SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003
(Main)Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the ISDN; End-to-end protocol tests (Interconnection capability testing)
- Abstract
Specifies interconnection capability, testing (Part 1) and conformance testing (Part 2) for facsimile Group 4, class 1 equipment on the ISDN
- Status
- Published
- Publication Date
- 30-Nov-2003
- Current Stage
- 6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
- Start Date
- 01-Dec-2003
- Due Date
- 01-Dec-2003
- Completion Date
- 01-Dec-2003
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 is the Slovenian adoption of ETS 300 155 Edition 1, published by SIST, for end-to-end protocol tests for Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment. It specifies how to check interconnection capability on the ISDN, with a focus on session and application-layer behavior that matters when two fax terminals set up a call, exchange document data, and clear the connection.
This standard is intended for equipment makers, test laboratories, and approval teams that need a common test basis for ISDN facsimile interoperability. It gives the test structure, the protocol data units to use, and the PICS and PIXIT material needed to describe an implementation before testing.
What does SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 specify?
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 specifies interconnection capability testing for facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the ISDN. Clause 1 places the focus on basic intercommunication, not on the lower layers below the Transport layer.
The document is organized into a short main body and five annexes. Clause 4 covers session tests, clause 5 covers application layer tests, Annex A lists modified Session Protocol Data Unit (SPDU) cases, Annex B gives the application layer Abstract Test Suite, Annex C gives the PICS proformas, Annex D gives the PIXIT proformas, and Annex E is a bibliography.
| Annex | What it covers |
|---|---|
| Annex A | Session Protocol Data Unit (SPDU) list and valid cases for session and document protocol elements |
| Annex B | Application layer Abstract Test Suite, including tester sending and tester receiving views |
| Annex C | Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proformas for Session/Presentation and Application layers |
| Annex D | Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proformas for Session/Presentation and Application layers |
| Annex E | Bibliography |
What are the key requirements of SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003?
The main requirement is that the equipment under test shall be exercised with the CCITT Recommendation T.64 test material, but with the modifications and exclusions stated in this ETS. In practice, that means the standard does not simply repeat T.64 - it adapts it to what is appropriate for group 4 class 1 facsimile terminals.
Session and document tests
Clause 4.1 says the session function tests from CCITT Recommendation T.64, Annex C, shall be performed with modified SPDU tables from Annex A of this ETS. Several session cases are excluded because they relate to non-basic terminal capabilities that are not appropriate for group 4 class 1 facsimile terminals. Clause 4.1 also corrects a typographical error in T.64 for test DE 0/2.
Clause 4.2 applies the same approach to document function tests. The document-side SPDU tables from T.64 are replaced by the tables in this ETS, and some cases are excluded for the same reason of non-basic terminal capability. In practice, this tells a test laboratory which message sequences to verify and which ones to leave out for this class of equipment.
Application service tests
Clause 4.3 uses the application service tests from T.64, Annex D, but with named exceptions and partial cases. The standard lists tests that shall not be performed, and it limits MD 2 to Part A only. For a reader planning a test program, this is the part that shows which application-layer behaviors are in scope for interconnection capability testing and which ones are outside that scope.
Abstract Test Suite for the application layer
Clause 5 points to Annex B, which contains the Application layer Abstract Test Suite. Annex B is split into tester sending/IUT receiving and tester receiving/IUT sending views, with operational tests, a tolerance test, and PDU lists. It also says that only tests 1, 7, 8 and 9 are mandatory, while the others depend on PICS declarations. This matters because the equipment supplier must declare what is implemented before the laboratory can select the right tests.
PICS and PIXIT information
Annex C requires a Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) for each layer to be tested, and Annex D requires a PIXIT for each layer. Annex C explains how to fill in the tables, how items are identified, and how mandatory, optional, and not-applicable-for-type-approval items are marked. Annex D says the extra testing information shall not conflict with the PICS or with the requirements of the standards. In practice, the PICS and PIXIT are the starting point for any conformance or approval test campaign.
Capabilities, timers, and protocol behavior
Annex C includes the session/presentation and application-layer capability tables that describe major functions such as session establishment and clearing, document information transfer, document control, and document error recovery. It also includes timer items, including the basic inactivity timer and the basic demand response timer, both shown with a 60 second value, and a negotiated inactivity timer range expressed in seconds, minutes, or hours. This is the material a test house uses to verify negotiated behavior and timeout handling.
