ASTM F86-21
(Practice)Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants
Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The objective of surface treatments as documented in this practice is to improve the corrosion resistance of metallic surgical implants including, but not limited to, those manufactured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, and tantalum base materials.
3.2 Iron particles, ceramic media, and other foreign particles may become smeared over or embedded into the surface of implants during processing operations such as forming, machining, tumbling, media blasting, marking, and so forth. These particles should be removed to minimize localized corrosion and superficial blemishes.
3.3 The various chemical and electrochemical surface treatments specified by this practice are used to remove objectionable surface contaminants and to restore maximum corrosion resistance to, or promote the creation of, an inert or passive surface, such as a metal oxide film, as is applicable to the specific material. Some of these treatments are referred to as passivation treatments. The preferred surface treatment for a given application varies depending on the implant material and the nature of the surface contaminants.
3.4 Depending on the implant, its material, and the type of marking method and procedure, the marking may be applied before or after a chemical or electrochemical surface treatment. When marking is performed after the surface treatment, the localized implant surface shall be evaluated to determine if there is a need for additional surface treatment.
Note 1: The need for additional surface treatment is likely for stainless steel with all marking methods, and for nonferrous alloys when the marking method involves direct or second-hand contact with iron-based or other material that would be considered an objectionable surface contaminant.
3.5 The selection of procedures to be applied to the implants, and additional requirements which are not covered by this practice, may be included in the implant production specification.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice provides descriptions of surface characteristics, surface preparation, and marking for metallic surgical implants, with the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance of the implant surfaces and markings.
1.2 Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin are not specified in this practice (see X1.4).
1.3 Surface requirements and marking methods included in the implant specification shall take precedence over requirements listed in this practice, where appropriate.
1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
General Information
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 31-May-2021
- Technical Committee
- F04 - Medical and Surgical Materials and Devices
- Drafting Committee
- F04.12 - Metallurgical Materials
Relations
- Effective Date
- 01-Nov-2019
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2018
- Refers
ASTM F983-86(2018) - Standard Practice for Permanent Marking of Orthopaedic Implant Components - Effective Date
- 01-Feb-2018
- Effective Date
- 01-Jul-2017
- Effective Date
- 01-Apr-2016
- Effective Date
- 01-Aug-2014
- Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2013
- Refers
ASTM F983-86(2013) - Standard Practice for Permanent Marking of Orthopaedic Implant Components - Effective Date
- 01-Oct-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-May-2013
- Effective Date
- 15-Feb-2013
- Effective Date
- 15-Feb-2013
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2011
- Effective Date
- 01-Dec-2011
- Effective Date
- 01-Sep-2011
- Effective Date
- 01-Mar-2011
Overview
ASTM F86-21 - Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants establishes guidelines for the surface preparation and marking of metallic surgical implants, aiming to enhance corrosion resistance and surface quality. Applicable to implants manufactured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, tantalum, and their alloys, this standard supports manufacturers in reducing the risk of corrosion and ensuring implant longevity and traceability. The document applies to diverse processing methods and outlines accepted surface cleaning, treatment, and marking procedures, ensuring both safety and performance in medical device manufacturing.
Key Topics
- Corrosion Resistance: The standard emphasizes surface treatments to boost the corrosion resistance of metallic surgical implants, a key factor in device safety and durability.
- Surface Contaminant Removal: During manufacturing processes such as machining, blasting, or marking, potential contaminants (e.g., iron, ceramic particles) may become embedded on implant surfaces. ASTM F86-21 requires thorough removal of these foreign particles to prevent localized corrosion and blemishes.
- Chemical and Electrochemical Treatments: Procedures such as passivation, acid treatment, electropolishing, and anodizing are described, depending on the implant material and type of contaminant present. Passive oxide films are created or restored to enhance surface stability.
- Order of Marking and Treatment: The standard provides recommendations for when to perform marking relative to surface treatment, noting that post-marking treatments may be necessary to remove residual contaminants.
