iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM D6137-97(2012)

(Test Method)

Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems

Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The results obtained by this test method can be used in combination with other test methods for the selection of a lining for surfaces in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems that will be exposed to hot unscrubbed flue gas or to scrubbed gas that has been reheated well above the water dew point.  
3.1.1 This test method does not evaluate or correlate to areas within the scrubber or scrubbed gas streams at temperatures at or below the water dew point.  
3.2 This test method is intended to evaluate the combined effects of heat and exposure to sulfuric acid upon a lining system as applied to a carbon steel substrate. It does not produce the thermal gradient through the lining that may exist in actual applications. Actual lining performance may also be affected by concurrent physical or mechanical effects and other chemicals that may be present in the flue gas.  
3.3 This test method evaluates major failure modes of linings applied to square test panels that are cycled from room temperature to a designated elevated temperature.  
3.4 The recommended test temperatures of 200°F (93°C) and 350°F (177°C) are based on typical maximum operating zone temperatures in flue gas desulfurizations systems. Other temperatures may be evaluated as desired. Cycling to lower temperatures, including freezing, may be considered if applicable.  
3.5 The standard acid concentration for all tests is 20 %, recognizing that the concentration will quickly rise to the equilibrium at the selected test temperature.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended to evaluate the sulfuric acid resistance at elevated temperatures of polymer linings applied to carbon steel substrates subject to sulfuric acid attack.  
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Nov-2012
ICS
13.040.99 - Other standards related to air quality
Technical Committee
D33 - Protective Coating and Lining Work for Power Generation Facilities
Drafting Committee
D33.09 - Protective Lining for Air Quality Control Systems
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaces
ASTM D6137-97(2004) - Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
Effective Date
01-Dec-2012
Replaced By
ASTM D6137-97(2018) - Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
Effective Date
01-Aug-2018

