SIST ISO 8423:1996/C1:1996
(Corrigendum)ISO 8423:1991/Cor 1:1993
ISO 8423:1991/Cor 1:1993
Amends values in table 1 and subclause C.2.3 and equations in subclauses 3.2.2.1 and 3.2.3.1.
Plans d'échantillonnage progressif pour le contrôle par mesures des pourcentages de non conformes (écart-type connu) — Rectificatif technique 1
Sequential sampling plans for inspection by variables for percent nonconforming (known standard deviation) - Technical corrigendum 1
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Sequential sampling plans for inspection by variables for percent nonconforming (known standard deviation) - Technical corrigendum 1ISO 8423:1991/Cor 1:199303.120.30Application of statistical methodsICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:ISO 8423:1991/Cor 1:1993SIST ISO 8423:1996/C1:1996en01-september-1996SIST ISO 8423:1996/C1:1996SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
SIST ISO 8423:1996/C1:1996
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 8423:1991 --/u/llx\- TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 +Iso; ÖLS Published 1993-09-01 INTERNATIONAL OAGANUATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ME~YHAPO~HAR OPrAHl43ALlHR n0 CTAH~APTH3AL&lH. ORGANlSAllON INlERNATlONALE DE NORMALISATlON Sequential sampling Plans for ~inspection by variables for percent nonconforming (known Standard deviation) TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1 Plans dkhantillonnage progressif pour Ie contrGle par mesures des pourcentages non conformes (Ecart-type connu) RECTIFlCATlF TECHN
...
This May Also Interest You
This document provides detailed descriptions of statistical methods for proficiency testing providers to use to design proficiency testing schemes and to analyse the data obtained from those schemes. This document provides recommendations on the interpretation of proficiency testing data by participants in such proficiency testing schemes and by accreditation bodies.
The procedures in this document can be applied to demonstrate that the measurement results obtained by laboratories, inspection bodies, and individuals meet specified criteria for acceptable performance.
This document is applicable to proficiency testing where the results reported are either quantitative measurements or qualitative observations on test items.
NOTE The procedures in this document can also be applied for the assessment of expert opinion where the opinions or judgments are reported in a form which can be compared objectively with an independent reference value or a consensus statistic. For example, when classifying proficiency test items into known categories by inspection - or in determining by inspection whether proficiency test items arise, or do not arise, from the same original source - and the classification results are compared objectively, the provisions of this document that relate to nominal (qualitative) properties can be applied.
- Standard100 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard93 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard100 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This document specifies single sampling plans for lot-by-lot inspection under the following conditions:
a) where the inspection procedure is applied to a continuing series of lots of discrete products, all supplied by one producer using one production process;
b) where only a single quality characteristic, x, of these products is taken into consideration, which is measurable on a continuous scale;
c) where production is under statistical control and the quality characteristic, x, is distributed according to a normal distribution or a close approximation to the normal distribution;
d) where a contract or standard defines a lower specification limit, L, an upper specification limit, U, or both. An item is qualified as conforming if its measured quality characteristic, x, satisfies as appropriate one of the following inequalities:
1) x ≥ L (i.e. the lower specification limit is not violated);
2) x ≤ U (i.e. the upper specification limit is not violated);
3) x ≥ L and x ≤ U (i.e. neither the lower nor the upper specification limit is violated).
Inequalities 1) and 2) are cases with a single specification limit, and 3) is a case with double specification limits.
Where double specification limits apply, it is assumed in this document that conformity to both specification limits is equally important to the integrity of the product. In such cases, it is appropriate to apply a single AQL to the combined percentage of a product outside the two specification limits. This is referred to as combined control.
- Standard114 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard107 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard110 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This document describes the steps for conducting short-term performance studies that are typically performed on machines (including devices, appliances, apparatuses) where parts produced consecutively under repeatability conditions are considered. The number of observations to be analysed vary according to the patterns the data produce, or if the runs (the rate at which items are produced) on the machine are low in quantity. The methods are not considered suitable where the sample size produced is less than 30 observations. Methods for handling the data and carrying out the calculations are described. In addition, machine performance indices and the actions required at the conclusion of a machine performance study are described.
This document is not applicable when tool wear patterns are expected to be present during the duration of the study, nor if autocorrelation between observations is present. The situation where a machine has captured the data, sometimes thousands of data points collected in a minute, is not considered suitable for the application of this document.
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard19 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Draft19 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Draft17 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document establishes single sampling plans for conformance testing, i.e., for assessing whether the quality level of a relevant audit population (lot, process, inventory, file etc) conforms to a declared value. Sampling plans are provided corresponding to four levels of discriminatory ability. The limiting quality ratio (LQR) (see Clause 4) of each sampling plan is given for reference. For levels I-III, the sampling plans have been devised so as to obtain a risk no more than 5 % of contradicting a correct declared quality level. The risk of failing to contradict an incorrectly declared quality level which is related to the LQR is no more than 10 %. The sample sizes for level 0 are designed in a way that the LQR factors of the sampling plans are compatible with the LQR factors for level I.
In contrast to the procedures in the other parts of the ISO 2859 series, the procedures in this document are not applicable to acceptance assessment of lots. Generally, this document mainly focuses on controlling type I error, which differs from the balancing of the risks in the procedures for acceptance sampling.
This document can be used for various forms of quality inspection in situations where objective evidence of conformity to some declared quality level is to be provided by means of inspection of a sample. The procedures are applicable to entities such as lots, process output, etc. that allow random samples of individual items to be taken from the entity.