- Acceptable Surface Qualities: Metallic implants must be free of visible imperfections, such as tool marks, nicks, and scratches, as well as foreign materials. Final surface finish requirements are to be specified in production documentation.
- Cleaning and Neutralization: The standard outlines appropriate cleaning steps-including organic solvent degreasing, hot or electrochemical alkaline cleaning, ultrasonic agitation, and acid cleaning-followed by neutralization, rinsing, and drying. Endotoxin neutralization falls outside the standard’s main scope, yet manufacturers must control biological contaminants according to regulatory guidance.
- Marking Methods: The document lists acceptable implant marking techniques, such as mechanical imprinting, chemical etching, casting, electro-pencil, vibratory marking, and laser marking. Markings should not compromise implant mechanical properties or prompt adverse biological responses.
Applications
ASTM F86-21 is relevant for:
- Medical Device Manufacturers: Ensures that surface preparation and marking processes for metallic surgical implants meet internationally recognized practices, enhancing patient safety and device longevity.
- Quality Assurance Teams: Provides inspection and documentation procedures to verify surface integrity, cleanliness, and marking quality of manufacturing output.
- Engineers and Designers: Assists in developing and documenting manufacturing protocols for surgical implants, specifying appropriate surface finishes and traceability markings.
- Regulatory Compliance: Supports fulfillment of regulatory requirements concerning implant biocompatibility, corrosion resistance, and traceability, including FDA and ISO mandates.
Implementing ASTM F86-21 can reduce risks of implant failure, minimize the likelihood of localized corrosion, and improve product reliability in clinical use.
Related Standards
To ensure comprehensive compliance and optimal processing, ASTM F86-21 references several related standards:
- ASTM A380/A380M: Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment, and Systems.
- ASTM A967/A967M: Specification for Chemical Passivation Treatments for Stainless Steel Parts.
- ASTM B600: Guide for Descaling and Cleaning Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces.
- ASTM B912: Specification for Passivation of Stainless Steels Using Electropolishing.
- ASTM F748: Practice for Selecting Generic Biological Test Methods for Materials and Devices.
- ASTM F983: Practice for Permanent Marking of Orthopaedic Implant Components.
- ISO 10993-11: Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices - Part 11: Tests for Systemic Toxicity.
- USP <161>: Medical Devices-Bacterial Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests.
- FDA Guidance: Pyrogens and Endotoxins Testing.
- AAMI ST72: Bacterial endotoxins-Test methods, routine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing.
Keywords: ASTM F86-21, surgical implants, surface preparation, corrosion resistance, passivation, medical device marking, metal implants, medical device standards, manufacturing, quality assurance.
Buy Documents
ASTM F86-21 - Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants
REDLINE ASTM F86-21 - Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

BSI Group
BSI (British Standards Institution) is the business standards company that helps organizations make excellence a habit.

TÜV Rheinland
TÜV Rheinland is a leading international provider of technical services.

