus the PICS);
10 ACSE, Presentation and Session;
11 - 12 Lower layers and Transport based on ETS 300 080 [13];
annexes A+B ISPICS for the FTAM specific part and lower layer parameters.
The FTAM part of the ETS is based on (and conformant to) EN 30607-3 [5] which has additional
European specific text preceding the ISO ISP text. It also, however, references ISO/IEC ISP 10607-3 [4]
for international completeness. It is also aligned with the recommendations in the CEC European
Procurement Handbook for Open Systems (EPHOS). For example, EPHOS defines that for a general
purpose system for terminal-to-terminal or to host, all four possible roles (initiator and responder, sender
and receiver) are implemented as is needed for a system claiming full conformance to the teleservice.
Basic conformance to the teleservice can be claimed for specialized systems as identified in subclause
6.1.
Additional restrictions are defined for the specific ISDN environment and these are clearly identified in
clause 9.
Some of the European Workshop for Open Systems (EWOS) conformance Abstract Test Suites (ATS)
will be selected and can be applied to the teleservice FTAM Simple File Transfer over ISDN with a few
changes and additions. This is used with ISDN specific additions for the Transport mapping.

Page 8
ETS 300 388: February 1995
2 Normative references
This ETS incorporates by dated or undated reference, provision from other publications. These normative
references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed hereafter. For
dated references, subsequent amendments to or revision of any of these publications apply to this ETS
only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the
publication referred to applies.
[1] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-1 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles AFTnn -File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 1:
Specification of ACSE, Presentation and Session Protocols for the use by
FTAM" (corrected and reprinted 1991-12-15).
[2] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles AFTnn - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 2:
Definition of document types, constraint sets and syntaxes" (corrected and
reprinted 1991-12-15).
[3] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2(a), Amendment 1 (1991): "Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC ISP
10607-2:1990, Additional Definitions".
[4] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-3 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles AFTnn - File Transfer, Access and Management -Part 3:
AFT11 Simple File Transfer Service (unstructured)" (corrected and reprinted
1991-12-15).
[5] EN 30607, Parts 1 to 6 (1993): "Textually identical to ISO/IEC ISP 10607 with
European specific character set foreword".
[6] ISO/IEC 8571 (1988): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - File Transfer, Access and Management -
Part 1 - General introduction,
Part 2 - Virtual Filestore definition,
Part 3 - File Service Definition,
Part 4 - File Protocol specification,
Part 5 - Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement Proforma".
[7] ISO/IEC 8571, Parts 1 to 5 (1992): "Information Processing Systems - Open
Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access and Management, Amendment
1 to Parts 1 to 5: Filestore Management".
[8] Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 8571-1:1988 (1991): "Information
Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access
and Management - Part 1: General introduction".
[9] Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 8571-2:1988 (1991): "Information
Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access
and Management - Part 2: Virtual Filestore Definition".
[10] Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 8571-3:1988 (1991): "Information
Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access
and Management - Part 3: File Service Definition".
[11] Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 8571-4:1988 (1991): "Information
Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access
and Management - Part 4: File Protocol specification".

Page 9
ETS 300 388: February 1995
[12] Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 8571-5:1988 (1991): "Information
Processing Systems - Open Systems Interconnection - File Transfer, Access
and Management - Part 5: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
Proforma".
[13] ETS 300 080 (1992): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); ISDN lower
layer protocols for telematic terminals".
[14] ISO 8327 (X.225) (1987): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Basic connection oriented session protocol specification (and
Addendum 2)".
[15] ISO/IEC 8073 (X.224) (1992): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Protocol for providing the connection - mode transport
service".
[16] ISO/IEC 8208: "Information technology- Data communications - X.25 Packet
Layer Protocol for Data Terminal Equipment".
[17] CCITT Recommendation X.223 (1988): "Use of X.25 to provide the OSI
connection-mode network service for CCITT applications".