Error handling and control procedures
The protocol procedure tables in Annex C cover behavior such as use of session user data, release of the transport connection on timeout, handling of CDCL and RDPBN, stop-sending at the window limit, and reactions to invalid or unexpected PDUs. For an implementer, this is where the standard turns protocol theory into testable call flows and error responses.
What terms does SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 define?
- Interconnection Capability Tests (ITC) - A subset of capability and behavior testing that checks whether two implementations can interwork at the basic communication level.
- Implementation Under Test (IUT) - The equipment being tested.
- Session Protocol Data Unit (SPDU) - A session-layer protocol element used in the test cases.
- Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) - The completed declaration of which capabilities and options an implementation provides.
- Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) - Additional implementation information needed to run the tests.
- Data Transfer Access Management (DTAM) - A term used in the document’s protocol and PIXIT material for application-layer control functions.
- ISDN - Integrated Services Digital Network, the network environment for the facsimile equipment covered by this ETS.
Who uses SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003?
Test laboratories use SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 to run end-to-end protocol tests on ISDN facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment. Manufacturers and approval teams use it to prepare PICS and PIXIT statements, select the applicable cases, and verify that the implementation follows the expected session and application-layer behavior.
It is also used by quality managers and technical buyers who need to confirm that a product is tested against the same protocol framework as other ISDN fax equipment. The standard is especially relevant where DTE-DTE communication over ISDN basic access and circuit-switched mode must be demonstrated.
What changed in SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 from the previous edition?
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 is identical to ETS 300 155 Edition 1. The document history in the source shows this as the first edition.
Which standards are used with SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003?
- CCITT Recommendation T.64 - provides the base conformance testing procedure that this ETS adapts throughout the session, document, and application tests.
- ISO/IEC 9646-1 - gives the general conformance testing concepts used for PICS and PIXIT structure.
- ISO/IEC 9646-2 - provides the abstract test suite specification framework.
- CCITT Recommendation T.62 - supplies the control procedures for teletex and Group 4 facsimile service that the test cases rely on.
- ITU-T Recommendation T.503 - defines the document application profile used in the PICS and application-layer material.
- ITU-T Recommendation T.521 - defines the communication application profile BT0 for the session service.
- CCITT Recommendation T.563 - provides terminal characteristics for group 4 facsimile apparatus.
- CCITT Recommendation F.184 - provides operational provisions for the international public facsimile service.
- ETS 300 080 - covers the lower-layer protocols up to and including the Transport layer, which are outside the scope of the tests here.
- ETS 300 280 - is the related terminal-testing ETS and is referenced for companion PICS items.
What does the SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 document contain?
The document contains the core test clauses, modified SPDU tables, and annexed tables used to drive interoperability checks. Annex A gives valid cases for session and document protocol elements such as CSS, RSSP, RSSN, CDS, CDC, CDE, RDEP, CDPB, RDPBP, RDPBN, CDCL, RDCLP, CDUI, and RDGR.
Annex B contains the application layer Abstract Test Suite, including tester sending and tester receiving test views, PDU translations, and lists of PDUs. Annex C contains the PICS proformas for the session/presentation and application layers, with guidance on how to declare implemented items and how to mark mandatory or optional capabilities.
Annex D contains the PIXIT proformas, including client information for test control, observation, and coordination. The document also includes a bibliography and a history section, which help a reader trace the test framework and the publication background.
Get Certified
Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard
ANCE
Mexican certification and testing association.
Intertek Slovenia
Intertek testing, inspection, and certification services in Slovenia.
LNE (Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais)
French national laboratory for metrology and testing.
Sponsored listings
Frequently Asked Questions
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 is a standard published by the Slovenian Institute for Standardization (SIST). Its full title is "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the ISDN; End-to-end protocol tests (Interconnection capability testing)". This standard covers: Specifies interconnection capability, testing (Part 1) and conformance testing (Part 2) for facsimile Group 4, class 1 equipment on the ISDN
Specifies interconnection capability, testing (Part 1) and conformance testing (Part 2) for facsimile Group 4, class 1 equipment on the ISDN
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 33.080 - Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN). The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.