TÜV SÜD
TÜV SÜD is a trusted partner of choice for safety, security and sustainability solutions.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
ASTM F86-21 is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Practice for Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical Implants". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 3.1 The objective of surface treatments as documented in this practice is to improve the corrosion resistance of metallic surgical implants including, but not limited to, those manufactured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, and tantalum base materials. 3.2 Iron particles, ceramic media, and other foreign particles may become smeared over or embedded into the surface of implants during processing operations such as forming, machining, tumbling, media blasting, marking, and so forth. These particles should be removed to minimize localized corrosion and superficial blemishes. 3.3 The various chemical and electrochemical surface treatments specified by this practice are used to remove objectionable surface contaminants and to restore maximum corrosion resistance to, or promote the creation of, an inert or passive surface, such as a metal oxide film, as is applicable to the specific material. Some of these treatments are referred to as passivation treatments. The preferred surface treatment for a given application varies depending on the implant material and the nature of the surface contaminants. 3.4 Depending on the implant, its material, and the type of marking method and procedure, the marking may be applied before or after a chemical or electrochemical surface treatment. When marking is performed after the surface treatment, the localized implant surface shall be evaluated to determine if there is a need for additional surface treatment. Note 1: The need for additional surface treatment is likely for stainless steel with all marking methods, and for nonferrous alloys when the marking method involves direct or second-hand contact with iron-based or other material that would be considered an objectionable surface contaminant. 3.5 The selection of procedures to be applied to the implants, and additional requirements which are not covered by this practice, may be included in the implant production specification. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides descriptions of surface characteristics, surface preparation, and marking for metallic surgical implants, with the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance of the implant surfaces and markings. 1.2 Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin are not specified in this practice (see X1.4). 1.3 Surface requirements and marking methods included in the implant specification shall take precedence over requirements listed in this practice, where appropriate. 1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 3.1 The objective of surface treatments as documented in this practice is to improve the corrosion resistance of metallic surgical implants including, but not limited to, those manufactured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, and tantalum base materials. 3.2 Iron particles, ceramic media, and other foreign particles may become smeared over or embedded into the surface of implants during processing operations such as forming, machining, tumbling, media blasting, marking, and so forth. These particles should be removed to minimize localized corrosion and superficial blemishes. 3.3 The various chemical and electrochemical surface treatments specified by this practice are used to remove objectionable surface contaminants and to restore maximum corrosion resistance to, or promote the creation of, an inert or passive surface, such as a metal oxide film, as is applicable to the specific material. Some of these treatments are referred to as passivation treatments. The preferred surface treatment for a given application varies depending on the implant material and the nature of the surface contaminants. 3.4 Depending on the implant, its material, and the type of marking method and procedure, the marking may be applied before or after a chemical or electrochemical surface treatment. When marking is performed after the surface treatment, the localized implant surface shall be evaluated to determine if there is a need for additional surface treatment. Note 1: The need for additional surface treatment is likely for stainless steel with all marking methods, and for nonferrous alloys when the marking method involves direct or second-hand contact with iron-based or other material that would be considered an objectionable surface contaminant. 3.5 The selection of procedures to be applied to the implants, and additional requirements which are not covered by this practice, may be included in the implant production specification. SCOPE 1.1 This practice provides descriptions of surface characteristics, surface preparation, and marking for metallic surgical implants, with the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance of the implant surfaces and markings. 1.2 Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin are not specified in this practice (see X1.4). 1.3 Surface requirements and marking methods included in the implant specification shall take precedence over requirements listed in this practice, where appropriate. 1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard. 1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
ASTM F86-21 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 11.040.40 - Implants for surgery, prosthetics and orthotics. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
ASTM F86-21 has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM E2275-19, ASTM B912-02(2018), ASTM F983-86(2018), ASTM A967/A967M-17, ASTM F748-16, ASTM E2275-14, ASTM E2275-13, ASTM F983-86(2013), ASTM B912-02(2013), ASTM A380/A380M-13, ASTM A967/A967M-13, ASTM E2148-11b, ASTM E2657-11, ASTM B600-11, ASTM E2148-11a. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.
ASTM F86-21 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: F86 − 21
Standard Practice for
Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical
Implants
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F86; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original
adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.Asuperscript
epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope* vation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment, and Systems
A967/A967M Specification for Chemical Passivation Treat-
1.1 This practice provides descriptions of surface
ments for Stainless Steel Parts
characteristics, surface preparation, and marking for metallic
B600 Guide for Descaling and Cleaning Titanium and Tita-
surgical implants, with the purpose of improving the corrosion
nium Alloy Surfaces
resistance of the implant surfaces and markings.
B912 Specification for Passivation of Stainless Steels Using
1.2 Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin
Electropolishing
are not specified in this practice (see X1.4).