The sampling plans provided in this document are applicable, but not limited, to the inspection of a variety of targets such as:
— end items;
— components and raw materials;
— operations;
— materials in process;
— supplies in storage;
— maintenance operations;
— data or records;
— administrative procedures;
— accounting procedures or accounting entries;
— internal control procedures.
This document considers two types of quality models for discrete items and populations, as follows.
i) The conforming-nonconforming model, where each item is classified as conforming or nonconforming, and where the quality indicator of a population of items is the proportion p of nonconforming items, or, equivalently, the percentage 100 p of nonconforming items.
ii) The nonconformities model, where the number of nonconformities is counted on each item, and where the quality indicator of a population of items is the average number λ of nonconformities found on items in the population, or, equivalently, the percentage 100 λ of nonconformities on items in the population.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard18 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard19 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Draft18 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies an acceptance sampling system for inspection by attributes indexed by limiting quality (LQ). The sampling system is used for lots in isolation (isolated sequences of lots, an isolated lot, a unique lot or a short series of lots), where switching rules, such as those of ISO 2859‑1, are not applicable. Inspection levels, as provided by ISO 2859‑1 to control the relative amount of inspection, are not provided in this document. In many industrial situations, in which switching rules might be used, they are not applied for a number of reasons, not all of which might be valid:
a) production is intermittent (not continuous);
b) production is from several different sources in varying quantities, i.e. "job lots";
c) lots are isolated;
d) lots are resubmitted after inspection.
The sampling plans in this document are indexed by a series of specified values of limiting quality (LQ), where the consumer's risk (the probability of acceptance at the LQ) is usually below 0,10 (10 %), except in some instances.
This document is intended both for inspection for nonconforming items and for inspection for nonconformities per 100 items.
It is intended to be used when the supplier and the consumer both regard the lot to be in isolation. That is, the lot is unique in that it is the only one of its type produced. It can also be used when there is a series of lots too short for switching rules to be applied.
- Standard50 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard46 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard46 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard2 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
- Amendment5 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
This document presents key elements and the philosophy of the control chart approach, and identifies a wide variety of control charts (including those related to the Shewhart control chart, those stressing process acceptance or online process adjustment, and specialized control charts).
It presents an overview of the basic principles and concepts of control charts and illustrates the relationship among various control chart approaches to aid in the selection of the most appropriate part of ISO 7870 for given circumstances. It does not specify statistical control methods using control charts. These methods are specified in the relevant parts of ISO 7870.
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard19 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard20 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
1.1 This document
— specifies basic methods for estimating the bias of a measurement method and the laboratory bias when a measurement method is applied;
— provides a practical approach of a basic method for routine use in estimating the bias of measurement methods and laboratory bias;
— provides a brief guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the measurements for estimating bias.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the measurement result, although the single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 This document applies when the measurement method has been standardized and all measurements are carried out according to that measurement method.
NOTE In ISO/IEC Guide 99:2007(VIM), "measurement procedure" (2.6) is an analogous term related to the term "measurement method" used in this document.
1.4 This document applies only if an accepted reference value can be established to substitute the true value by using the value, for example:
— of a suitable reference material;
— of a suitable measurement standard;
— referring to a suitable measurement method;
— of a suitable prepared known sample.
1.5 This document applies only to the cases where it is sufficient to estimate bias on one property at a time. It is not applicable if the bias in the measurement of one property is affected by the level of any other property (i.e. it does not consider interferences by any influencing quantity). Comparison of the trueness of two-measurement methods is considered in ISO 5725-6.
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard27 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
1.1 This document
— amplifies the general principles for designing experiments for the numerical estimation of the precision of measurement methods by means of a collaborative interlaboratory experiment;
— provides a detailed practical description of the basic method for routine use in estimating the precision of measurement methods;
— provides guidance to all personnel concerned with designing, performing or analysing the results of the tests for estimating precision.
NOTE Modifications to this basic method for particular purposes are given in other parts of ISO 5725.
1.2 It is concerned exclusively with measurement methods which yield measurements on a continuous scale and give a single value as the test result, although this single value can be the outcome of a calculation from a set of observations.
1.3 It assumes that in the design and performance of the precision experiment, all the principles as laid down in ISO 5725-1 are observed. The basic method uses the same number of test results in each laboratory, with each laboratory analysing the same levels of test sample; i.e. a balanced uniform-level experiment. The basic method applies to procedures that have been standardized and are in regular use in a number of laboratories.
1.4 The statistical model of ISO 5725-1:1994, Clause 5, is accepted as a suitable basis for the interpretation and analysis of the test results, the distribution of which is approximately normal.
1.5 The basic method, as described in this document, (usually) estimates the precision of a measurement method:
a) when it is required to determine the repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations as defined in ISO 5725-1;
b) when the materials to be used are homogeneous, or when the effects of heterogeneity can be included in the precision values; and
c) when the use of a balanced uniform-level layout is acceptable.
1.6 The same approach can be used to make a preliminary estimate of precision for measurement methods which have not reached standardization or are not in routine use.
- Standard69 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard75 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard73 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This International Standard provides a general introduction to acceptance sampling by attributes and
provides a brief summary of the attribute sampling schemes and plans used in ISO 2859-1, ISO 2859-2,
ISO 2859-3, ISO 2859-4 and ISO 2859-5, which describe specific types of attribute sampling systems.
It also provides guidance on the selection of the appropriate inspection system for use in a particular
situation.
- Standard11 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for×1 day
- Standard11 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.