Buy Standard

ASTM D6137-97(2012) - Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization SystemsASTM D6137-97(2012) - Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM D6137-97(2012) - Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D6137 − 97 (Reapproved 2012)
Standard Test Method for
Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas
Desulfurization Systems
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6137; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope D1474 Test Methods for Indentation Hardness of Organic
Coatings
1.1 This test method is intended to evaluate the sulfuric acid
D4138 Practices for Measurement of Dry Film Thickness of
resistance at elevated temperatures of polymer linings applied
Protective Coating Systems by Destructive, Cross-
to carbon steel substrates subject to sulfuric acid attack.
Sectioning Means
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
D4417 Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
D5162 Practice for Discontinuity (Holiday) Testing of Non-
and are not considered standard.
conductive Protective Coating on Metallic Substrates
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
2.2 Steel Structures Painting Council Standards
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
SSPC VIS 1–89 Visual Standard
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
SSPC No. SP5 Blast Cleaning to White Metal
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. 3. Significance and Use
3.1 The results obtained by this test method can be used in
2. Referenced Documents
combination with other test methods for the selection of a
2.1 ASTM Standards:
lining for surfaces in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems
A36/A36M Specification for Carbon Structural Steel
that will be exposed to hot unscrubbed flue gas or to scrubbed
C868 Test Method for Chemical Resistance of Protective
gas that has been reheated well above the water dew point.
Linings
3.1.1 Thistestmethoddoesnotevaluateorcorrelatetoareas
D660 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Checking of
within the scrubber or scrubbed gas streams at temperatures at
Exterior Paints
or below the water dew point.
D661 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Cracking of
3.2 This test method is intended to evaluate the combined
Exterior Paints
effects of heat and exposure to sulfuric acid upon a lining
D714 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Blistering of
system as applied to a carbon steel substrate. It does not
Paints
produce the thermal gradient through the lining that may exist
D772 Test Method for Evaluating Degree of Flaking (Scal-
in actual applications. Actual lining performance may also be
ing) of Exterior Paints
affected by concurrent physical or mechanical effects and other
D1186 Test Methods for Nondestructive Measurement of
chemicals that may be present in the flue gas.
Dry Film Thickness of Nonmagnetic Coatings Applied to
3.3 This test method evaluates major failure modes of
a Ferrous Base (Withdrawn 2006)
linings applied to square test panels that are cycled from room
temperature to a designated elevated temperature.
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D33 on
3.4 The recommended test temperatures of 200°F (93°C)
ProtectiveCoatingandLiningWorkforPowerGenerationFacilitiesandisthedirect
and 350°F (177°C) are based on typical maximum operating
responsibility of Subcommittee D33.09 on Protective Lining for FGD Systems.
zone temperatures in flue gas desulfurizations systems. Other
Current edition approved Dec. 1, 2012. Published December 2012. Originally
temperatures may be evaluated as desired. Cycling to lower
approved 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as D6137 – 97 (2004). DOI:
10.1520/D6137-97R12.
temperatures, including freezing, may be considered if appli-
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
cable.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
3 4
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on Available from Society for Protective Coatings (SSPC), 40 24th St., 6th Floor,
www.astm.org. Pittsburgh, PA 15222-4656, http://www.sspc.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D6137 − 97 (2012)
3.5 The standard acid concentration for all tests is 20 %, from the side and 1 in. from the top of the panel. The sixteen
recognizing that the concentration will quickly rise to the individual readings and average thickness shall be recorded.
equilibrium at the selected test temperature. 5.3.2 Test the lined surface for holidays in accordance with
Practice D5162. Mark the exact location of any holidays. If the
4. Apparatus
panel will be scribed, perform the holiday test before scribing.
4.1 ForcedAirCirculationOven,capableofmaintainingthe
Repair the holidays in accordance with the lining manufactur-
selected test temperature 64 F° (2C°). Note that acid fumes
er’s recommendations or prepare a new panel.
may damage the oven and a drip pan and protective shroud
5.4 Conditioning of Test Panels:
may be needed.
5.4.1 Condition test panels for a period of 7 days at 73 6
4.2 RackorStand, to support the test panels vertically in the
4°F (23 6 2°C). Additional conditioning of test panels,
oven while maintaining a distance of at least 1 in. (25 mm)
including longer cure times or elevated cure temperature, may
between the panels and between the panels and oven walls.
be conducted if specified. Conditioning time and temperature
shall be recorded and stated in the test report.
5. Test Specimen
6. Procedure
5.1 Substrate:
5.1.1 Test panels shall be new commercial quality, carbon
6.1 Preheat the oven to the required test temperature of
steel conforming to Specification A36/A36M. Panels shall be a
200°F (93°C) or 350°F (177°C) unless otherwise specified.
minimum of ⁄4-in. (6-mm) thick, and 8-in. (200-mm) square,
6.2 Immerse the lower portion of the test panel(s) in a 20 %
and shall have their edges broken or radiused if the lining is to
solution (by volume) of sulfuric acid at laboratory temperature
be wrapped over the edges of the panel.
of 73 6 4°F for 1 h. The upper 4 in. (10 cm.) shall remain
5.1.2 These test panels are large enough and rigid enough
above the fluid level.
for linings and coatings up to ⁄4-in. thick. For thicker linings,
6.3 Remove the test panel(s) and allow to dry for approxi-
the test panels shall be at least 32 times the lining thickness in
mately 15 min in a vertical position at laboratory temperature.
height
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM D6137-97(2018)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Sulfuric Acid Resistance of Polymer Linings for Flue Gas Desulfurization Systems

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The results obtained by this test method can be used in combination with other test methods for the selection of a lining for surfaces in flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems that will be exposed to hot unscrubbed flue gas or to scrubbed gas that has been reheated well above the water dew point.  
3.1.1 This test method does not evaluate or correlate to areas within the scrubber or scrubbed gas streams at temperatures at or below the water dew point.  
3.2 This test method is intended to evaluate the combined effects of heat and exposure to sulfuric acid upon a lining system as applied to a carbon steel substrate. It does not produce the thermal gradient through the lining that may exist in actual applications. Actual lining performance may also be affected by concurrent physical or mechanical effects and other chemicals that may be present in the flue gas.  
3.3 This test method evaluates major failure modes of linings applied to square test panels that are cycled from room temperature to a designated elevated temperature.  
3.4 The recommended test temperatures of 200°F (93°C) and 350°F (177°C) are based on typical maximum operating zone temperatures in flue gas desulfurizations systems. Other temperatures may be evaluated as desired. Cycling to lower temperatures, including freezing, may be considered if applicable.  
3.5 The standard acid concentration for all tests is 20 %, recognizing that the concentration will quickly rise to the equilibrium at the selected test temperature.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended to evaluate the sulfuric acid resistance at elevated temperatures of polymer linings applied to carbon steel substrates subject to sulfuric acid attack.  
1.2 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM C1304-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Assessing the Odor Emission of Thermal Insulation Materials