E2148 GuideforUsingDocumentsRelatedtoMetalworking
1.3 Surface requirements and marking methods included in or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety
E2275 Practice for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalwork-
the implant specification shall take precedence over require-
ments listed in this practice, where appropriate. ing Fluid Bioresistance and Antimicrobial Pesticide Per-
formance
1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units
E2657 Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Concentra-
are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in
tions in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each
F748 PracticeforSelectingGenericBiologicalTestMethods
system shall be used independently of the other. Combining
for Materials and Devices
values from the two systems may result in nonconformance
F983 Practice for Permanent Marking of Orthopaedic Im-
with the standard.
plant Components
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the 3
2.2 ISO Standard:
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
ISO 10993-11:2017 Biological Evaluation of Medical
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Devices—Part 11: Tests for Systemic Toxicity, Annex G
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
2.3 USP Standard:
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
USP General Chapter <161> Medical Devices—Bacterial
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests (2019)
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
2.4 FDA Document:
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
FDA Guidance for Industry: Pyrogens and Endotoxins
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
Testing: Questions and Answers, 2012 (updated in 2019)
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
2.5 AAMI Standard:
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
AAMIST72:2019 Bacterialendotoxins—Testmethods,rou-
tine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing
2. Referenced Documents
3. Significance and Use
2.1 ASTM Standards:
A380/A380M Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passi-
3.1 The objective of surface treatments as documented in
this practice is to improve the corrosion resistance of metallic
ThispracticeisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeF04onMedicaland
Surgical Materials and Devices and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
F04.12 on Metallurgical Materials. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Current edition approved June 1, 2021. Published June 2021. Originally Available from U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), 12601 Twinbrook
approved in 1984. Last previous edition approved in 2013 as F86 – 13. DOI: Pkwy., Rockville, MD 20852-1790, http://www.usp.org.
10.1520/F0086-21. Available from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, http://www.fda.gov.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on (AAMI), 4301 N. Fairfax Dr., Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633, http://
the ASTM website. www.aami.org.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F86−21
environmentally assisted cracking of titanium and its alloys should be
surgical implants including, but not limited to, those manufac-
avoided.
tured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, and tantalum base
materials.
5.2.2 Amethodsuchasoneofthefollowingfortheremoval
of adherent foreign material, if necessary:
3.2 Ironparticles,ceramicmedia,andotherforeignparticles
5.2.2.1 Hot alkaline cleaner, used as recommended.
may become smeared over or embedded into the surface of
5.2.2.2 Alkaline cleaner applied electrochemically as rec-
implants during processing operations such as forming,
ommended.
machining, tumbling, media blasting, marking, and so forth.
These particles should be removed to minimize localized
NOTE 3—Avoid cathodic cleaning of metals known to be susceptible to
corrosion and superficial blemishes.
hydrogen contamination and anodic cleaning of metals known to be
susceptible to pitting.
3.3 The various chemical and electrochemical surface treat-
5.2.2.3 Ultrasonically agitated cleaning agent.
ments specified by this practice are used to remove objection-
5.2.3 An acidic cleaning process may be used. For titanium,
able surface contaminants and to restore maximum corrosion
titanium alloys, and tantalum, some possible cleaning pro-
resistance to, or promote the creation of, an inert or passive
surface, such as a metal oxide film, as is applicable to the cesses may be found in Guide B600.
specific material. Some of these treatments are referred to as
NOTE 4—Before an acidic cleaning, degreasing shall be considered
passivation treatments. The preferred surface treatment for a
where appropriate to make the acidic cleaning effective in a uniform
given application varies depending on the implant material and
manner. In addition, testing to confirm that acidic cleaning will not affect
the mechanical properties of materials susceptible to hydrogen contami-
the nature of the surface contaminants.
nation effects, either with or without a relief bake, should be considered.
3.4 Depending on the implant, its material, and the type of
5.2.3.1 If acidic cleaning methods are used, this shall be
marking method and procedure, the marking may be applied
stated in the implant production specification.
beforeorafterachemicalorelectrochemicalsurfacetreatment.
When marking is performed after the surface treatment, the
5.3 A neutralizing treatment shall be carried out where
localized implant surface shall be evaluated to determine if
appropriate.
there is a need for additional surface treatment.
