prEN 17367

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-maj-2019
5DYQDQMH]RGSDGNL3RGDWNRYQHNRPXQLNDFLMHPHGNRPXQLNDFLMVNLPVLVWHPRP
XSUDYOMDQMDLQ]DOHGQLPVLVWHPRP]DQHSUHPLþQHSRVRGH
Waste Management - Data communication between communication management
system and the back office system for stationary containers
Abfallwirtschaft - Datenkommunikation zwischen dem
Kommunikationsmanagementsystem und dem nachgeordneten Verwaltungssystem für
Stationärcontainer
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 17367
ICS:
13.030.40 Naprave in oprema za Installations and equipment
odstranjevanje in obdelavo for waste disposal and
odpadkov treatment
35.240.99 8SRUDEQLãNHUHãLWYH,7QD IT applications in other fields
GUXJLKSRGURþMLK
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
March 2019
ICS 13.030.40
English Version
Waste Management - Data communication between
communication management system and the back office
system for stationary containers
Abfallwirtschaft - Datenkommunikation zwischen dem
Kommunikationsmanagementsystem und dem
nachgeordneten Verwaltungssystem für
Stationärcontainer
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee
CEN/TC 183.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations
which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other
language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC
Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 17367:2019 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Domain Model . 6
5 Communication protocol . 8
6 Interface documentation . 10
Annex A (normative) HMAC Authentication . 14
A.1 What is HMAC Authentication? . 14
A.2 Flow of using API Key — HMAC Authentication: . 14
A.2.1 General . 14
A.2.2 Flow on the client side: . 14
A.2.3 Flow on the server side: . 15
A.2.4 Important note: . 15
A.2.5 Reference: . 15
Annex B (normative) Code Lists . 16
B.1 Generalities . 16
B.2 Supplier Codes . 16
B.3 Transaction Types . 16
B.4 Access Chip Types . 16
B.5 Trigger Codes . 17
B.6 Measurement Codes . 17
B.7 Malfunction Codes . 17
B.8 SystemInfo Codes . 18
B.9 Setting Codes . 18
B.10 Action Codes . 18
B.11 Opening State Codes . 19
European foreword
This document (prEN 17367:2019) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 183 “Waste
management”, the secretariat of which is held by DIN.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
Introduction
The waste processing industry has been exchanging digital information for quite some years now.
Besides, the use of chips to recognize access chips and containers also has a history in this industry. The
waste processing companies are experiencing the advantages of exchanging information electronically
and recognizing containers and access chips, but are also experiencing that exchanging information, or
recognizing containers and access chips based on different specifications is not optimal: it requires
quite some work, time and money to exchange or receive information from other parties.
To change the current situation to a flexible situation in which the identification of cards and containers
can be used with different systems and different suppliers, and to make it possible to exchange
information between the different systems it is necessary to define standards. With these standards
interoperability in the industry can be achieved, leading to easier coupling of systems and increased
interoperability between different systems. In terms of market access for buyers and final customers,
this standard is aimed to open the market thanks to the compatibility between the access control server
and the third-party management software.
1 Scope
This document defines the standard for implementing a standard inter-vendors interface aimed at
exchanging stationary waste container information and configuration.
This document defines the way to exchange data between the “Communication Management Systems”
and the “Back-Office Systems”.
The exchange of data between the “Collection Container Systems” and the “Communication
Management Systems” or the “Back-Office Systems” is excluded.
This document targets two streams of information in the waste processing industry:
— The processing of information from the deposit of waste, between communication management
systems and the back office systems.
— The processing of configuration information, between the back-office systems and the
communication management systems.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
• IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
Communication Management System
CMS
application that connects to the controller, depth sensor or in general, an electronic registration device
installed in a container
3.2
Back-Office System
BOS
application(s) that the customer uses to manage authorization, registration and invoicing of waste
deposits, etc.
3.3
reader
device, placed on a collection container, capable of reading the information contained on a chip
3.4
controller
device capable of interaction with a reader and transferring the information from a chip to reusable
information
3.5
chip
device carrying data, which can be recognized by a reading device
3.6
access chip (e.g. Card or Tag)
device (like a credit card) capable of carrying a chip. Also assimilated are the Tags or any other way of
identifying a user for the access control
3.7
collection container
reservoir capable of containing waste for more than one household or building
3.8
collection container system
reservoir capable of containing waste for more than one household or building together with all its
electronics to manage the system
3.9
black list
authorization list that contains identification numbers that when read should be refused by the system
using the register
3.10
white list
authorization list that contains identification numbers that when read should be handled by the system
using the register
3.11
authorisation list
register containing identification numbers that should be refused or handled by the system using the
register
3.12
management and configuration system
system provided by the supplier of a system to manage and configure the collection container system or
the system
3.13
waste processing back office
systems that the waste processing companies use to manage the collection of waste, containers and all
other relevant internal processes
4 Domain Model
4.1 General
This chapter describes the models on which the standard is based. Overview of the systems and activity
diagrams.
4.2 Overview of the systems
Figure 1 exposes the context in which the standard interface is useful.
Figure 1 — Overview of the systems
4.3 Activity diagrams
Figures 2 and 3 shows the activity diagrams that define the processes in which the standard is used.

Figure 2 — Activities from CMS to BOS
Figure 3 — Activities from BOS to CMS
5 Communication protocol
5.1 General
This section describes the standard rules for the implementation of the communication protocol.
To comply with the standard, all definitions shall be implemented and supported by the protocol.
Other standards and conventions shall be respected when they are mentioned in this document.
Recommendations should be supported by the implementation of the protocol.
5.2 Definitions (SHALL)
5.2.1 Communication is done through RESTful web-services
Restful web-services are the industry standard for building efficient interfaces between distributed
systems. There is a large number of resources to assist the developers in almost any available
programming language.
5.2.2 Transport is secured with SSL
Always use SSL. No exceptions. Today, your web APIs can get accessed from anywhere there is internet
(like libraries, coffee shops, airports among others). Not all of these are secure. Many don't encrypt
communications at all, allowing for easy eavesdropping or impersonation if authentication credentials
are hijacked.
Another advantage of always using SSL is that guaranteed encrypted communications simplifies
authentication efforts — you can get away with simple access tokens instead of having to sign each API
request.
One
...