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Thermal insulating materials that produce objectionable odors could cause discomfort to persons occupying a structure insulated with such materials. Therefore, an examination to determine the odor potential of a particular insulation is desirable.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers a laboratory procedure for subjective determination of the existence, nature, and degree of odors present in all types of thermal insulation materials. This test method is not intended to evaluate the air quality aspects that any such odors may present.  
1.2 The standard test condition for material evaluated under this test method is 149 ± 1.8°F (65 ± 1°C). Standard specifications referencing this test method may require other test conditions.  
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D4532-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Respirable Dust in Workplace Atmospheres Using Cyclone Samplers

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method covers the determination of respirable dust concentration in workplace atmospheres.  
5.2 Variations of the test method are in world-wide use for determining compliance relative to occupational exposure levels.  
5.3 The test method may be used to verify dust control measures.  
5.4 The test method may also be applied in research into health effects of dust in an occupational setting.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method provides details for the determination of respirable dust concentration defined in terms of international convention in a range from 0.5 mg/m3 to 10 mg/m3 in workplace atmospheres, depending on sampling time. Specifics are given for sampling and analysis using any one of a number of commercially available cyclone samplers.  
1.2 The limitations on the test method are a minimum weight of 0.1 mg of dust on the filter, and a maximum loading dependent on sampler type and time of sampling. The test method may be used at higher loadings if the flow rate can be maintained constant.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This test method contains notes that are explanatory and are not part of the mandatory requirements of the method.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E3259-22(Practice)
Standard Practice for Process to Remove Retroviruses by Small Virus Retentive Filters

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 Mammalian cell lines are widely used in the production of biological therapeutics, such as monoclonal antibodies and other recombinant proteins. Some of these cell lines, like rodent cell lines, are known to contain genes encoding endogenous retroviral-like particles or produce endogenous retrovirus, but there is no evidence of an association between rodent retrovirus and disease in humans. Adventitious viruses can be introduced into a drug substance manufacturing process from other sources, and contamination of human therapeutics is a safety concern (3).  
3.2 Virus filtration, an orthogonal technology in a virus clearance platform to such steps as low pH or surfactant inactivation, has traditionally been accepted as a robust method for virus clearance when well designed. Size exclusion has been shown to be the primary mechanism of virus removal by virus retentive filtration, that is, larger viruses are more easily retained than smaller viruses such as parvoviruses (4, 5). Large virus retention has also been shown to be insensitive to process fluid characteristics such as protein type, protein concentration, pH, and ionic strength (4, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10). In contrast, for small viruses, aspects like flow pausing and/or flux decay can impact clearance (4, 6, 11).  
3.3 Large virus retentive filters, or retrovirus filters, are tested for removal of larger enveloped viruses like retrovirus or MuLV (80 nm to 100 nm) and have undetectable levels of the large bacteriophage PR772 (64 nm to 82 nm) (1). Small virus retentive filters, or parvovirus filters, are designed to remove parvovirus, like MMV (18 nm to 26 nm) (1). Since size exclusion has been demonstrated as the mechanism of virus retention, retroviruses, which are three to four times larger than parvoviruses, should be large enough to be completely retained, with undetectable levels of retrovirus in the filtrate, by all small virus retentive filters designed to remove parvovirus.  
3.4 Numerous published studies...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice assures 6.0 log10 removal of retrovirus (for example, MuLV).  
1.2 This practice is applicable to monoclonal antibody (mAb), immunoglobulin G (IgG) fusion proteins, recombinant proteins, or other proteins produced using mammalian cell lines (for example, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), murine hybridomas, murine myelomas, or human embryonic kidney (HEK) 293).  
1.3 The step is performed on cell-free intermediates.  
1.4 The log removal claim for retrovirus by small virus retentive filters can be used in conjunction with other clearance unit operations (for example, low pH inactivation, or inactivation of virus by surfactant) to assure sufficient total process clearance of potential virus contaminants, which would be supportive of early phase (clinical phase 1 or phase 2a trials) regulatory filings.  
1.5 Retrovirus removal claim by filtration is limited to small virus retentive filters, as defined in the PDA Technical Report Virus Filtration (1)2 in the context of this standard.  
1.6 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D6602-13(2022)e1(Practice)
Standard Practice for Sampling and Testing of Possible Carbon Black Fugitive Emissions or Other Environmental Particulate, or Both