5.4 An adequate rinsing operation shall be carried out.
NOTE1—Theneedforadditionalsurfacetreatmentislikelyforstainless
5.5 An adequate drying cycle shall follow.
steel with all marking methods, and for nonferrous alloys when the
markingmethodinvolvesdirectorsecond-handcontactwithiron-basedor
other material that would be considered an objectionable surface contami- 6. Surface Treatment
nant.
6.1 Implants shall be given a surface treatment before they
3.5 The selection of procedures to be applied to the
are packaged in order to create, restore, promote, or otherwise
implants, and additional requirements which are not covered
ensure a passive surface. The surface treatment used should be
by this practice, may be included in the implant production
specified in the production procedure documentation. A num-
specification.
ber of different surface treatments may be acceptable
including, but not limited to, acid treatment, electropolishing,
4. Description of Acceptable Surface Characteristics
anodizing, and oxidation. The following surface treatments are
provided as examples, and this list should not be considered
4.1 Metallic implants, when inspected in accordance with
restrictive:
this practice, shall be free of surface imperfections such as tool
marks, nicks, scratches, cracks, cavities, burrs, and other
NOTE 5—While this standard does not specify endotoxin neutralization,
defects that would impair the serviceability of the device. The
the manufacturer is responsible for appropriate monitoring and control of
surfaces shall be cleaned to minimize the presence of foreign
endotoxin in cleaning and treatment baths, post-treatment testing for the
presence of endotoxin and other residual contaminants that may present
material.
biological hazards, and the elimination of such as appropriate. See X1.4.
4.2 Specific finish requirements such as texture, surface
6.2 Certain acid treatments for the removal of surface free
roughness, or additional surface treatments shall be included in
iron can provide passive surface conditions for stainless steel,
the implant production specification.
and also for nonferrous metals and alloys that possess or may
4.3 The implants shall be given an appropriate surface
possess iron contamination on the implant surface. Such
treatment according to Section 6.
treatments provide passivation by surface oxidation and are
able to dissolve certain foreign material that might be present
5. Cleaning
from previous operations; they are, therefore, particularly
recommended when no other treatments that would remove
5.1 Thesurfaceoftheimplantsshallbecleanedtominimize
such foreign material take place. (See X1.3, Specification
foreign material.
A967/A967M, and Practice A380/A380M.)
5.2 The cleaning operations used shall relate to the follow-
6.2.1 Example acid surface treatments are as follows:
ing as appropriate:
6.2.2 Immerse in a 20 to 45 volume % nitric acid solution,
5.2.1 A method such as organic solvent degreasing for the
at a temperature range from 20 to 30 °C [70 to 90 °F], for a
removal of oils, greases, and other loose surface contaminants.
minimumof30min.Thispassivationtreatmentisequivalentto
NOTE 2—Anhydrous methanol and other solvents known to cause the Nitric 2 treatment in Specification A967/A967M.
F86−21
6.2.3 For an accelerated process, a 20 to 25 volume % nitric 7.3 Locate the marking or labeling on the implant at a point
acid solution, heated at a t
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: F86 − 13 F86 − 21
Standard Practice for
Surface Preparation and Marking of Metallic Surgical
Implants
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F86; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original
adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript
epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope*
1.1 This practice provides descriptions of surface characteristics, surface preparation, and marking for metallic surgical implants,
with the purpose of improving the corrosion resistance of the implant surfaces and markings.
1.2 Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin are not specified in this practice (see X1.4).
1.3 This practice provides a description of surface characteristics, methods of surface preparation, and methods of marking for
metallic surgical implants. Marking nomenclature and neutralization of endotoxin are not specified in this practice (see X1.3).
Surface requirements and marking methods included in the implant specification shall take precedence over requirements listed
in this practice, where appropriate.