[18] ENV 41112 (T/1112): "Provision of OSI Connection-Mode Transport Service
over the OSI Connection-mode Network Service by using an ISDN Circuit-mode
64 Kbits Unrestricted Bearer Service: Demand Case".
[19] ISO 7776 (1986): "Information processing systems - Data communications -
High level procedures - Description of the X.25 LAPB - compatible DTE data link
procedures".
[20] CCITT Recommendation X.75 (1984): "Packet switched signalling system
between public networks providing data transmission services".
[21] CCITT Recommendation T.90 (1988): "Characteristics and protocols for
terminals for telematic services in ISDN".
[22] prETS 300 410: "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); File Transfer and
Access Management (FTAM) teleservice, Service description".
[23] ITU-T Recommendation I.333 (1992): "Terminal selection in ISDN".
[24] prETS 300 403-1: "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Digital
Subscriber Signalling System No. one (DSS1) - User-network interface layer 3
specification for basic call control - Part 1: Protocol specification - [ITU-T
Recommendation Q.931 (1993), modified]".
3 Definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this ETS, the terms used in EN 30607-3 [5], ISO 8571 [6] and ISO 7498 are used with
the same meaning. The abbreviations used in the Profile Implementation Conformance Statement
Requirements List are duplicated for convenience.

Page 10
ETS 300 388: February 1995
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this ETS, the following abbreviations apply:
ACSE Association Control Service Element
AFT Application File Transfer profile
ATS Abstract Test Suite
DISP Draft International Standardized Profile
CEC Commission of the European Communities
EN European Norm
EPHOS European Procurement Handbook for Open Systems
ETS European Telecommunication Standard
ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute
EWOS European Workshop for Open Systems
FTAM File Transfer Access and Management
HLC Higher Layer Compatibility information element
IEC International Electrotechnical Committee
ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
ISO International Organisation for Standardization
ISP International Standardized Profile
ISPICS ISP Implementation Conformance Statement
MLS Maximum Level of Security or Multi Level Security system
NSAP Network Service Access Point
ODA Office Document Architecture
ODIF Office Document Interchange Format
PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
PDU Protocol Data Unit
PSPDN Packet Switched Public Data Network
SABM Set Asynchronous Balanced Mode
SNPA Sub-Network Point of Attachment
SPDU Session Protocol Data Unit
TSAP Transport Service Access Point
TSAP-Id TSAP Identifier
VT Virtual Terminal
Support level for protocol features
m supported (mandatory)
o optionally supported
c conditionally supported
x excluded
i outside the scope
- not applicable
Support level for attributes
f full
p partial
4 General
For the purposes of this ETS, the following terminology shall apply:
Support level: for Protocol Data Units (PDUs), parameters and other features:
'm' = Supported. Mandatory support as defined in EN 30607-3 [5].
'o' = Optionally supported, as defined in EN 30607-3 [5].
'c' = Conditionally supported (optional for a basic implementation but mandatory for an
implementation claiming full conformance).
'x' = eXcluded as defined in EN 30607-3 [5].

Page 11
ETS 300 388: February 1995
'i' = outside the scope as defined in EN 30607-3 [5], and ignored for conformance
testing.
'-' = not applicable as defined in EN 30607-3 [5].
For attributes:
'f' = full support of the attribute is required, as defined in ISO/IEC 8571-2 [6].
'p' = partial support of the attribute is permitted, as defined in ISO/IEC 8571-2 [6].
5 Conformance
This ETS states requirements upon implementations to achieve FTAM simple file transfer teleservice
terminal interworking. A claim of conformance to this ETS requires that all requirements in the relevant
base standards are satisfied, and that all the requirements in the following clauses are satisfied. Clauses 9
to 12 state the relationship between these requirements and those of the base standards.
5.1 Conformance statement
For each implementation claiming conformance to this ETS, an appropriate set of PICS shall be made
available stating support or non-support of each option identified in this ETS. In addition, for an
implementation claiming basic conformance, the status of each conditional option which has not been
implemented shall be explained. An implementation claiming full conformance shall support all conditional
options.