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 There are a variety of darkening agents that contribute to air and surface contamination in industrial, urban and rural environments. Biofilms (fungal and algal), soil minerals, plant fragments, rubber fragments, metal corrosion and soot are common darkening agents. Soot is formed as an unwanted by-product of combustion and consequently varies widely with the type of fuel and combustion conditions. Carbon black, on the other hand, is purposely produced under a controlled set of conditions. Therefore, it is important to be able to distinguish carbon black from soot, as well as other environmental contaminants.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers sampling and testing for distinguishing ASTM type carbon black, in the N100 to N900 series, from other environmental particulates.  
1.2 This practice requires some degree of expertise on the part of the microscopist. For this reason, the microscopist must have adequate training and on-the-job experience in identifying the morphological parameters of carbon black and general knowledge of other particles that may be found in the environment. In support of this analysis, Donnet's book2 is highly recommended to be used as a technical reference for recognizing and understanding the microstructure of carbon black.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    22 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E3261-21(Guide)
Standard Guide for Odor Evaluation of Products and Materials Under Controlled Conditions With Trained Panel

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This guide provides general guidelines and recommendations for presenting product and material samples to assessors for evaluation of odor attributes under controlled conditions. Specific situations may require variations to these guidelines.  
5.2 This guide is designed for use in assessing odor of products and materials for such applications as, but not limited to, development, reformulation, complaint investigation, quality control, and stability/shelf-life.  
5.3 Elements of this guide may also be utilized for assessor training programs involving odor evaluation tasks.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide provides guidelines for odor evaluation of products and materials under controlled conditions with a trained panel.  
1.2 This guide addresses odor, aroma, malodor and fragrance (see Terminology E253).  
1.3 This guide addresses assessor selection and training, sample preparation, and test procedures specific to odor evaluations.  
1.4 This guide does not address odor of any specific category of products.  
1.5 This guide does not recommend a specific testing method. The user is responsible for identifying the most appropriate test design and analysis tools to address the research questions.  
1.6 Units—The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.7 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.8 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    10 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2914/E2914M-21(Practice)
Standard Practice for Ultrasonic Extraction of Lead from Composited Wipe Samples

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This practice is for use in the preparation of no more than four wipe samples collected from equally-sized areas in the same space combined to form a composited sample for subsequent determination of lead content.  
5.2 This practice assumes use of wipes that meet Specification E1792 and should not be used unless the wipes meet Specification E1792.  
5.3 This practice is capable of preparing samples for determination of lead bound within paint dust.  
5.4 This practice may not be capable of preparing samples for determination of lead bound within silica or silicate matrices, or within matrices not soluble in nitric acid.  
5.5 Adjustment of the nitric acid concentration or acid strength, or both, of the final extract solution may be necessary for compatibility with the instrumental analysis method to be used for lead quantification.  
5.6 This sample preparation practice has not been validated for use and must be validated by the user prior to using the practice for client samples.
Note 1: Each combination of wipes (two wipes, three wipes, and four wipes) constitutes a different matrix and must be separately validated.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the extraction of lead (Pb) using ultrasonication, heat and nitric acid from a composited sample of up to four individual wipe samples of settled dust collected from equally-sized areas in the same space.  
1.2 This practice contains notes which are explanatory and not part of mandatory requirements of the practice.  
1.3 This practice should be used by analysts experienced in digestion techniques such as hot blocks. Like all procedures used in an analytical laboratory, this practice needs to be validated for use and shown to produce acceptable results before being applied to client samples.  
1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E2913/E2913M-21(Practice)
Standard Practice for Hotplate Digestion of Lead from Composited Wipe Samples