1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values given in
parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered stated in each
system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the
two systems may result in nonconformance with the standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety safety, health, and healthenvironmental practices and determine the
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
A380A380/A380M Practice for Cleaning, Descaling, and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment, and Systems
A967A967/A967M Specification for Chemical Passivation Treatments for Stainless Steel Parts
B600 Guide for Descaling and Cleaning Titanium and Titanium Alloy Surfaces
B912 Specification for Passivation of Stainless Steels Using Electropolishing
E2148 Guide for Using Documents Related to Metalworking or Metal Removal Fluid Health and Safety
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F04 on Medical and Surgical Materials and Devices and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F04.12
on Metallurgical Materials.
Current edition approved June 1, 2013June 1, 2021. Published July 2013June 2021. Originally approved in 1984. Last previous edition approved in 20122013 as
F86 – 12a.F86 – 13. DOI: 10.1520/F0086-13.10.1520/F0086-21.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
*A Summary of Changes section appears at the end of this standard
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
F86 − 21
E2275 Practice for Evaluating Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluid Bioresistance and Antimicrobial Pesticide Performance
E2657 Practice for Determination of Endotoxin Concentrations in Water-Miscible Metalworking Fluids
F748 Practice for Selecting Generic Biological Test Methods for Materials and Devices
F983 Practice for Permanent Marking of Orthopaedic Implant Components
2.2 ISO Standard:
ISO 10993-11:2017 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 11: Tests for Systemic Toxicity, Annex G
2.3 USP Standard:
USP General Chapter <161> Medical Devices—Bacterial Endotoxin and Pyrogen Tests (2019)
2.4 FDA Document:
FDA Guidance for Industry: Pyrogens and Endotoxins Testing: Questions and Answers, 2012 (updated in 2019)
2.5 AAMI Standard:
AAMI ST72:2019 Bacterial endotoxins—Test methods, routine monitoring, and alternatives to batch testing
3. Significance and Use
3.1 The objective of surface treatments as documented in this practice are intended is to improve the corrosion resistance of
metallic surgical implants including, but not limited to, those manufactured from iron, cobalt, nickel, titanium, and tantalum base
materials.
3.2 Iron particles, ceramic media, and other foreign particles may become smeared over or imbeddedembedded into the surface
of implants during processing operations such as forming, machining, tumbling, beadmedia blasting, marking, and so forth. These
particles should be removed to minimize localized rust formation corrosion and superficial blemishes.
3.3 The various chemical and electrochemical surface treatments specified inby this practice are intendedused to remove
objectionable surface contaminants and to restore maximum corrosion resistance to the passive oxide film.to, or promote the
creation of, an inert or passive surface, such as a metal oxide film, as is applicable to the specific material. Some of these treatments
are referred to as passivation treatments. The preferred surface treatment for a given application varies depending on the implant
material and the nature of the surface contaminants.
3.4 The need for an additional implant surface treatment such as secondary passivation in nitric acid should be evaluated for
localized implant surfaces that have electrochemical or laser product markings created after the final surface Depending on the
implant, its material, and the type of marking method and procedure, the marking may be applied before or after a chemical or
electrochemical surface treatment. When marking is performed after the surface treatment, the localized implant surface shall be
evaluated to determine if there is a need for additional surface treatment.
NOTE 1—The need for additional surface treatment is likely for stainless steel with all marking methods, and for nonferrous alloys when the marking
method involves direct or second-hand contact with iron-based or other material that would be considered an objectionable surface contaminant.
3.5 The selection of procedures to be applied to the implants, and additional requirements which are not covered by this practice,
may be included in the implant production specification.
4. Description of Acceptable Surface Characteristics
4.1 Metallic implants, when inspected in accordance with this practice, shall be free of surface imperfections such as toolmarks,
tool marks, nicks, scratches, cracks, cavities, burrs, and other defects that would impair the serviceability of the device. The
surfaces shall be cleaned to minimize the presence of foreign material.
4.2 Specific finish requirements such as texture, surface roughness, or additional surface treatments shall be included in the
implant production specification.