SIST ETS 300 155 E1:2003 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2003
Digitalno omrežje z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN) – Oprema za faksimilno skupino
4, razred 1, v sistemu ISDN –Preskusi po protokolu konec-konec (preskušanje
zmožnosti medsebojnega povezovanja)
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the
ISDN; End-to-end protocol tests (Interconnection capability testing)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ETS 300 155 Edition 1
ICS:
33.080 Digitalno omrežje z Integrated Services Digital
integriranimi storitvami Network (ISDN)
(ISDN)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
EUROPEAN ETS 300 155
TELECOMMUNICATION February 1995
STANDARD
Source: ETSI TC-TE Reference: T/TE 05-08
ICS: 33.080
ISDN, facsimile
Key words:
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN);
Facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the ISDN
End-to-end protocol tests
(Interconnection capability testing)
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Postal address:
650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
Office address:
c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - secretariat@etsi.fr
X.400: Internet:
Tel.: +33 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1995. All rights reserved.
New presentation - see History box
Page 2
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.
Page 3
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Contents
Foreword .5
1 Scope .7
2 Normative references.7
3 Definitions and abbreviations .8
3.1 Definitions .8
3.2 Abbreviations .8
4 Session tests.8
4.1 Session function tests.9
4.2 Document function tests .9
4.3 Application service tests .10
5 Application layer tests.10
Annex A (normative): Session Protocol Data Unit (SPDU) list.11
A.1 Session protocol element.11
Table A.1: < CSS > Session protocol element (Valid cases).12
Table A.2: < RSSP > Session protocol element (Valid cases) .14
Table A.3: < RSSN > Session protocol element (Valid cases).17
Table A.4: < CSE > Session protocol element (Valid cases).20
Table A.5: < RSEP > Session protocol element (Valid cases) .20
Table A.6: < CSA > Session protocol element (Valid cases).21
Table A.7: < RSAP > Session protocol element (Valid cases) .21
Table A.8: < CSUI > Session protocol element (Valid cases) .22
Table A.9: < RSUI > Session protocol element (Valid cases) .22
A.2 Document protocol element .23
Table A.10: < CDS > Document protocol element (Valid cases).24
Table A.11: < CDC > Document protocol element (Valid cases) .26
Table A.12: < CDE > Document protocol element (Valid cases).27
Table A.13: < RDEP > Document protocol element (Valid cases) .27
Table A.14: < CDPB > Document protocol element (Valid cases) .28
Table A.15: < RDPBP > Document protocol element (valid cases) .28
Table A.16: < RDPBN > Document protocol element (Valid cases).29
Table A.17: < CDCL > Document protocol element (Valid cases) .30
Table A.18: < RDCLP > Document protocol element (Valid cases).31
Table A.19: < CDUI > Document protocol element (Valid cases) .33
Table A.20: < RDGR > Document protocol element (Valid cases).33
A.3 Session layer tests .34
Annex B (normative): Application layer Abstract Test Suite.38
B.1 Tester sending, IUT receiving .38
B.1.1 Operational tests.38
B.1.2 Tolerance test .38
B.1.3 List of tests.39
Page 4
ETS 300 155: February 1995
B.2 Tester receiving, IUT sending. 44
B.2.1 Operational tests . 44
B.2.2 Translation of PDUs (in subclause B.1.2) . 44
B.2.3 Realization of PDUs at communications port. 44
B.2.4 List of PDUs . 45
Table B.1: S_CONreq . 45
Table B.2: S_CAPreq_cmd. 46
Table B.3: S_DATA_req (data_default) . 47
Table B.4: S_DATA_req (data_density). 48
Table B.5: S_DATA_req (data_paper_format). 49
Table B.6: S_DATA_req (data_compression). 50
Table B.7: S_DATA_req (data_combined) . 51
Table B.8: S_DATA_req (data_default_value_list) . 52
Table B.9: S_DATA_req (data_identifiers). 53
Table B.10: S_DATA_req (data_image_options). 54
Table B.11: S_DATA_req (data_length_txt_unit). 55
Annex C (normative): Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS). 56
C.1 Introduction. 56
C.2 References . 56
C.3 PICS proforma contents and structure . 56
C.4 Preprinted table contents. 56
C.5 Table/item identification. 57
C.6 Guidance for completion. 57
C.7 Session/Presentation layer PICS. 58
C.8 Application layer PICS . 63
Annex D (normative): Protocol Implementation Extra Information for Testing (PIXIT). 65
D.1 Introduction. 65
D.2 References . 65
D.3 PIXIT proforma contents and structure . 65
D.4 Table/item identification. 65
D.5 Guidance for completion. 65
D.6 Session/Presentation layer PIXIT. 66
D.7 Application layer PIXIT . 68
Annex E (informative): Bibliography . 70
History. 71
Page 5
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Foreword
This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) was produced by the Terminal Equipment (TE)
Technical Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
The text provides detailed conformance tests for equipment offering group 4 class 1 functionality and is
based upon CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1] and ISO 9646 Parts 1 [2] and 2 [3].