6 FTAM Services
6.1 Classes of service
The most widely implemented Service class is the File Transfer and Management class (no file access).
This is the preferred class (as restricted in Simple File Transfer, EN 30607-3 [5]) and is the basis for the
rest of the detailed recommendations. The File Transfer Class shall also be implemented with the Limited
File Management functional unit as mandatory. All future references are to EN 30607-3 [5] which is
textually identical to ISO/IEC ISP 10607-3 [4] with the addition of a European foreword.
EN 30607 [5] allows optionality in the roles of initiator and responder, and in the ability to send or receive
files. The main requirement is for symmetric PC-to-PC and this also requires all four roles to be available.
Specialised systems, for example, file or print servers need only ever act as a Responder. Conversely,
specialised simple terminals accessing a server or a host need only ever act as an Initiator. These basic
styles of usage are common and considerably simplify implementation. In support of such usage this ETS
distinguishes between the full conformance of general purpose systems and basic conformance of
specialized systems being capable of interworking with general purpose systems.
6.2 Functional units
For the full requirements of terminal access, the Limited File Management functional unit (the ability to
read attributes such as file size, Create files and Delete files) shall be mandatory.
The Enhanced File Management functional unit (the ability to change attributes) is optional in the basic
service but mandatory in the full service. It allows the user to modify attributes of selected files such as
rename a file. This is required for an implementation claiming full conformance. However, it can also allow
the ability to change the Access control security attributes. This is not considered to be safe. Therefore,
the Security Group of Attributes should not be negotiated in conjunction with this functional unit.
FTAM allows automatic Recovery from a network failure, or even an end system or terminal system
failure. The Restart (warm recovery) and Recover (cold recover) functional units are, therefore, highly
desirable for general purpose systems and Recovery shall be mandatory for full automatic mode.

Page 12
ETS 300 388: February 1995
6.3 Document types (or file types) supported
The support of the Document types FTAM-1 (unstructured text file) and FTAM-3 (unstructured binary)
shall be mandatory as specified in EN 30607-3 [5].
The Document type (file type) NBS-9, which is the definition of a Directory file, shall be mandatory in this
ETS for implementations claiming full conformance. This is to allow the ability to List Directory. The use of
this is defined in EN 30607-3 [5], clause 6.
The FTAM 2 document type (sequential or record oriented text) is optional but should be used (strongly
recommended) as it is useful for word processing and other common applications and widely
implemented. FTAM 4 (sequential binary) is outside the scope of this ETS.
INTAP-1, the Japanese document type for very large binary record files (image processing for example),
is optional in EN 30607-3 [5]. It is not useful in a terminal-to-terminal environment and is, therefore,
outside the scope of this ETS. Presentation abstract syntax for INTAP Document Type is, therefore, also
outside the scope of this ETS.
In this environment, only a simple Presentation service shall be required. The ability to perform context
management ( P-Alter-Context ) shall not be necessary. All required file/document types to be used on
this session shall be negotiated at connection time. This is sufficient for normal terminal use. This is
reflected in the Presentation Service requirements.
6.4 Attributes
The Storage group of attributes is still optional for the basic service but strongly recommended. In addition
to the requirements of EN 30607-3 [5], it shall be mandatory for implementations claiming full
conformance.
The security group of attributes are optional for the Responder. Given the problems with the ability to
change security attributes described earlier. This group should not be used in conjunction with the
Enhanced File Management functional unit.
NOTE: Improvement to this is the subject of a work item in ISO. In the interim, the Security
Attribute Group should not be selected in secure environments.
FTAM defines an access control attribute which allows authentication and access control security
checking on the basis of a Password, the user Identity and his location (Application Entity Title).
6.5 Protocol
For reasons of efficiency, implementations should optionally make use of the draft prEN 11188-3
"Common upper layer requirements - Minimal OSI upper layers requirements".
6.5.1 Capability to parse, as a minimum, application data records of 7K octets
For complex structures, EN 30607 [5] specifies the minimum amount of incoming data which a system
shall be capable of buffering and decoding. It does not specify the maximum. This requirement is in line
with the recommended defaults for the lower layers.