4.3 The implants shall be given an appropriate final surface treatment according to Section 6.
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Available from U.S. Pharmacopeial Convention (USP), 12601 Twinbrook Pkwy., Rockville, MD 20852-1790, http://www.usp.org.
Available from U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), 10903 New Hampshire Ave., Silver Spring, MD 20993, http://www.fda.gov.
Available from Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI), 4301 N. Fairfax Dr., Suite 301, Arlington, VA 22203-1633, http://www.aami.org.
F86 − 21
5. Cleaning
5.1 The surface of the implants shall be cleaned to minimize foreign material.
5.2 The cleaning operations used shall relate to the following as appropriate:
5.2.1 A method such as organic solvent degreasing for the removal of oils, greases, and other loose surface contaminants.
NOTE 2—Anhydrous methanol and other solvents known to cause environmentally assisted cracking of titanium and its alloys should be avoided.
5.2.2 A method such as one of the following for the removal of adherent foreign material, if necessary.necessary:
5.2.2.1 Hot alkaline cleaner, used as recommended.
5.2.2.2 Alkaline cleaner applied electrochemically as recommended.
NOTE 3—Avoid cathodic cleaning of metals known to be susceptible to hydrogen contamination and anodic cleaning of metals known to be susceptible
to pitting. In addition, testing to confirm that acidic cleaning will not affect the mechanical properties of alloys susceptible to hydrogen contamination
effects should be considered .
5.2.2.3 Ultrasonically agitated cleaning agent.
5.2.3 An acidic cleaning process may be used. For titanium, titanium alloys, and tantalum, some possible cleaning processes may
be found in Guide B600.
NOTE 4—Before an acidic cleaning, degreasing shall be considered where appropriate to make the acidic cleaning effective in a uniform manner. In
addition, testing to confirm that acidic cleaning will not affect the mechanical properties of materials susceptible to hydrogen contamination effects, either
with or without a relief bake, should be considered.
5.2.3.1 If acidic cleaning methods are used, this shall be stated in the implant production specification.
5.3 A neutralizing treatment shall be carried out where appropriate.
5.4 An adequate rinsing operation shall be carried out.
5.5 An adequate drying cycle shall follow.
6. Final Surface Treatment
6.1 Implants shall be given a final surface treatment before they are packaged. packaged in order to create, restore, promote, or
otherwise ensure a passive surface. The surface treatment used should be specified in the production procedure documentation. A
number of different surface treatments are acceptable, including may be acceptable including, but not limited to, acid treatment,
electropolishing, anodizing, and oxidation. The following surface treatments are provided as examples, and this list should not be
considered restrictive:
NOTE 5—While this standard does not specify endotoxin neutralization, the manufacturer is responsible for appropriate monitoring and control of
endotoxin in cleaning and treatment baths, post-treatment testing for the presence of endotoxin and other residual contaminants that may present biological
hazards, and the elimination of such as appropriate. See X1.4.
6.2 Final nitric acid surface treatments are as follows:Certain acid treatments for the removal of surface free iron can provide
passive surface conditions for stainless steel, and also for nonferrous metals and alloys that possess or may possess iron
contamination on the implant surface. Such treatments provide passivation by surface oxidation and are able to dissolve certain
foreign material that might be present from previous operations; they are, therefore, particularly recommended when no other
treatments that would remove such foreign material take place. (See X1.3, Specification A967/A967M, and Practice
A380/A380M.)
F86 − 21
6.2.1 Example acid surface treatments are as follows:
6.2.2 Immerse in a 20 to 45 volume % nitric acid solution, at a temperature range from 20 to 30 °C [70 to 90 °F], for a minimum
of 30 min. This passivation treatment is equivalent to the Nitric 2 treatment in Specification A967/A967M.
6.2.3 Immerse in 20 to 45 volume % nitric acid at room temperature for a minimum of 30 min. The room temperature passivation
treatment is equivalent to the Nitric 2 treatment at a temperature range from 70 to 90°F (21 to 32°C) in Specification A967. For
an accelerated process, a 20 to 25 volume % n
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...