This ETS is also closely related to a series of other ETSs which are given in clause 1 (Scope).
Transposition dates
Date of latest announcement of this ETS (doa): 31 May 1995
Date of latest publication of new National Standard
or endorsement of this ETS (dop/e): 30 November 1995
Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 30 November 1995
Page 6
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Blank page
Page 7
ETS 300 155: February 1995
1 Scope
This ETS contains the details of the Interconnection Capability Tests (ITC) for equipment offering group 4
class 1 facsimile functionality. It is based upon CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1] and ISO 9646, Parts 1
[2] and 2 [3].
The concept of the Interconnection Capability Tests (ITC) is derived from the range of test types defined in
CCITT Recommendation X.290. ITC is a subset of the "capability and behaviour" types of test and
focuses on checking the basic intercommunication process.
NOTE: Full conformance testing is for further study.
This ETS is closely related to the following ETSs on group 4 class 1 facsimile equipment.
ETS 300 080 [9]: "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - ISDN lower layer protocols for
telematic terminals".
ETS 300 112: "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Facsimile group 4 class 1
equipment on the ISDN - End-to-end protocols".
ETS 300 087: "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - Facsimile group 4 class 1
equipment on the ISDN - Functional specification of the equipment".
ETS 300 280: "Terminal Equipment (TE) - Facsimile group 4 class 1 equipment on the
Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) Terminal - testing".
2 Normative references
This ETS incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications. These
normative references are cited at the appropriated places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications
apply to this ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the latest
edition of the publication referred to applies.
[1] CCITT Recommendation T.64 (1988): "Conformance testing procedure for the
teletex Recommendations".
[2] ISO/IEC 9646-1 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework, Part 1:
General concepts".
[3] ISO/IEC 9646-2 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework, Part 2:
Abstract test suite specification".
[4] CCITT Recommendation T.62 (1988): "Control procedures for teletex and
Group 4 facsimile service".
[5] ITU-T Recommendation T.503 (1991): "A document application profile for the
interchange of group 4 facsimile documents".
[6] ITU-T Recommendation T.521 (1992): "Communication application profile BT0
for document bulk transfer based on the session service (according to the rules
defined in T.62 bis)".
[7] CCITT Recommendation T.563 (1988): "Terminal characteristics for group 4
facsimile apparatus".
Page 8
ETS 300 155: February 1995
[8] CCITT Recommendation F.184 (1988): "Operational provisions for the
international public facsimile service between subscriber stations with group 4
facsimile machines (telefax 4)".
[9] ETS 300 080 (1992): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN) - ISDN lower
layer protocols for telematic terminals".
3 Definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this ETS, the definitions given in CCITT/ITU-T Recommendations T.62 [4], T.64 [1],
T.503 [5], T.521 [6], T.563 [7] and F.184 [8] apply. However, for the purposes of this ETS group 4
facsimile terminal equipment is referred to as the "facsimile equipment".
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this ETS, the abbreviations given are those stated in the relevant CCITT/ITU-T
Recommendations (T.62 [4], T.64 [1], T.503 [5], T.521 [6], T.563 [7] and F.184 [8]) and ETS 300 280 plus
the following:
DTAM Data Transfer Access Management
ITC Interconnection Capability Tests
IUT Implementation Under Test
ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
SPDU Session Protocol Data Unit
4 Session tests
Tests for the lower layers of the protocol, up to and including the Transport layer, are contained in ETS
300 080 [9].
Tests for the session functions are given in subclause 4.1, for the document functions in subclause 4.2
and for the application service functions in subclause 4.3.
Page 9
ETS 300 155: February 1995
4.1 Session function tests
The following tests detailed in CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1], annex C, shall be performed with the
following modifications:
the tables of SPDUs for commands and responses:
CSS,
RSSP,
RSSN,
CSE,
RSEP,
CSUI,
RSUI,
shall be replaced by the modified tables given in annex A of this ETS.