6.5.2 Out of scope settings
Some of the current "out of scope" settings in EN 30607-3 [5], should in fact be forbidden or "excluded"
(e.g. Activity Management). This is under discussion within EWOS but does not effect the current ETS as
it would mean changes in EN 30607-3 [5], which are not specific to ETSI file transfer. These are, in any
case, features which are not conformance tested or implemented. Nevertheless, other optional or out of
scope facilities may be negotiated by implementations of this teleservice, they are not subject to
conformance to this ETS.
Page 13
ETS 300 388: February 1995
6.6 Details of FTAM internal service
Support for the following document types shall be mandatory:
Title Name Object Identifier
FTAM-1 Unstructured text file 1,0,8571,5,1;
FTAM-3 Unstructured binary file 1,0,8571,5,3.
Support for this document type is conditional on a claim for full conformance:
Title Name Object Identifier
NBS-9 File Directory Support 1,3,14,5,5,9.
Support for the following document type is optional (but strongly recommended):
Title Name Object Identifier
FTAM-2 Sequential text file 1,0,8571,5,2.
Support for the File Transfer class shall be mandatory.
The File Transfer class only allows a single complete transfer of a complete file within each Selection. It
also forces concatenation (or grouping) of requests whenever possible to reduce protocol overheads.
Support for the File Transfer and Management class shall be mandatory in a full service.
The File Transfer and Management class is a combination of the File Transfer and File Management
classes.
The actions which can be performed on a complete file are as follows:
File - Select/Deselect
Create/Delete (delete is optional)
Open/Close
Attributes - Read/Change (including change filename = rename)
Contents - Read
Write Append
Replace
Navigate - Change Filename prefix.
NOTE: Navigate is available with the FileStore Management Amendment 1 to ISO/IEC 8571
[7]. Profiles will be completed for this within 6 months.
6.6.1 File transparency
The transparency of user data is assured by the use of Presentation context. FTAM adds no overhead
and user file data is passed directly to the presentation layer.
7 Use of directory including the X.500 Directory
The EWOS work for the use of the Directory based on CCITT Recommendations X.500 to X.521 by
FTAM has been harmonized with the other Regional Workshops (OIW and AOW), and is currently
registered within EWOS as ISO/IEC DISP 11190 "The use of the directory by FTAM". This defines the
initial use of CCITT Recommendation X.500 by the ETSI Simple FTAM Profile.
FTAM can use a directory (local or remote, or CCITT Recommendation X.500) to convert Application
Entity Titles into a combination of a Presentation Address (including Presentation, Session and Transport
selectors as well as the Network Address) and the information necessary to set-up the ISDN call. This
latter information being used to transparently drive the ISDN Control Plane.

Page 14
ETS 300 388: February 1995
There are a number of pieces of addressing information, each of which has a different purpose and
format.
From the user view, he inputs the Application Entity Title or a more user friendly alias. This shall be
translated by a built-in list, local directory, or remote directory (CCITT Recommendation X.500) into two
pieces of information which are related. These are the Presentation Address, which includes the Network
Address, and, optionally, the Sub-Network Point of Attachment (SNPA) (if it is not derivable from the
network address).
The SNPA is, in general, the physical address of the connection point of the terminal on its relevant sub-
network. In this ETS, it is the ISDN address information. This shall be passed transparently to the ISDN
Control Plane.
The Presentation Address contains the Transport Service Access Point Identifier (TSAP-Id) and a series
of Selectors for the upper layers to allow multiple instances of the same protocol and multiple types of
application to be differentiated. Thus allowing a server to allow many terminals to connect simultaneously
and to allow a terminal to run interactive editing (VT) in parallel with file transfer (FTAM). The selectors are
not significant (see clause 12). The Presentation Address also contains the Network Service Access Point
(NSAP) which allows an ISDN terminal to traverse multiple sub-networks other than ISDN or link into
ISDN through Packet Switched Public Data Network (PSPDN).