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This practice is for use in the preparation of no more than four wipe samples combined to form a composited sample for subsequent determination of lead content.  
5.2 This practice assumes use of wipes that meet Specification E1792 and should not be used unless the wipes meet Specification E1792.  
5.3 This practice is capable of preparing samples for determination of lead bound within paint dust.  
5.4 This practice may not be capable of preparing samples for determination of lead bound within silica or silicate matrices, or within matrices not soluble in nitric acid.  
5.5 Adjustment of the nitric acid concentration or acid strength, or both, of the final extract solution may be necessary for compatibility with the instrumental analysis method to be used for lead quantification.  
5.6 This sample preparation practice has not been validated for use and must be validated by the user prior to using the practice for client samples.
Note 1: Each combination of wipes (two wipes, three wipes, and four wipes) constitutes a different matrix and must be separately validated.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice is similar to Practice E1644 and covers the hot, nitric acid digestion of lead (Pb) from a composited sample of up to four individual wipe samples of settled dust collected from equally-sized areas in the same space.  
1.2 This practice contains notes which are explanatory and not part of mandatory requirements of the practice.  
1.3 This practice should be used by analysts experienced in digestion techniques such as hot blocks. Like all procedures used in an analytical laboratory, this practice needs to be validated for use and shown to produce acceptable results before being applied to client samples.  
1.4 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D6552-06(2021)(Practice)
Standard Practice for Controlling and Characterizing Errors in Weighing Collected Aerosols

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 The weighing of collected aerosol is one of the most common and purportedly simple analytical procedures in both occupational and environmental atmospheric monitoring (for example, Test Method D4532 or D4096). Problems with measurement accuracy occur when the amount of material collected is small, owing both to balance inaccuracy and variation in the weight of that part of the sampling medium that is weighed along with the sample. The procedures presented here for controlling and documenting such analytical errors will help provide the accuracy required for making well-founded decisions in identifying, characterizing, and controlling hazardous conditions.  
4.2 Recommendations are given as to materials to be used. Means of controlling or correcting errors arising from instability are provided. Recommendations as to the weighing procedure are given. Finally, a method evaluation procedure for estimating weighing errors is described.  
4.3 Recommendations are also provided for the reporting of weights relative to LOD (see 3.2.6) and LOQ (see 3.2.7). The quantities, LOD and LOQ, are computed as a result of the method evaluation.
SCOPE
1.1 Assessment of airborne aerosol hazards in the occupational setting entails sampling onto a collection medium followed by analysis of the collected material. The result is generally an estimated concentration of a possibly hazardous material in the air. The uncertainty in such estimates depends on several factors, one of which relates to the specific type of analysis employed. The most commonly applied method for analysis of aerosols is the weighing of the sampled material. Gravimetric analysis, though apparently simple, is subject to errors from instability in the mass of the sampling medium and other elements that must be weighed. An example is provided by aerosol samplers designed to collect particles so as to agree with the inhalable aerosol sampling convention (see ISO 7708, Guide D6062, and EN 481). For some sampler types, filter and cassette are weighed together to make estimates. Therefore, if the cassette, for example, absorbs or loses water between the weighings required for a concentration estimation, then errors may arise. This practice covers such potential errors and provides solutions for their minimization.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    9 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1644-21(Practice)
Standard Practice for Hot Plate Digestion of Dust Wipe Samples for the Determination of Lead

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This practice is intended for the digestion of lead in dust wipe samples collected during various lead hazard activities performed in and around buildings and related structures.  
5.2 This practice is also intended for the digestion of lead in dust wipe samples collected during and after building renovations.  
5.3 This practice is applicable to the digestion of dust wipe samples that have or have not been collected in accordance with Practice E1728/E1728M using wipes that may or may not conform to Specification E1792.  
5.4 This practice is applicable to the digestion of dust wipe samples that were placed in either hard-walled, rigid containers such as 50-mL centrifuge tubes or flexible plastic bags.
Note 2: Due to the difficulty in performing quantitative transfers of some samples from plastic bags, hard-walled rigid containers such as 50-mL plastic centrifuge tubes are recommended in Practice E1728/E1728M for sample collection.  
5.5 Digestates prepared according to this practice are intended to be analyzed for lead concentration using spectrometric techniques such as Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectrometry (ICP-AES) and Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry (FAAS) (see Test Methods E1613, E3193, and E3203), or using electrochemical techniques such as anodic stripping voltammetry (see Practice E2051).  
5.6 This practice is not capable of determining lead bound within matrices, such as silica, that are not soluble in nitric acid.  
5.7 This practice is capable of determining lead bound within paint.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the acid digestion of surface dust samples (collected using wipe sampling practices) and associated quality control (QC) samples for the determination of lead.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.2.1 Exception—Informational inch-pound units are provided in Note 3.  
1.3 This practice contains notes which are explanatory and not part of mandatory requirements of the standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off