The following tests shall not be performed as they are concerned with "non-basic terminal capabilities"
which are not appropriate to group 4 class 1 facsimile terminals:
CDN 1/0;
CGN 0/0;
CGN 0/1;
CGN 0/2;
CGN 0/3;
CGN 91/0.
The following test has a typographical error in CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1]:
DE 0/2 calls for the tester to issue CDS I1-I7, this should read CSS I1-I7.
4.2 Document function tests
The tests detailed in CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1], annex C (normative), shall be performed with the
following modifications:
the tables of SPDUs for commands and responses:
CDS,
CDCL,
RDCLP,
CDC,
CDE,
RDEP,
CDPB,
RDPBP,
CDUI,
shall be replaced by the modified tables contained in this ETS.
The following tests shall not be performed as they are concerned with "non-basic terminal capabilities"
which are not appropriate to group 4 class 1 terminals:
CDN 21/1;
CDN 21/2;
CDN 21/3;
CDN 21/4.
Page 10
ETS 300 155: February 1995
4.3 Application service tests
The tests detailed in CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1], annex D (normative), shall be performed with the
following exceptions:
MG 4;
MG 5;
MG 6.
Of tests MD 2 only Part (A) shall be performed and note 2 is not applicable.
MD 3
MD 4
MD 5
MD 6
MD 8
MD 9
MD 10
MD 11
CG 1
CG 2
CG 3
CG 4
CD 1
CD 2
CD 3
CD 4
CD 5
ED 4
ED 7
5 Application layer tests
Annex B (normative) contains the Abstract Test Suite for the application layer.
Page 11
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Annex A (normative): Session Protocol Data Unit (SPDU) list
See CCITT Recommendation T.64 [1] for an introduction to, and explanation of, the terminology used.
In the tables, figures underlined represent number of characters not values.
A.1 Session protocol element
Table Protocol element
A.1 CSS Command Session Start
A.2 RSSP Response Session Start Positive
A.3 RSSN Response Session Start Negative
A.4 CSE Command Session End
A.5 RSEP Response Session End Positive
A.6 CSA Command Session Abort
A.7 RSAP Session protocol element
A.8 CSUI Command Session User Information
A.9 RSUI Response Session User Information
Page 12
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.1: < CSS > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Command Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Session user Priv Non-
Session Servi Inact Session basic data -ate std
Start (CSS) Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce -ive service term use capab
ID & ref capab -w ID timer funct. capab
time PV
Tester C L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P Not G L A4,06 G L P L P
sends I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V used I I 80,01 I I I I V
0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 0 04 in G4 C 0 02,81 E x E x x
D x 1 x A 8 4 B 8 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 2 x x 4 2 39 Cl 1 1 8 01,00 x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M fax M M M
V1 With all 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 0 04 The same SUD E x E x x
defined 4 4 is used for
parameters D x 1 x A 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 2 x x 4 2 39 all PDUs x x 8 x x
V2 With P12 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 0 04 E x
4 4
p. ex. D x 1 x A 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1 2 x x 4 2 39 x x
V3 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0
P OC and 4 4
PG 02 D x 1 x A 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1
V4 LI defn 0Fxx 0Fxx 0F012 0F001 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
on 3 4 4
octets DFxx 1Fxx AF08 BF0E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1
Table A.1: < CSS > Session protocol element (Valid cases) (concluded)
Command Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Session user Priv Non-
Session Servi Inact Session basic data -ate std
Start (CSS) Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce -ive service term use capab
ID & ref capab -w ID timer funct. capab
time PV
Tester C L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P Not G L A4,06 G L P L P
sends I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V used I I 80,01 I I I I V
0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 0 04 in G4 C 0 02,81 E x E x x
D x 1 x A 8 4 B 8 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 2 x x 4 2 39 Cl 1 1 8 01,00 x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M fax M M M
V5 Undefin- 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The same E 0
ed P and 4 4 C O SUD is used
PLI = 0 D x 1 x A 8 B E (PLI 2 6 F 1 1 E 1 1 8 1 1 for all PDUs 8 0
= 0) * *
V6 Without 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
options 4 4
D x 1 x A 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1
V7 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Separator 4 4
"-" in PV D x 1 x A 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1
0B ****
V8 Wrong PV
in service Not appropriate for group 4 class 1 facsimile
ID
Page 13
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Page 14
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.2: < RSSP > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn Inact Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce contr -ive servic term data capab
Positive ID & ref capab -w ID funct timer funct capab
(RSSP) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 x x 1 0 x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
E x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 0 x x 2 x x 4 2 x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V1 With all 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 x x 1 0 04 Not A4,06 E x F x x E x x
defined 4 4 used 80,01
parameters E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 0 x x 2 x x 4 2 39 in 02,81 x x x x x 8 x x
note1 Gp 4 01,00
Cl 1
V2 With all 0 x o x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 x x 1 0 04 fax E x F x x
P of 4 4
CSS E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 0 x x 2 x x 4 2 39 All x x x x x
note1 note1 note1 no1 note1
PDUs