8 Logging
In addition to the normal logging of communication events, FTAM defines a series of eighteen Attributes.
At least, the following eight, if values are available, should be logged as tracing information:
Date and time of Creation;
Date and time of last modification;
Date and time of last read access;
Date and time of last attribute modification;
Identity of creator;
Identity of last modifier;
Identity of last reader;
Identity of last attribute modifier.
The use of the Storage Group of Attributes and full support for at least the above group of attributes is,
therefore, conditional on a claim to full conformance in order to allow these remote attributes to be read
and retained in a local log file. For basic conformance these are not required, but are strongly
recommended.
In addition, local functions shall be provided to register and clearly indicate to the user the result of each
communication event. This indication should be provided by a log which contains the information in
chronological order. The log should include a trace of any communication event or any communication
incident. The log-examine function should always be able to access the log, whatever the status of the call
may be and the operation mode. The log-examine function should be able to access, at least, the latest
communication events.
9 Delta to the ISPICS from EN 30607, Part 3
The following specifies the changes from the EN 30607-3 [5], annex A, the ISPICS Requirements List
which are felt necessary for the ISDN terminal-to-terminal environment. They are additional constraints
and are conformant with EN 30607-3 [5], annex A. Their rationale is described in earlier clauses. The
ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], clause A.x.x references are to the relevant subclause in EN 30607-3 [5], annex A and
ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6] (FTAM PICS, annex A).
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], clause A.5
Addition of the published technical corrigenda.

Page 15
ETS 300 388: February 1995
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], clause A.7
All four roles shall be mandatory for an implementation claiming full conformance, this allows symmetric
terminal-to-terminal operation. A note is added to explain how a basic conformant implementation (e.g. a
simpler terminal or server), conformant to EN 30607-3 [5], but not to this ETS, could interwork with an
ETS conformant system (see subclause 6.1).
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], clause A.9
The INTAP AS1 abstract syntax is not included as there is no clear requirement for very large (Gigabit)
binary file transfers between terminals. FTAM-3 is adequate. INTAP AS1 is conditional on INTAP-1
document Type which is optional in EN 30607-3 [5]. This is, therefore, not a technical change, but one of
emphasis.
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], subclause A.10.2.1
The Storage Group of Attributes shall be mandatory for fully conformant implementations as they are
widely implemented and highly desirable for reliable logging.
For Maximum Level Security (or Multi Level Secure systems (MLS)) it has been noted that the
combination of Change Attribute and the Security Group of Attributes is not safe as it allows the Access
Control Vector to be modified. It is optional in EN 30607-3 [5].
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], subclause A.10.2.2
For logging purposes in an MLS situation, a fully conformant implementation of the Storage Group of
Attributes shall be fully supported.
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], subclause A.11.11
Change Attributes is outside the scope of ISP 30607-3 [5] and for basic implementations. It is, however,
mandatory in this ETS for implementations claiming full conformance, as it is necessary for the renaming
of a file.
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], subclause A.12.4
The support of the Transfer and Management class shall be mandatory for full conformance of this ETS.
(This function is not mandatory in AFT11).
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], subclause A.12.5
Following on from subclause A.12.4 of EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], the support of the Limited
File Management functional unit shall be mandatory in Transfer class and the support of the Enhanced
File Management Functional unit is optional for a basic implementation conforming to AFT11 but strongly
recommended. It shall be mandatory for an implementation claiming full conformance with this ETS but
not in combination with the Security group of attributes.
EN 30607-3 [5] or ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], clause A.13
The INTAP-1 Document Type is not included in the list. It is optional in EN 30607-3 [5]. See also annex A,
clause A.9. Conversely, in order to be able to list a directory, NBS-9 shall become conditional.
NBS-9 is optional but strongly recommended for a basic implementation conforming to AFT11 and shall
be mandatory for implementations claiming full conformance with this ETS in order to be able to list files.

