ASTM E2541-07
(Guide)Standard Guide for Stakeholder-Focused, Consensus-Based Disaster Restoration Process for Contaminated Assets
Standard Guide for Stakeholder-Focused, Consensus-Based Disaster Restoration Process for Contaminated Assets
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
The understanding and management of the interrelationship between human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values, and economic well-being of the community and the high-value asset is essential to timely and acceptable restoration. This standard guide is designed to help responsible party(ies) with the identification and integration of affected stakeholders and with the establishment of a process to identify and resolve key issues essential to a satisfactory restoration. The standard guide is presented herein as a “framework” to help ensure that all the restoration planning process components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values and economic well-being) are considered. The framework is designed to allow a user to determine which components of the process are applicable to the restoration problem being addressed, and to establish the level of analytical detail necessary for each component. It provides general guidance to help with the selection of approaches and methods for specific analysis of each of the major restoration planning components (that is, human health, ecological condition, socio-cultural values, and economic well-being).
By actively involving affected stakeholders in the restoration decision-making process, it will help the user to orient the process to prioritize and consider the most important issues of those who’s lives are most directly impacted by the consequences of the event and resulting restoration. This not only greatly increases the chances of a successful and acceptable restoration, but will also help promote public trust in the responsible party’s ability to rapidly restore the high-value asset(s).
SCOPE
1.1 To ensure a publicly acceptable and timely restoration of an asset contaminated as a result of a natural or man-made disaster, including a terrorist event, it is essential to have a pre-planned strategy developed and tailored at the community level and facilitated by the government which advocates the support and involvement of the affected community during such a crisis period. This pre-planned strategy for restoration will need to be seamlessly incorporated into the overall emergency management process within the community. This guide presents a framework (that is, strategy) for involving the public in a stakeholder-focused, consensus-based event restoration process, for those situations where such involvement is essential to move a stalled (due to stakeholder issues) restoration process forward. This framework is designed to be an event-specific, community-specific process to help prioritize and consider actions necessary to optimize the restoration of an asset contaminated as the result of a disaster.
1.2 This guide is intended to describe a highly flexible restoration planning process, and therefore does not specify or recommend a specific course of action for this activity.
1.3 This guide is intended to assist in the implementation of a restoration planning process allowing a holistic assessment and balancing of the impacts associated with human health, ecology, socio-cultural values, and economic implications. It is intended to be used in alignment with current Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance and other guides and agency procedures and requirements to address specific stakeholder issues and concerns.
1.4 After completing the immediate response and stabilization phase of a disaster that required Federal assistance through establishment of a Joint Field Office (JFO) in accordance with the National Response Plan, mitigation and recovery activities will need to be planned and initiated to address the significant long-term impacts for any contaminated assets in the affected area. This guide provides a process that can be used by the JFO to gain stakeholder consensus on the restoration of these assets.
1.5 The user should consult other restoration-related standards, regulations, and sources for...
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E2541 – 07
Standard Guide for
Stakeholder-Focused, Consensus-Based Disaster
1
Restoration Process for Contaminated Assets
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2541; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 1.5 The user should consult other restoration-related stan-
dards, regulations, and sources for specific methods in the
1.1 Toensureapubliclyacceptableandtimelyrestorationof
utilization of predictive models or other analysis tools that may
an asset contaminated as a result of a natural or man-made
be required under a restoration planning assessment.
disaster, including a terrorist event, it is essential to have a
1.6 Although the implementation of a restoration planning
pre-planned strategy developed and tailored at the community
process is intended for use after a disaster occurs, it needs to be
level and facilitated by the government which advocates the
an integral part of a community’s pre-event planning activities
support and involvement of the affected community during
and incorporated into appropriate community response plans.
such a crisis period. This pre-planned strategy for restoration
Identifying the important assets of a community and key
will need to be seamlessly incorporated into the overall
stakeholders associated with each respective asset, before an
emergency management process within the community. This
event occurs through a process such as Community Asset
guide presents a framework (that is, strategy) for involving the
Mapping, will help ensure a more efficient restoration process
public in a stakeholder-focused, consensus-based event resto-
following an actual contamination of the asset in a disastrous
ration process, for those situations where such involvement is
event.
essential to move a stalled (due to stakeholder issues) restora-
1.7 This standard guide does not purport to address all of
tion process forward. This framework is designed to be an
the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
event-specific, community-specific process to help prioritize
responsibility of the user of this standard guide to establish
andconsideractionsnecessarytooptimizetherestorationofan
appropriate safety and health practices and to determine the
asset contaminated as the result of a disaster.
applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.2 This guide is intended to describe a highly flexible
restoration planning process, and therefore does not specify or
2. Referenced Documents
recommend a specific course of action for this activity.
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.3 This guide is intended to assist in the implementation of
E1739 Guide for Risk-Based Corrective Action Applied at
a restoration planning process allowing a holistic assessment
Petroleum Release Sites
and balancing of the impacts associated with human health,
E1984 Guide for Brownfields Redevelopment
ecology, socio-cultural values, and economic implications. It is
E2348 Guide for Framework for a Consensus-based Envi-
intended to be used in alignment with current Federal Emer-
ronmental Decision-making Process
gency Management Agency (FEMA) guidance and other
2.2 Other Documents:
guides and agency procedures and requirements to address
(SARA Title III, 42 U.S.C. §11001 et seq.) Emergency
specific stakeholder issues and concerns.
Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (EPCRA)
1.4 After completing the immediate response and stabiliza-
of 1986
tionphaseofadisasterthatrequiredFederalassistancethrough
(Act 1990-165, 35 P.S. \§6022.101 et seq.) Hazardous
establishment of a Joint Field Office (JFO) in accordance with
Material Emergency Planning and Response Act
the National Response Plan, mitigation and recovery activities
NRP 2004 National Response Plan, including the Nuclear/
will need to be planned and initiated to address the significant
Radiological Incident Annex, Emergency Support Func-
long-term impacts for any contaminated assets in the affected
tion #10 (Oil and Hazardous Materials Response Annex)
area.This guide provides a process that can be used by the JFO
and Emergency Support Function #14 (Long-Term Com-
togainstakeholderconsensusontherestorationoftheseassets.
munity Recovery and Mitigation Annex). December,
1
This Guide is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E54 Homeland
2
Security Applications and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E54.02 For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Emergency Preparedness, Training, and Procedures. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Current editi
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.