V3 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 F 0 0 0 1 000 1 x x 1 0 04 E x F x x
more PV 4 4 use
than CSS E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 F 8 1 1 0 210 2 x x 4 2 39 x x x x x
note1 note1 * ** note1 the no1 note1
V4 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 same
undefined 4 4
parameters E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 4 x F 9 x E 1 1 8 1 1 SUD
note1 * *
Table A.2: < RSSP > Session protocol element (Valid cases) (continued)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn Inact Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce contr -ive servic term data capab
Positive ID & ref capab -w ID funct timer funct capab
(RSSP) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 x x 1 0 x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
E x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 0 x x 2 x x 4 2 x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V5 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The
PV = 0 4 4 same
E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 6 D 1 0 E 1 1 8 1 1 SUD is
note1 * used
for all
V6 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 PDUs
PV error 4 4
E x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1 0 1 5
note1 *
V7 LI pres- 0 x 0 x 0F012 0F001 0 0 2 0 0 0F000 0 0 0
ent in 3 4 4
octets E x 1 x 9F08 BF0E C 2 2 5 EF011 8 1 1
note1
V8 Without 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
options 4 4
E x 1 x 9 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1
Page 15
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Page 16
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.2: < RSSP > Session protocol element (Valid cases) (concluded)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn Inact Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce contr -ive servic term data capab
Positive ID & ref capab -w ID funct timer funct capab
(RSSP) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 x x 1 x x 1 0 x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
E x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 0 x x 2 x x 4 2 x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V9 With PV 0 x 0 x 0 1++ 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The
of TID ++ 4 same
coded E x 1 x 9 8++ B E C 2 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1 SUD is
"+++" ** note1 used
for all
V10 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PDUs E 0
LI = 0 4 4
E x 1 x 9 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1 x 0
*
NOTE 1: Present if sent in CSS only.
NOTE 2: Equal to parameters in CSS.
Table A.3: < RSSN > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Reason Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce servic term data capab
Negative ID & ref capab -w ID funct. capab
(RSSN) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 x 3 x x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
C x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 x 2 x x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V1 all 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 04 Not 3 0 0 A4,06 E x F x x E x x
defined 4 4 used 80,01
parameters C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 39 in 2 1 0 02,81 x x x x x 8 x x
note1 Gp 4 01,00
Cl 1
V2 With all 0 x o x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 04 fax 71TA2 E x F x x E x x
P of 4 4 34D(69)
CSS C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 39 262 All x x x x x 8 x x
note1 no1 note1 note1 PDUs no1 note1 note1
use
V3 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 x x 0 0 F 0 0 0 1 0 04 3 0 0 the E x F x x E x x
more PV 4 4 same
than in CSS C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 x D x x E 1 F 8 1 1 4 2 39 2 1 1 SUD x x x x x 8 x x
note1 no1 note1 note1 no1 note1
Page 17
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Page 18
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.3: < RSSN > Session protocol element (Valid cases) (continued)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Reason Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce servic term data capab
Negative ID & ref capab -w ID funct capab
(RSSN) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 x 3 x x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
C x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 x 2 x x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V4 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 x 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0
undefn 4 4 All
parameters C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 4 x F 9 x E 1 1 8 1 1 PDUs
note1 * * use
the
V5 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 same
PV = 0 4 4 SUD
C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 6 D 1 0 E 1 1 8 1 1
note1 *
V6 With 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 FF
PV error 4 4
C x 1 x 9 8 B E C 2 2 6 E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 FF
note1 **
Table A.3: < RSSN > Session protocol element (Valid cases) (concluded)
Response Session reference NonBasicSession Non- Reason Session Private Non-
Session Servi Sessn basic user use std
Start Term Date Addit Misc Windo -ce servic term data capab
Negative ID & ref capab -w ID funct. capab
(RSSN) time
R L G L P L P P L P P L P G L P L P P L P P L P P L P P L P G L P G L P L P P L P
Tester I I I I I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I V I I I I V I I V
sends 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 x 0 x x 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 x 3 x x C 0 x E x F x x E x x
C x 1 x 9 8 4 B E 4 C 2 2 2 x D x x E 1 1 8 1 1 4 2 x 2 x x 1 8 x x x x x x 8 x x
Testcase M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M
note2
V7 LI pres- 0 x 0 x 0F012 0F001 0 0 2 0 0 0F000 0 0 0 All
ent in 3 4 4 PDUs
octets C x 1 x 9F08 BF0E C 2 2 5 EF011 8 1 1 use
note1 the
same
V8 Without 0 x 0 x 0 1 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUD
options 4 4
C x 1 x 9 8 B E 2 3 E 1 1 8 1 1
V9 Without 0 0
parameters
C 0
V10 Service
ID not Not appropriate for group 4 class 1 facsimile
RSSN Invalid cases are inappropriate.