Page 16
ETS 300 388: February 1995
10 ACSE, Presentation and Session Profile for FTAM over ISDN
10.1 Association Control Service Element (ACSE)
The rules of EN 30607-1 [5] shall apply. In particular, the requirements of clause 6 shall be supported. No
additional constraints shall be imposed.
10.2 Presentation layer and Transfer syntax
10.2.1 General
The rules of EN 30607-1 [5] shall apply. In particular, the requirements of clauses 7 and 8 shall be
supported.
10.2.2 Context management
The use of P-Alter context is outside the scope of this ETS as it is not considered necessary in a simple
terminal environment with a limited number of Document Types and, hence, a small number of
Presentation Contexts.
10.2.3 Context restoration
This is not required by FTAM.
10.2.4 Document translation
The Presentation layer only allows for simple character translation or different encoding of other
information. Each system should be able to deal with simple ASCII text (mandatory function in FTAM-1),
see ISO/IEC 8571-5 [6], and optionally (strongly recommended) with the Office Document Interchange
Format (ODIF), see ISO 8613-5. Local mappings between these two standard formats and the local WP
format can then be made.
The use of PC formats such as Word-RTF format sent in FTAM-1 (unstructured text) can also be used as
a suitable exchange mechanism, especially between different manufacturers equipment.
10.3 Session Layer
10.3.1 Session version 2 - unlimited user data
Session version 2 for the use of unlimited user data, as specified in ISO 8327 [14], addendum 2, shall be
used.
NOTE: EN 30607-3 [5] and all existing implementations of FTAM make use of version 2 of the
session service which specifies "unlimited" user data. This allows Application protocols
to correctly report cancel and abort problems and to recover from them. The Restart
and Recovery mechanisms of FTAM are the prime examples of this requirement.
10.3.2 Extended concatenation
Extended concatenation shall not be required.
10.3.3 Session segmenting
Session segmenting shall not be required. It can be refused using the negotiation mechanisms of the
session protocol.
10.3.4 Minor Synchronise
Minor Synchronise shall be mandatory in full automatic mode and shall, therefore, be specified as
conditional.
Page 17
ETS 300 388: February 1995
10.3.5 Resynchronise
Resynchronise shall be mandatory in full automatic mode.
11 Lower layers application rules
11.1 General
This clause defines the delta changes necessary to run FTAM simple file transfer over ETS 300 080 [13]
for the lower layers. It adds specific application rules to ETS 300 080 [13] in order to run FTAM efficiently
and reliably over the ISDN. All references shown in italic in the following subclauses are direct references
to ETS 300 080 [13].
11.2 Application rules for lower layer protocols based on ETS 300 080 for "FTAM simple file
transfer over ISDN"
For each of the following subclauses, the relevant subclause of ETS 300 080 [13] is indicated in italic.
11.2.1 Scope (clause 1)
Add to the "telematic services considered" a new entry for:
- "FTAM over ISDN".
11.2.2 Model description (clause 4)
Details given for each subclause.
11.2.2.1 Protocol pillars (subclause 4.1)
Subclause 4.1 of ETS 300 080 [13] shall apply for "FTAM over ISDN" with the following modification of the
last but one paragraph.
"For the application of "FTAM over ISDN", transport connections are provided by ISO/IEC 8073 [15] (with
Application rules imposed as indicated in clause 8)."
11.2.2.2 Co-ordination between B-Channel and D-Channel (subclause 4.2)
Subclause 4.2 shall apply without any additional rule.
11.2.2.3 Mapping of ETS 300 102-1 causes to OSI CONS reasons (subclause 4.3)
Subclause 4.3 shall apply without any additional rule.
11.2.3 Layer 1 protocols (clause 5)
Clause 5 shall apply without any additional rule (see note 1).
11.2.4 D-channel layer 2 (clause 6)
Clause 6 shall apply without any additional rule.
11.2.5 D-channel layer 3 (clause 7)
Details given for each subclause.
11.2.5.1 The access protocol (subclause 7.1)
Subclause 7.1 shall apply without any additional rule.

Page 18
ETS 300 388: February 199
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...