NOTE 1: Present if sent in CSS only.
NOTE 2: Equal to parameters in CSS.
Page 19
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Page 20
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.4: < CSE > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Table A.4: < CSE > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¿
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ Command Session ‡ ‡ Session termination ‡
‡ End (CSE) ‡ ‡ P ‡
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜· C L ‡ P L P ‡
‡ ‡ I I ‡ I I V Optional ‡
‡ Tester sends ‡ 0 x ‡ 1 x x ‡
‡ Testcase ‡ 9 x ‡ 1 x x ‡
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
˘˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�˝˝˝˝˝˝�˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V1 Without ‡ 0 0 ‡ - ‡
‡ parameter ‡ 9 0 ‡ ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V2 With P 11 ‡ 0 0 ‡ 1 0 0 ‡
‡ retain xport ‡ 9 3 ‡ 1 1 0 ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V3 With P 11 but‡ 0 0 ‡ 1 0 0 ‡
‡ release xport‡ 9 3 ‡ 1 1 1 ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ ‡ * * ‡
‡ V4 With PL1 = 0 ‡ 0 0 ‡ 1 0 (-) ‡
‡ ‡ 9 3 ‡ 1 0 ‡
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜`˜˜˜˜˜˜`˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜�
Table A.5: < RSEP > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Table A.5: < RSEP > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¿
‡ ‡ ‡
‡ Response Session End ‡ ‡
‡ Positive (RSEP) ‡ ‡
‡ ‡ ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜· R L ‡
‡ ‡ I I ‡
‡ Tester sends ‡ ‡
‡ ‡ 0 0 ‡
‡ Testcase ‡ A 0 ‡
‡ ‡ ‡
˘˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�
‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V1 Standard ‡ 0 0 ‡
‡ ‡ A 0 ‡
‡ ‡ ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ *** ‡
‡ V2 Three octet LI ‡ 0 F00 ‡
‡ ‡ A F00 ‡
‡ ‡ ‡
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜`˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜�
Page 21
ETS 300 155: February 1995
Table A.6: < CSA > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Table A.6: < CSA > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¿
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ Command Session ‡ ‡ Session ‡
‡ Abort (CSA) ‡ ‡ termination ‡
‡ ‡ ‡ P ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜· C L ‡ P L P ‡
‡ ‡ I I ‡ I I V ‡
‡ Tester sends ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ ‡ 1 x ‡ 1 x x ‡
‡ Testcase ‡ 9 x ‡ 1 x x ‡
‡ ‡ ‡ M M M ‡
˘˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�˝˝˝˝˝˝�˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝˝�
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V1 With P11 ‡ 1 0 ‡ 1 0 0 ‡
‡ ‡ 9 3 ‡ 1 1 0 ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V2 Other PV ‡ 1 0 ‡ 1 0 0 ‡
‡ ‡ 9 3 ‡ 1 1 5 ‡
ˆ˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜¯˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜·
‡ ‡ ‡ ‡
‡ V3 Three octet LI‡ 1 0 ‡ 1 F00 0 ‡
‡ ‡ 9 5 ‡ 1 F01 1 ‡
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜`˜˜˜˜˜˜`˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜�
Table A.7: < RSAP > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
Table A.7: < RSAP > Session protocol element (Valid cases)
�˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜˜´˜
...